This course is from edX, scroll down & click “Read More” for more informations.
About this course
Over the past decade emerging technologies, paired with massive changes in regulations, have driven an unprecedented transformation of finance around the world. This process is happening more rapidly in China and Asia than anywhere else. This course is designed to explore FinTech fundamentals and help make sense of this wave of change as it happens.
New players such as start-ups and technology firms are challenging traditional players in finance, bringing democratization, inclusion and disruption. Companies engaged in social media, e-commerce, and telecommunications, as well as, companies and start-ups with large customer data pools, creative energies, and technical capacities, have brought competition to the existing financial infrastructure and are remaking the industry.
These transformations have not only created challenges but also unprecedented opportunities, building synergies with new business and regulatory models, particularly in emerging markets and developing countries. To meet these changes, 21st-century professionals and students must be equipped with up-to-date knowledge of the industry and its incredible evolution. This course – designed by HKU with the support of SuperCharger and the Centre for Finance, Technology and Education – is designed to enable learners with the necessary tools to understand the complex interaction of finance, technology and regulation.
In this course, through a series of video lectures, case studies, and assessments you will explore the major areas of FinTech including, beginning with What is FinTech before turning to Money, Payment and Emerging Technologies, Digital Finance and Alternative Finance, FinTech Regulation and RegTech, Data and Security, and the Future of Data Driven Finance, as well as, the core technologies driving FinTech including Blockchain, AI and Big Data. These will set the stage for understanding the FinTech landscape and ecosystem and grappling with the potential direction of future change.
What you’ll learn
- The major areas in FinTech, includingMoney and Payment,Digital Finance and Alternative Finance
- Major technological trends, including cryptocurrencies, Blockchain, AI and Big Data
- FinTech Regulation and RegTech
- The fundamental role of Data and Security in data-driven finance
- Businessand regulatory implications of technology for the financial industry
- How regulations and RegTech are applied
- Ways to analyse and evaluate what is driving technology innovation in Finance
- Hownew technology impacts economies, markets, companies,and individuals
Syllabus
Module 1 What is FinTech?
- FinTech Transformation
- FinTech Evolution 1.0: Infrastructure
- FinTech Evolution 2.0: Banks
- FinTech Evolution 3.0 & 3.5: Startups and Emerging Markets
- Industry Showcase: Collaboration between Financial Institutions and Startups
- FinTech Typology
- Emerging Economics: Opportunities and Challenges
- From too-Small-To-Care to Too-Big-To-Fail
- Introduction to Regulation
- Industry Showcase: The Future of RegTech and 6 Technologies Impacting It
Module 2 Payments, Cryptocurrencies and Blockchain
- Individual Payments
- Developing Countries and DFS: The Story of Mobile Money
- Developing Countries and DFS: Regulation of Mobile Money
- RTGS Systems
- The ABCDs of Alternative Finance
- Building a New stack
- Cryptocurrencies
- Industry Showcase : Legal and Regulatory Implications of Cryptocurrencies
- What is Blockchain?
- Industry Showcase: The Benefits from New Payment Stacks (Applications of Ripple)
Module 3 Digital Finance and Alternative Finance
- A Brief History of Financial Innovation
- Digitization of Financial Services
- FinTech & Funds
- Industry Showcase: How AI is Transforming the Future of FinTech
- Industry Showcase: Ensuring Compliance from the Start: Suitability and Funds
- Crowdfunding – Regards, Charity and Equity
- P2P and Marketplace Lending
- The Rise of Chinese TechFins – New Models and New Products
- What is an ICO?
Module 4 FinTech Regulation and RegTech
- FinTech Regulations
- Evolution of RegTech
- RegTech Ecosystem: Financial Institutions
- RegTech Ecosystem: Startups
- RegTech Startups: Challenges
- RegTech Ecosystem: Regulators
- Industry Showcase: Use Case of AI in Smart Regulation and Fraud Detection
- Regulatory Sandboxes
- Smart Regulation
- Redesigning Better Financial Infrastructure
Module 5 Data & TechFin
- History of Data Regulation
- Data in Financial Services
- Industry Showcase : Application of Data Analytics in Finance
- European Big-Bang: PSD2 / GDPR / Mifid2
- Industry Showcase : PSD2: Open Banking API Will Help Startups
- Industry Showcase : Methods of Data Protection: GDPR Compliance and Personal Privacy
- Digital Identity
- Change in mindset: Regulation 1.0 to 2.0 (KYC to KYD)
- AI & Governance
- New Challenges of AI and Machine Learning
- Data, Metadata and Differential Privacy
- Data is the New Oil: Risk of Breach
- Industry Showcase : Cybersecurity Industry Update
Module 6 The Future of Data-Driven Finance
- Case Study 1: Revolut
- Case Study 2: Alibaba
- Case Study 3: Aadhaar
- Case Study 4: Credit Karma
- Case Study 5: Digibank
- Conclusion to Case Studies
- FinTech Big Trends – Looking Forward
Welcome and Course Administration
Welcome to Introduction of FinTech
- FinTech involves the use of technology,
- particularly information technology
- to transform the way that finance is being done
- in global markets, developing countries,
- and across start-ups and tech firms.
- 20 years ago, IBM spent $100 million
- to build Deep Blue, the super computer
- that beat Garry Kasparov.
- This smartphone is more powerful than Deep Blue.
- If you want to be in finance today,
- you need to understand technology.
- RegTech, short for regulatory technology
- may be a game changer
- as it will allow financial institutions
- to deal with compliance and regulatory burdens,
- not only more effectively,
- but also more efficiently.
- FinTech flourishes where the need is greatest.
- China leads the world in many regards.
- YueBao is a money market fund enabled by FinTech in China.
- In 9 months, it became the fourth largest in the world.
- Now 3 years later, it is the world’s largest.
- FinTech has evolved over 3 eras,
- from infrastructure to banks to start-ups,
- entrepreneurs today are building the B2B solution
- that will be powering the financial system tomorrow.
- This course will be an illustration
- of how this is happening today.
- In the future, finance will be
- about an experience, not a product.
- That’s why it’s important for students today
- to understand how the industry is changing
- and that’s what this course will be about.
Course Outline and Syllabus
Introduction to FinTech Course – Course Outline
Introduction to FinTech is a six-week, six-module course. Each weekly module compiles 8-12 lesson units (or subsections). In addition to the main units of the lesson, there are also Industry Showcases highlighting examples and experiences. These include segments from the traditional financial services industry, startups, technology firms, and more.
The major learning activities within each lesson unit include: video discussions of major aspects, as well as continuous assessments in the form of Quick Check questions, Polling, and Word Cloud activities. In addition, there are a range of additional resources, including reports, studies, and useful links. There is a Conclusion Quiz at the end of each module to draw out the main messages.
Please click the link to view and download the Course Syllabus.
Please click the link to view and download the Course Syllabus.
Introduction to FinTech Course Syllabus
Module 1: What is FinTech? | |
1.1 | Module 1 Introduction |
1.2 | FinTech Transformation |
1.3 | FinTech Evolution 1.0: Infrastructure |
1.4 | FinTech Evolution 2.0: Banks |
1.5 | FinTech Evolution 3.0 & 3.5: Startups and Emerging Markets |
Industry Showcase | Collaboration between Financial Institutions and Startups (The FinTech Association of Hong Kong) |
1.6 | FinTech Typology |
1.7 | Emerging Economics: Opportunities and Challenges |
1.8 | From Too-Small-To-Care to Too-Big-To-Fail |
1.9 | Introduction to Regulation |
Industry Showcase | The Future of RegTech and Six Technologies Impacting It (Thomson Reuters) |
Module 2: Payment, Cryptocurrencies and Blockchain | |
2.1 | Module 2 Introduction |
2.2 | Individual Payments |
2.3 | Developing Countries and DFS: The Story of Mobile Money |
2.4 | Developing Countries and DFS: Regulation of Mobile Money |
2.5 | RTGS Systems |
2.6 | The ABCDs of Alternative Finance (Parts 1 & 2) |
2.7 | Building a New Stack |
2.8 | Cryptocurrencies |
Industry Showcase | Introduction to Digital Asset Market (Gatecoin) |
Industry Showcase | Stablecoins (Feron Labs) |
Industry Showcase | Legal and Regulatory Implications of Cryptocurrencies (King & Wood Mallesons) |
2.9 | What is Blockchain? |
Industry Showcase | The Benefits from New Payment Stacks (Applications of Ripple for Standard Chartered Bank) |
Module 3: Digital Finance and Alternative Finance | |
3.1 | Module 3 Introduction |
3.2 | A Brief History of Financial Innovation |
3.3 | Digitization of Financial Services |
3.4 | FinTech & Funds |
Industry Showcase | How AI is Transforming the Future of FinTech (Microsoft) |
Industry Showcase | How Will AI Transform Financial Analysis? (MioTech) |
Industry Showcase | Ensuring Compliance from the Start: Suitability and Funds (Investment Navigator) |
3.5 | Crowdfunding – Regards, Charity and Equity |
3.6 | P2P and Marketplace Lending |
3.7 | The Rise of Chinese TechFins – New Models and New Products |
3.8 | ICOs |
Industry Showcase | Collaborative and Contextual Banking (WeBank) |
Module 4: FinTech Regulation and RegTech | |
4.1 | Module 4 Introduction |
4.2 | FinTech Regulations (Parts 1 & 2) |
4.3 | Evolution of RegTech |
4.4 | RegTech Ecosystem: Financial Institutions |
4.5 | RegTech Ecosystem: Startups |
4.6 | RegTech Startups: Challenges |
4.7 | RegTech Ecosystem: Regulators |
Industry Showcase | The Application of AI in Smart Regulation (Mindbridge) |
4.8 | Regulatory Sandboxes |
Industry Showcase | Balancing Innovation and Regulation Challenges in Hong Kong (Charles Mok) |
4.9 | Smart Regulation |
4.10 | Redesigning Better Financial Infrastructure: India Stack |
Module 5: Data and TechFin | |
5.1 | Module 5 Introduction |
5.2 | History of Data Regulation |
5.3 | Data in Financial Services |
Industry Showcase | Application of Data Analytics in Finance (vPhrase) |
5.4 | European Big-Bang: PSD2 / GDPR / MiFID2 |
Industry Showcase | PSD2: Open Banking API for Startups (Gini) |
Industry Showcase | Methods of Data Protection: GDPR Compliance and Personal Privacy (Exate Technology) |
5.5 | Digital Identity |
5.6 | Change in Mindset: Regulation 1.0 to 2.0 (KYC to KYD) |
5.7 | AI and Governance |
5.8 | New Challenges of AI and Machine Learning |
5.9 | Data, Metadata and Differential Privacy |
5.10 | Data is the New Oil: Risk of Breach |
Industry Showcase | Cybersecurity Industry Update (Microsoft) |
Module 6: The Future of Data-Driven Finance | |
6.1 | Module 6 Introduction |
6.2 | Case Study 1: Revolut |
6.3 | Case Study 2: Alibaba |
6.4 | Case Study 3: Aadhaar |
6.5 | Case Study 4: Credit Karma |
6.6 | Case Study 5: Digibank |
6.7 | Conclusion to Case Studies |
6.8 | FinTech Big Trends – Looking Forward |
Industry Showcase | The Next Big Opportunities in FinTech (Charles Mok) |
Industry Showcase | The FinTech Landscape in China – What’s Next? (Charles Mok) |
Industry Showcase | Research and Development (R&D) and Interactions with Industries (Charles Mok) |
Module 1 What is FinTech?
Welcome to Module 1
1.1 Module 1 Introduction
- Welcome, my name is Douglas Arner
- and this is an introduction to FinTech.
- I am the Kerry Holdings Professor in Law
- at the University of Hong Kong
- and I have spent the past 25 years
- studying the interaction
- between finance, technology and regulation.
- And in this course,
- we are going to provide you
- an introduction to the world of FinTech.
- Financial technology transforming
- the world of finance
- and the wider world beyond
- faster than we have ever seen before.
- In this course,
- I am joined with a group of my friends
- from around the world,
- Ross Buckley of the University of New South Wales in Australia,
- Henri Arslanian of PwC,
- Brian Tang of the Asia Capital Markets Institute,
- Janos Barberis of SuperCharger
- and Huy Nguyen Trieu of the Centre for Finance, Technology and Entrepreneurship.
- In this course, we’re going to begin
- by looking at the fundamental question.
- What is FinTech?
- And that is going to be module 1.
- For module 2,
- we’ll turn to the next question
- which is money, payment
- and the transformation of finance through technology,
- looking at new things
- like cryptocurrencies, Bitcoin, blockchain
- as well as, mobile payments.
- In module 3,
- we’ll turn to the digitization of finance
- and the development of new forms
- of alternative finance, crowdfunding, ICOs,
- new forms of lending and security settlement.
- In module 4, we’ll turn to
- some of the bigger challenges,
- regulatory issues.
- How do we balance the opportunities
- and risks of FinTech
- so that we can make not only FinTech better
- but the financial system
- and the wider economy?
- In module 5, we’ll turn to
- one of the biggest challenges
- facing the world of finance today
- and that is the interaction
- between data and finance
- and the emergence of an entirely new paradigm
- of data-driven finance
- which brings with it tremendous changes
- but also tremendous risks.
- And finally, in the last module,
- module 6, we’ll look at
- a number of case studies
- to draw lessons from our experiences
- and also look at
- some of the big trends going forward.
- So, we very much look forward to you joining this
- in our journey across FinTech.
- At the end of this course,
- we very much hope you will have
- an overall understanding of what is FinTech,
- of some of the major technologies
- that are driving FinTech transformation,
- an understanding of what is happening
- not only in developing markets
- but in particular,
- in exciting new emerging markets,
- particularly in Asia.
- And finally, that you will be able to
- understand in your own life,
- in your own career
- how technology could continue
- to transform finance in the future.
Module 1 Learning Objectives
Module 1 introduces the evolution, context, opportunities, and challenges of FinTech. It highlights to students that FinTech should be defined by the user of technology as opposed to simply the fact of using technology (the ‘who’, not the ‘what’) so as to better understand why this industry is growing ever more rapidly and what opportunities and risks it creates.
Key Learning Objectives:
- Understand how finance and technology have evolved and are transforming finance around the world.
- Discuss key interactions between finance and technology over time to better understand the developments which are taking place today and are likely to take place in the future.
- Consider the broad spectrum of the financial sector and the way that technology is changing it faster than ever before, particularly with the explosion of new entrants, including startups, tech firms and emerging markets.
- Consider both the opportunities as well as the potential risks of FinTech and the challenges it poses for policymakers.
1.2 FinTech Transformation
- Hi there, very excited to be here.
- My name is Henri Aslanian
- and my passion and focus is the future
- of the financial services industry.
- And I’m very lucky to be able to
- do this in my academic life
- as an Adjunct Associate Professor
- here at the University of Hong Kong,
- where I teach the first
- FinTech university course in Asia.
- Also very lucky to be
- doing this in my professional life
- as the FinTech and RegTech leader
- here for Hong Kong for PwC.
- Very excited to be sharing about
- the latest developments
- going on in the broader FinTech space
- throughout this course.
- One question often pops up is that
- how come FinTech became such a big reality?
- What really caused the rise of FinTech?
- Well it’s a very interesting question.
- Traditionally… actually, as technology evolved
- banks were pretty good at also
- always keeping up with technology
- and in many cases,
- being some of the early adopters.
- But all of this really changed
- during the global financial crisis in 2008.
- During that time,
- banks and financial institutions
- were busy dealing with regulations, compliance,
- and other many regulatory enforcement situations
- that were taking place.
- Innovation became a very, very distant priority.
- But at the same time,
- some of the biggest game changing innovations
- that took place
- that have changed our lives took place.
- Think about Uber, WhatsApp,
- WeChat, or Airbnb,
- and many others that really changed the way
- customers ahead experience the services
- they were receiving in many industries,
- except financial services,
- and this gap was created
- between what financial institutions
- were offering to their customers
- and what customers came to expect.
- And this gap is
- what the FinTech industry wanted to tackle.
- And the FinTech industry wanted to tackle
- very many of the use cases;
- that matched the pain points
- that were in this industry.
- However, it was not only the startups.
- And actually what we realised
- over the course of the years is actually
- some of the biggest gamechanging
- technological innovations took place
- not only by FinTech startups
- but by large technology firms.
- Think about firms like
- Amazon, or Tencent, or Ant Financial
- and many others who have started now
- looking at financial services.
- And in the future
- there’s actually a big chance that
- some of the providers of financial services,
- at least the interface
- that clients will be using
- may be these large technology firms.
- So definitely an area to watch.
- And what are some of the advantages
- these large technology firms have
- over some of these startups?
- Not only do they have the funding,
- they have the backing,
- and the talent, and the pool, capital pool
- to actually support these new businesses,
- but to certain extent,
- they have the trust of consumers.
- Think about it,
- if you’re happy to buy
- all your daily necessities
- on Amazon, or on Taobao,
- wouldn’t you use them as well
- to actually, you know,
- buy insurance products?
- If you’re actually using the Facebook Messenger
- to actually talk to your friends and family
- wouldn’t you use them as well to send money
- to friends and family as well?
- Well, as you can see,
- it’s going to be a very interesting ecosystem
- developing over the coming years
- not only with FinTech,
- but also by TechFin.
- Definitely an area to watch.
1.3 FinTech Evolution 1.0: Infrastructure
- Finance and technology
- have been inextricably intertwined
- since the very beginning.
- If we look at the earliest days of finance
- dating back thousands of years ago,
- the initial impact of technology
- was in the context of building systems
- of keeping records of government finances
- or payments for taxes
- and agricultural production
- or building facilities
- and one of the first physical technologies
- to develop was money
- the simple coin
- or thousands of years later,
- not long after 1000 A.D.,
- paper money.
- Money is a form of technology
- that allows us to physically handle
- the ideas embedded in finance.
- So, if we think about financial technology,
- the history is very, very long indeed
- and in addition to coins,
- paper money, systems of writing
- or accounting,
- major points include the evolution
- of the joint stock company
- or the corporation,
- forms of financing like banking,
- or more recently, stocks, bonds,
- things that we would call
- securities or derivatives.
- Derivatives are financial instruments
- whose value derives
- from some underlying financial instrument
- but if we think of today’s fintech,
- the modern period of fintech
- and financial technology
- begins around 150 years ago
- and we generally mark the date as 1867.
- Why 1867?
- 1867 was the date of the establishment
- of the first transatlantic telegraph cable.
- That transatlantic telegraph cable
- made instantaneous communication
- between the major markets
- of New York and London,
- or London and Paris,
- or even eventually several decades later,
- Shanghai, or Hong Hong, and London possible.
- This was the basic infrastructure
- that underlies all of today’s
- not only financial technology
- but much of today’s communications
- and media developments as well
- and it’s somewhat ironic
- that in the past five years
- more undersea cable has been laid
- than in the entire previous 150 years combined.
- Why?
- Because more physical cables are necessary
- to handle the ever greater flows of data
- speeding around the world
- and underpinning
- the development of finance.
- Many would say
- that the period from the 1860s
- up to the start of the First World War
- was a first period of
- financial and economic globalisation
- much like the past 30 years or so from today.
- That period of
- financial and economic globalisation
- was underpinned by technological infrastructure
- like the transatlantic telegraph cable
- which in fact has been called
- the Victorian internet.
- Now, if we think about
- technological developments
- in financial services,
- probably our next significant milestone
- really comes during the Second War World.
- During the Second World War,
- significant effort spent particularly
- in the context of developing codes
- for secure communications
- particularly of military and intelligence operations
- as well as, significant efforts
- to develop systems to break those codes
- and it was this process of encoding
- and breaking codes that led
- to come of the groundbreaking thinking
- in computer technology
- and in fact,
- eventually in artificial intelligence or AI
- which is one of the most exciting developments
- happening in financial technology today.
- But it wasn’t until the period
- after the Second War World
- as the world economy is rebuilding
- that we begin to see progressive development
- of those early computer technologies
- to eventually lay the ground work
- for the sorts of fintech
- and regtech developments
- which we see today.
1.4 FinTech Evolution 2.0: Banks
- The first era of modern fintech,
- fintech 1.0 was about
- building the underlying infrastructure
- that supports today’s global financial markets.
- The second major era
- of the modern fintech evolution,
- what we call fintech 2.0,
- started in 1967.
- 1967 marks two very important dates
- in the evolution of finance
- and also technology.
- The first, is the establishment of the first ATM,
- the first automated teller machine
- by Barclays Bank in the UK.
- That automated teller machine allowed,
- over the next several decades,
- a transformation in the relationship
- that people had with money and with finance.
- The second, just as significant,
- is the launch of the first handheld calculator
- by Texas Instruments.
- The first handheld calculator
- was transformational in the way
- that finance, on a day-to-day basis operated
- And, of course, the handheld calculator
- is also the ancestor of today’s smartphone,
- perhaps the transformative technology
- in the context of fintech.
- 1967 thus marks a period where we begin
- to see a process of digitization.
- Digitization is taking processes and systems,
- which were formerly analogue,
- analogue things like handwriting
- or physical calculation of money,
- and digitising them, transforming them
- into a digital environment.
- And from these early beginnings,
- we can see in global financial markets,
- three very significant trends
- that come together
- in today’s global financial markets.
- The first, the late 1960s and early 1970s,
- the establishment of a series of
- domestic and international
- electronic payment systems.
- These payment systems allow
- large value payments
- to take place today on a real time basis,
- which underpins massive volumes
- of transactions around the world.
- From across border standpoint,
- perhaps the most significant of these
- is an organisation,
- which we’ll turn to in module two,
- called SWIFT.
- SWIFT is an organisation,
- which provides protocols
- to enable communications
- between domestic digital payment systems.
- In addition to these developments in payments,
- we also see, in 1971,
- the establishment of NASDAQ.
- NASDAQ was the world’s 1st electronic stock exchange.
- Today, there are almost no stock exchanges
- or other financial exchanges,
- which are not electronic.
- Basically, in the context of both payments,
- as well as, in stock and other securities markets,
- the process of digitization,
- which began in the late ’60s and early 1970s,
- has fundamentally transformed
- the way these markets work,
- so much so that today, it is very difficult
- to find a human being actually trading securities
- with another human being in stock markets.
- At another level, if we think of
- today’s global foreign exchange markets,
- markets in which people buy one currency,
- like the dollar and sell another,
- like the yen or the RMB,
- these markets today
- do approximately 5.5 trillion dollars
- a day, every day of the year in transactions
- and almost none of this
- takes place in the form of cash.
- It is almost entirely digital book entries
- taking place between the computer systems
- of major financial institutions.
- This process, however,
- is one that was in fact
- well established by the late 1980s.
- A major market crash occurred in 1987.
- That market crash today,
- our best explanation,
- is what is called programme trading.
- Programme trading involves preset computerised
- buy and sell orders,
- and so when stock prices
- drop to a certain level,
- this would trigger automatic selling
- by computer programmes,
- which would then trigger more price drops,
- triggering more sales and eventually resulting
- in our first major coordinated
- global market crash.
- Now, across the 1980s,
- we began with the origins of online banking
- in parallel to the emergence of the internet
- and certainly by
- the beginning of the 21st century,
- a number of banks already had
- over a million plus online banking customers,
- but today, we are waiting to see
- what will be the first financial institution
- with over a billion online financial services customers.
- If we think in terms of developments,
- we can think that 1999 marked a previous high.
- 1999 was the internet bubble,
- the dotcom crash
- and it highlights something
- that’s very important
- in the context of today’s fintech.
- As human beings,
- we tend to overestimate the short term impact
- of new technologies
- and underestimate the long term impact
- of new technologies.
- After all, if we think to
- some of the 1999 internet bubble companies,
- companies like Amazon or Google.
- Certainly, at that time,
- we overestimated their short term impact,
- but looking back almost 20 years,
- almost no one would have imagined
- how significant
- Google, Amazon, and other similar sorts
- of technology companies have become.
- This period of building the digitization
- of the financial system
- hit a major turning point
- in 2008 with the global financial crisis.
1.5 FinTech Evolution 3.0 & 3.5: Startups & Emerging Markets
- Fintech 3.0 and 3.5.
- 2008 marks a major turning point
- in the evolution of fintech.
- The global financial crisis of 2008
- started in the subprime real estate markets of the United States
- and spread throughout the global financial system
- to major developed markets around the world,
- as well as impacting developing
- and emerging market countries
- through the economic slowdown
- that from the standpoint of trade,
- was just as severe as the slowdown
- that we saw in the 1930s
- in the aftermath of the 1929 crisis.
- From the standpoint of fintech,
- the global financial crisis had a number of
- very important features.
- The first, was that it resulted in large numbers
- of job losses in the financial sector,
- particularly amongst younger people.
- This drove many of those people
- who had been looking forward
- to very good careers
- in the context of financial sector
- to seek to pursue other opportunities.
- And it’s certainly the case today
- that if one meets someone
- who has just left a large financial institution,
- it is very frequently the case
- that they have gone to
- start a new fintech startup company.
- So, first impact of the global financial crisis,
- job losses
- forcing people in the financial sector
- to look for new opportunities.
- The second was that
- a reaction to the global financial crisis
- involved large numbers of
- regulatory changes designed to prohibit
- or prevent the sorts of problems
- that emerged in 2008
- from happening again.
- These massive amounts of regulatory changes
- resulted in a dramatic decrease in profitability
- of financial institutions
- as well as massive increases
- in compliance and regulatory cost
- for those institutions.
- In many ways, the only way
- that these new requirements
- could be addressed was via technology.
- The third impact of the global financial crisis
- really was to speed up something,
- which was already happening,
- which was a loss or a drop in trust
- in traditional financial institutions.
- Since 2008,
- certainly amongst people under 35,
- it is now generally recognised
- that they would be more comfortable
- doing financial transactions
- with a technology company,
- whether Facebook or Alibaba
- or Tencent or Google
- than with a traditional financial institution
- like HSBC, Barclays or Bank of America.
- These features together
- along with one other important point
- and that important point
- is marked by 2007.
- 2007 was the launch of the first iPhone.
- The iPhone, of course,
- has now sold over a billion
- around the world and the iPhone
- and other forms of smartphones
- combined with other factors resulting from
- the global financial crisis set the stage
- for the transformation in fintech,
- which we’re seeing today.
- Now, if we think about this combination,
- the combination has led to
- an explosion in startups.
- One very high profile startup
- is perhaps one of the most unique
- and one that we’ll turn to in module two,
- Bitcoin and other forms of cryptocurrency
- based on blockchain
- or distributed ledger technologies.
- Others have involved various forms
- of alternative finance like P2P lending, peer-to-peer lending,
- or forms of crowdfunding,
- a range of different payments.
- But in fact,
- startups in the context of fintech
- are even not new.
- If we think back to 1999,
- one of those internet bubble startups
- was a company called PayPal.
- PayPal today is one of the world’s
- most significant payment services providers
- along with traditional firms
- like Visa or MasterCard
- or even before that, Bloomberg.
- Bloomberg today
- is the world’s most valuable
- private information services firm.
- Bloomberg founded by
- the former mayor of New York City,
- Michael Bloomberg, started in 1981.
- Bloomberg started in technology
- in an investment bank called Salomon Brothers.
- The technology that he developed
- was a secure communication service
- that still underlies the vast majority
- of cross border transactions around the world.
- So, this period of fintech 3.0,
- the explosion in startups
- since the global financial crisis is new
- in terms of numbers, volume, transformative potential
- but we have seen fintech startups before.
- The other area where the transformation
- has been perhaps even more dramatic
- is in the context of developing countries
- and emerging markets.
- 2007 marks the launch of M-Pesa.
- M-Pesa is a mobile phone-based payment system,
- which transformed access to finance
- of a large portion of the population of Kenya
- and it’s when we combine these ideas
- of mobile payment with the smartphone
- that we see the transformation
- of financial services
- that is taking place particularly in China
- with Alibaba, Tencent and others.
Industry Showcase: Collaboration between Financial Institutions and Startups (The FinTech Association of Hong Kong)
- Collaboration plays a very important role
- in the way FinTech has developed in the last few years,
- in particular, in Hong Kong.
- Initially, we saw a lot of work done by FinTechs
- trying to do it on themselves,
- looking to disrupt financial services
- and also the banks at one stage,
- looking to be more guarded
- about how they use technology,
- especially FinTechs with them.
- But as the reality dawned on the markets,
- such as Hong Kong,
- which is largely business-to-business,
- people realised that
- there needs to be a lot of collaboration.
- Banks need a longer time for transformation,
- but they also need to be able to be more agile
- with regards to adopting new technologies,
- and for FinTechs,
- they don’t have a long runway,
- and secondly, they also aren’t able
- to have the required capital
- if they want to face off with banks,
- in particular,
- where larger creations are impacted.
- So, it’s quite important that
- collaboration is done in this field.
- Secondly, what we are seeing now is
- banks are not just collaborating with FinTechs,
- but they’re going a step ahead
- and some of them are acquiring them
- through strategic investments.
- So, they’ll have a large investment,
- and these FinTechs are solving
- just the banks’ need for strategy
- in Hong Kong or across the region.
- Three, very importantly,
- is cross-regional collaboration.
- So, you see certain strands of different FinTechs
- in different regions,
- and what banks are trying to do
- is try to find these FinTechs here.
- If you have a FinTech which is very strong
- in the B2B section of AI in Hong Kong,
- they look to use that from Hong Kong,
- and they might use another
- coming in from Singapore.
- So, it becomes very important for them
- to have teams that can collaborate this.
- Lastly, it is very important
- that compliance plays a role
- in making this effort of collaboration
- between banks and FinTechs faster.
- Onboarding is a very important factor
- and of compliance,
- time can be shortened.
- It gives the start-ups
- more time to present a POC
- and be onboarded with the banks.
- So, collaboration plays an important role,
- and we should be aware that
- banking is going to change
- not by disruption,
- but through collaboration.
1.6 FinTech Typology
- As we’ve seen,
- the evolution of fintech has impacted
- every aspect of finance everywhere in the world
- and I think
- from the standpoint of looking at fintech,
- it makes sense to look at
- the main areas where fintech is focused on
- in the literature, as well as in business.
- And those can be summarised
- as finance and investment,
- operations and risk management,
- payments and infrastructure,
- data security and monetization,
- and technology in the customer interface.
- And in each of these areas,
- technology has both created new areas,
- as well as transformed
- existing businesses and processes.
- If we think of finance and investment,
- often we’ll think of forms of alternative financing
- like crowdfunding or P2P lending,
- or most recently, ICOs.
- ICOs are initial coin offerings
- and are a topic that we’ll turn back to in module 3
- but as we saw in discussing the evolution,
- technology has not only
- created new forms of financing
- but via digitization,
- it has also transformed
- traditional forms of financing.
- Think of stock market trading
- and the fact that today,
- in the world’s high frequency algorithmic stock markets,
- that hundreds of thousands of transactions take place
- every single second
- of every day that the markets are open.
- And this simply cannot happen without technology.
- And of course,
- areas like hedge funds and investment funds
- are some of the biggest spenders on technology,
- a constant arms race to gain a slight edge
- in trading and investment
- in order to drive profitability.
- So, fintech has transformed
- both new forms of finance
- but it has also changed
- traditional forms of finance.
- If we look at operations
- and risk management, pre-crisis,
- much of operations and risk management
- in the financial services industry
- focused on quantitative risk modelling techniques
- such as VAR or value at risk systems,
- which depended upon sophisticated computer systems
- developed across the 1990s
- but in many ways,
- the 2008 crisis showed the limitations
- of many of these approaches.
- Since 2008, financial institutions,
- as well as regulators,
- have continued to be amongst the largest spenders
- of any industry in the world on IT,
- focusing in particular,
- on new regulatory requirements,
- as well as risk management systems
- but also competition from new entrants
- whether those new entrants are startups,
- or they are established technology,
- media, or communications firms.
- Payments and infrastructure is a very high profile area.
- For many of us, electronic payments
- will be one of our primary areas
- of direct interaction with fintech.
- Most of us have made payments
- over the internet,
- or using our mobile phone,
- or using a QR code;
- simple techniques,
- which allow instantaneous payments
- both in electronic form,
- as well as increasingly using a variety of forms
- of mobile and smart technology.
- But in addition to this,
- these 5.5 trillion dollar a day
- global currency markets take place
- in a completely digitised environment
- and new technologies like blockchain,
- or distributed ledger technology,
- which we’ll turn to in module 2,
- as well as in module 6,
- are transforming
- traditional large value digital payments.
- All of this digitization
- brings with it both opportunities,
- as well as risks.
- On the opportunity side,
- digitization of ever increasing sources
- and forms of data
- has allowed a new process of datafication.
- Datafication is the application of
- sophisticated analytics systems,
- big data, or artificial intelligence and the like,
- in order to analyse large volumes of data
- to come up with new approaches or new ways
- to monetize those sources of data
- but at the same time,
- with data increasingly in digital-only form,
- risks of security continue to increase.
- If everything is digitised,
- the risk of hacking,
- the risks of cybersecurity
- have moved from being a business risk
- to a financial stability risk
- to a national security risk today.
- And these are areas
- that are driving both technology,
- as well as new entrants, new businesses,
- new opportunities, and of course,
- the customer interface.
- How we interact with these forms of finance
- provides not only
- greater opportunities for individuals
- in terms of convenience and access
- but also, new business technologies.
1.7 Emerging Economics: Opportunities and Challenges
- As we’ve seen,
- technology over the past decade
- has transformed finance around the world.
- It brings with it massive opportunities,
- and those opportunities
- are perhaps nowhere greater than
- in developing countries and emerging markets.
- If we think of the story of Africa,
- of M-Pesa In Kenya,
- and mobile financial services,
- the impact of mobile financial services
- through old-style mobile phones
- has been very significant.
- But, there’s a big limitation
- in terms of what you can do
- with an old-style mobile phone,
- compared to what can be done
- with a modern smartphone.
- The power of a modern smartphone
- dwarfs the power
- of a room-sized IBM mainframe from the 1970s.
- The computing power that
- we can hold in our hands today
- is unprecedented in the history of the world,
- and from the standpoint of
- what one can do in finance
- with that technology,
- the transformation which is
- already taking place in Asia
- is nothing short of amazing.
- Why?
- Because throughout much of Asia,
- we have two very significant features.
- One, very often, high penetration rates,
- high ownership rates of smartphones,
- combined with availability of broadband internet access.
- This combination of smartphones
- with broadband internet access
- combines with a feature of
- many emerging markets around the world,
- which is often inefficient
- traditional banking and financial systems.
- And this combination allows emerging markets
- to leapfrog a hundred years of developments
- which took place in western markets
- in a short period of a few years.
- And perhaps the best example we have
- seen is in the context of China.
- Today, if we think of the major internet
- and e-commerce firms in China,
- firms like Alibaba, Tencent, Baidu,
- or even traditional financial institutions like Ping An,
- today, the numbers of customers
- using their financial services
- are absolutely staggering.
- It has transformed
- the interaction of the individual
- with technology in finance,
- and at the same time
- is transforming the financial systems
- and the economies of emerging markets.
- One that we’ll turn back to in Module 4,
- we’ve seen in the context of India.
- Using a variety of
- technological infrastructure design elements
- to support expansion of finance
- to literally hundreds of millions of people
- who did not previously have access
- to financial services.
- This is perhaps the most important story
- that we’ve ever seen
- in the context of financial inclusion,
- economic growth,
- and financial transformation.
- And it’s exciting
- because many of the developments
- are being led for the first time in Asia.
- At the same time,
- these tremendous changes and opportunities
- also bring with them new risks.
- An idea that things can move faster
- than we’ve ever seen before.
- And if we look at the things
- that have changed in fintech,
- it is the combination of new entrants,
- startups and technology companies
- with speed of change
- that is driving so much of the opportunities
- and the transformations.
- But, this combination of
- new entrants and speed of technology
- allows something else to happen as well,
- and that is for risks
- to grow ever more rapidly
- than they have ever done before.
- In an example,
- a new banking startup
- launched by a technology company
- can acquire,
- in a period of a weekend, millions of customers,
- taking in one weekend
- the amount that would have taken
- in a traditional developed market decades
- for a financial institution to achieve.
- This is the risk that we call
- moving from too small to care
- to too big to fail,
- and it can now occur in record time.
1.8 From Too-Small-To-Care to Too-Big-To-Fail
- We are now going to be
- talking about an important notion.
- The notion of going from too small to care
- to too big to fail.
- This notion is important,
- because it fits into
- what you have been learning so far
- in our first module.
- Financial technology
- is a 150-year-old industry
- that has been divided
- across 3 different eras.
- The first era was a 100 years old,
- the second era was 40 years old,
- and the third era,
- in which we are today,
- will be about a decade old.
- Now what you start noticing is that
- each of these era
- are shorter than the previous one.
- And what this means,
- is that technology is changing faster,
- and is penetrating into the public
- at a faster rate than ever before.
- And that’s something that
- you can actually notice
- from your own perspective.
- Let’s take the phone, for example.
- It took many decades for land lines
- to reach a million customers in the US.
- However, it only took a few years
- for mobile phones
- to reach the same penetration
- in that country.
- Now let’s bring that to finance
- and let’s think about banks.
- Acquiring half a million customers
- is a very big feet.
- But KakaoTalk
- has been able to do that in only 2 days.
- Now if you take challenger banks
- or regular banks,
- it would typically take them many years
- for them to acquire
- the same number of customers.
- Finally, I can also give you
- the example of Bitcoin.
- Most of you must have heard of Bitcoin,
- if not already owned some Bitcoins.
- And here the example is very clear.
- As an asset class,
- Bitcoin is becoming more valuable
- faster than any other asset classes
- that previously have led to a bubble.
- What Bitcoin has done in only one year,
- it took many more years
- for other classes to do.
- Therefore, those three examples
- are an illustration
- that technology is changing
- more and more rapidly,
- and therefore regulators
- need to adapt themselves.
- Let me show you a graph.
- On the Y-axis,
- you have the size of a company,
- and on the X-axis,
- you have the time it takes
- for that company to grow.
- Now, normally what we are used to understand,
- is the notion of organic growth.
- You will grow
- because of the results of your business,
- and every now and then,
- you may grow from an acquisition.
- And financial institutions that you may know,
- such as tier one players like Citi, HSBC, etc.,
- have grown as financial institution
- over the last 100 plus years.
- And therefore,
- their path of growth is very predictable.
- For regulators, that’s actually very useful,
- because regulators don’t necessarily always regulate
- and enforce action
- against certain companies.
- Indeed, what you will see now
- on the X-axis,
- is that you go from too small to care,
- too large to ignore, to too big to fail.
- What this means is that
- if you are between too small to care
- and too large to ignore,
- regulators may or may not,
- at their own discretion,
- choose to enforce an action against you,
- if you are breaching a rule.
- The reason of that discretion
- is because not everything
- is worth suing for.
- If you are only having
- one or two consumers that you are hurting,
- this is not worth the regulator’s time,
- compared to a breach
- that would impact over a million persons.
- However, the second problem is
- companies that become too big to fail.
- The notion of too big to fail
- is deeply rooted
- into the financial crisis,
- in the same way that the financial crisis
- has led to the emergence of FinTech.
- But in a similar fashion,
- the emergence of mobile phone
- has also favorized the emergence of FinTech,
- and with it,
- the mobile phone is a distribution channel
- for financial technology companies.
- Because now financial technology companies
- can use that infrastructure
- to more quickly reach you
- as a consumer,
- they can go to too small to care
- to too big to fail overnight,
- creating a regulatory blind spot for regulators.
- This is the example that we take,
- for example, in China with Yu’e Bao.
- Yu’e Bao went from
- zero to 90 billion US dollar
- of assets under management
- in only nine months.
- They did in nine months
- what it took over seven decades
- for large tier-one asset managers to achieve.
- Therefore, regulatory sandboxes
- are one of the first tools for regulators
- to resolve the risk created from startups
- that go from too small to care to big to fail,
- but that’s only the first step.
- The second step will be
- about building smart regulation
- on top of regulatory sandboxes,
- and we will cover that topic
- in the RegTech module of this course.
1.9: Introduction to Regulation
- Fintech is the intersection
- of finance, technology, and regulation.
- Financial services
- even before the 2008 global financial crisis
- was already one of the world’s
- most heavily regulated industries.
- And as a result,
- when we think about fintech,
- we have to also think about
- regulation and the environment
- in which finance and technology operate.
- And fintech,
- because of the changes in new entrants
- as well as,
- speed of technological development
- poses major challenges for policy makers
- in determining
- how best to regulate markets
- in order to best achieve the objectives,
- the opportunities of financial inclusion,
- of democratisation of finance,
- of financial transformation,
- while at the same time,
- minimising the risks
- of both financial fraud, misconduct,
- as well as, financial crises.
- And if we think back
- to before the global financial crisis,
- prior to the global financial crisis,
- regulators and policymakers
- tended to have a very positive attitude
- towards financial innovation.
- There’s a famous quote from Paul Volcker,
- former Chairman of the U.S. Federal Reserve,
- where he says that,
- “the only important financial innovation
- that he had seen in his lifetime was the ATM machine.”
- Why?
- The ATM machine fundamentally improved
- people’s day-to-day lives,
- and this was in contrast
- to some of the financial innovations that we saw
- prior to the global financial crisis,
- many of which were central
- to that crisis happening.
- Things like credit derivatives,
- or credit default obligations
- or asset backed securities,
- all of which were financial innovations,
- but also innovations
- which brought new risks.
- Because of the global financial crisis,
- for the past 10 years,
- regulators and policymakers around the world
- have taken a very cautious approach
- to financial services regulation,
- focusing on building
- new costly regulatory frameworks
- to prevent crises,
- to prevent misconduct,
- to protect customers,
- but at the same time,
- triggering developments in fintech,
- but also making innovation
- more challenging and more difficult.
- And so, over the past several years,
- as regulators have become more comfortable
- with the opportunities
- and potential transformative developments
- taking place in fintech,
- they have also become more friendly
- from the standpoint of regulation.
- But from the standpoint of regulation,
- as we’ll see throughout the rest of the course,
- there’s a continual process
- of balancing objectives
- like protecting consumers,
- protecting the safety and soundness
- of the financial sector,
- protecting against financial crises
- with objectives of financial inclusion,
- competition, innovation, and development.
- And it is this regulatory environment that
- much of fintech takes place in today.
The Future of RegTech and 6 Technologies Impacting It (by Thomson Reuters)
- Hello. My name is Julia Walker.
- I’m the head of Market Development
- for Regulatory Technology across Asia-Pacific.
- So, what is RegTech?
- Well, I like to think about RegTech
- being FinTech’s best friend,
- or at least the more sensible better half.
- Perhaps we can think about it this way:
- if FinTech is the rock star,
- RegTech is the band member
- happy to hang out in the background.
- However, RegTech has more recently started
- to take center-stage,
- usually increasing regulatory challenges
- in the financial sector,
- and the need to apply technology to solve them.
- As you’ll see in this module,
- the future of RegTech
- is one of positive financial innovation,
- as well of benefits for financial regulation.
- It’s the combination of both opening the door
- for the automation of regulation.
- In this module, we will show
- six new emerging technologies,
- and how these will redefine the future of RegTech.
- In module one, we provided you with a macro-trend
- of increased regulatory activity
- and enforcement since 2008.
- However now I wanted to help you
- with three simple illustrations
- to grasp the complexity behind regulatory adherence.
- As you can see in this graph, regulation is complex,
- voluminous and interconnected.
- When you understand that large tier one universal banks
- operate in over 60 jurisdictions,
- it’s easier to picture the difficulty
- to comply globally.
- Especially with new rules
- having cross-jurisdictional affect such as GDPR.
- In addition, compliant obligations
- are always in a state of flux.
- Regulators’ proactivity around the world
- can be seen by the number of regulatory changes.
- Regulatory alerts increased from 8,000 in 2008
- to 56,000 in 2017,
- an average of 216 alerts per day.
- The global financial crisis of 2008
- highlighted the systemic risk
- within the global financial system,
- serious conduct issues and a push to
- tighten anti-money laundering controls.
- Regulators in the United States
- and Europe have imposed 342 billion in fines
- on banks for misconduct,
- including the violation of anti-money laundering rules,
- and it is likely to top 400 billion by 2020.
- And it’s not just the fines causing headaches,
- conduct issues are also leading to revenue loss.
- A Hong Kong-based financial services company
- has estimated that bad behaviour
- has erased 850 billion in profits
- for the top 50 global banks.
- In New York, a 185 million dollar fine was issued
- for failing to protect client assets,
- and it’s just not finances getting fined.
- RegTech can also help other industries
- especially when we know that regulatory enforcement
- is on the rise for corporates.
- 18 billion has been imposed to a car manufacturer,
- and 60 million to
- a Japanese-based electronics company.
- On the backdrop of
- these macro changes in cost pressures
- is a number of new emerging technologies.
- In our discussion today,
- we want to look at some of the underlying trends
- that will shape the global financial system
- over the next 10 to 20 years,
- and remove the pain points associated
- with compliance obligations.
- Blockchain.
- Immutable, consensus driven,
- transparent, distributed, work flow enabled,
- and trust being replaced with truth.
- Blockchain could potentially
- power the identity market place
- and has the potential to modernise
- or even replace existing trading,
- clearing, and settlement operations.
- Smart contracts and smart oracles will exist
- to enable customers to use blockchain
- to streamline post-trade life-cycle,
- and other capital market use cases.
- Digitised assets with blockchain
- as a potential new way to digitise
- and maintain records for government
- and other relevant industries.
- Cognitive computing and artificial intelligence.
- We are just at the beginning of a revolution
- that will touch every business,
- and every life on this planet.
- The data volumes are exploding.
- More data has been created
- in the past two years
- than in the entire previous history of the human race.
- At the moment however,
- less than 0.5% of all data is ever analysed and used.
- As this quantum of data grows
- the need for standards,
- structure and integration does also.
- The need for smart machines
- to synthesise and make sense of data
- and support the human cognitive
- and decision-making process is therefore paramount.
- The internet of things.
- Electronic sensors are showing up
- in devices all around the world.
- We now have self-driving cars that can navigate
- their way through traffic.
- Even regular cars track with AI
- in how fast they’re going.
- But how can this enormous world of information
- generated by machines and sensors
- be used for better financial investment,
- trading decisions, and risk management?
- How can this data be aggregated
- and anonymized to protect individual privacy
- while retaining its most useful, actual information?
- Customers must have the confidence that
- their data is collected, stored, and used
- in a manner that benefits them,
- and does not jeopardise their privacy.
- Open source and API economy.
- APIs are fueling
- the customer-driven platform revolution.
- They’re becoming a primary customer interface
- for technology-driven products and services,
- and a key channel for driving revenue
- and brand engagement.
- APIs are a set of rules
- that govern how one type
- of computer software communicates with another.
- They enable bank customers to
- share their personal financial information
- with third parties to generate opportunities
- for better deals on financial products
- and to use transaction data to access
- and compare products easily.
- From the bank’s perspective,
- the technology enables them to remain competitive
- by providing them with opportunities
- to provide improved customer-friendly services
- and reach out to untapped markets.
- The Cloud.
- Everyone is looking at the Cloud,
- and for good reason.
- Cloud computing eliminates the capital expenditure
- of buying hardware and software and setting up
- and running on-site data centres.
- Big data.
- Firms need help organising
- and collecting enterprise and third party data
- to derive new insights.
- Data tagging allows investors, regulators
- and market participants
- to organise and analyse massive amounts of data
- and information more efficiently
- by associating pieces of information
- with keyword tags.
- The rapid changes and maturation of technologies
- from big data management to advanced analytics
- to machine learning,
- to artificial intelligence,
- and robotic process automation are
- fueling product innovation
- and providing customers potential opportunities
- to further transform operations.
- So there you go,
- six of the key technologies that you need to be aware of
- as we look at the future of RegTech
- but before I leave you,
- I wanted to highlight the three critical considerations
- to harness the value
- of innovation brought by RegTech.
- First, RegTech solutions need to be powered
- by trusted, structured and unstructured data
- that also has data mastering capability
- for effective integration with existing solutions.
- Second, advanced analytics
- and artificial intelligence
- will play a key role.
- And lastly, digital identity.
- Digital identity is a foundation
- to all RegTech solutions
- because identity of individual, organisation,
- or a physical asset are atomic in governance,
- regulatory compliance
- and risk-management solutions.
- We will cover this in more detail in module five.
Additional Resource Insights
References and Suggestions for Further Reading:
Big banks on notice as tech groups ramp up pressure (News article – FT)
Bank of the Future (Industry report – Citi Bank)
Module 2 Payment, Cryptocurrencies and Blockchain
Welcome to Module 2
2.1 Module 2 Introduction
- Welcome back to Hong Kong U FinTech Course.
- We are now starting the second module
- covering payments and money.
- In this course,
- you will learn about, first,
- how payment has evolved over the years,
- second, its importance in the context of FinTech,
- and finally, how new technologies
- such as distributed ledger technology
- is building a brand new payment stack.
- Payment is a critical part of finance.
- Since the FinTech industry
- caught the eyes of investors,
- payment has consistently been
- the largest sub-sector
- in terms of VC investment.
- Not only this,
- but the media coverage has strongly covered
- the impact of e-money
- whether in Africa with M-Pesa
- and Alipay in China,
- two examples that
- we will cover further in this module.
- Whilst the majority of the FinTech industry
- is represented by B2B companies,
- payment represents an exception in many respect.
- This industry has many layers
- and therefore clients and users.
- We will reveal and explain
- how each are interrelated
- and how technology has changed
- their model of operation.
- Payment is unique in that
- we use it every day,
- in Europe alone,
- people are using their contactless card
- over 10 times every day.
- It also represents a very social element,
- whether it’s gifting or requesting money,
- technology is changing the way
- we interact with people,
- from WeChat red-envelope connecting families
- thousands of miles apart
- to Venmo bill splitting feature
- which is changing the social stigma
- over requesting for cash.
- However, there is more than the eye can see.
- Payment to function
- correctly relies on a complex infrastructure
- such as telco operators, banks
- or international consortiums like Swift.
- In this module,
- we will put you at the centre of the industry.
- We will be entering each layer one by one,
- before showing you
- the future of the industry
- and how and why we believe
- it’s now at a tipping point.
- You can imagine
- each of this course’s module as circle.
- You will easily relate to the one closest to you
- but you will also learn about
- the importance of the underlying infrastructure
- found in the more distant circles
- which you may not use on a regular basis.
- The first circle is the one closest to you
- and you are in its centre.
- We will introduce payment
- from point of view of an individual
- and how it has evolved
- from barter to cash,
- from checks to cards,
- and more recently, QR codes and cryptocurrency.
- The second circle looks at
- non-banks and telecom operators
- that have provided payment solution,
- leveraging on mobile phones
- and person-to-person networks they represent.
- These new entrants are providing services
- to a previously underserved market,
- but with it, raises opportunities and risks.
- The third circle is composed of your bank
- and your government central bank.
- Traditionally a place where
- you have deposited your money,
- recent mandated changes
- such as real-time-gross-settlement, RTGS,
- or PSD2 in Europe
- are opening opportunities
- for new business models
- on how your money
- can be received, sent, or spent.
- The fourth and final circle looks at the world,
- cross-border transaction and correspondent banking.
- As individuals, you may have experienced
- cross-border payments
- in the context of remittance,
- however, this only represents
- a very small fraction
- of the global financial transaction initiated
- and settled through payment network such as Swift.
- Finally, the payment module
- will open by introducing the development
- of a new payment stack
- which has been made possible
- by the advancement of a new technology
- such as DLT, distributed ledger technology,
- but also increasingly being justified
- by recent risks identified in the payment rail system
- that is now over 50 years old.
- This final module will provide you
- the basis of operation
- of a decentralised system,
- its difference with the current status quo
- and its potential to complement
- or replace the current infrastructure.
Module 2 Learning Objectives
Module 2 introduces the spectrum of electronic and other means of payment, from the traditional (cash) to the most recent (Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies). It highlights to learners the evolutionary context as well as the transformative role of new technologies in both traditional payments as well as alternative money and payment systems and the role of these in our daily lives and in our broader economies.
In Module 2, learners will:
- Consider the evolution of payment and money, from paper to digital to cryptocurrencies and beyond.
- Understand the underlying infrastructure of both traditional and new forms of payment.
- Understand how technology is transforming payment in developing countries and how it is changing payment in developed countries.
- Analyze the role of blockchain and cryptocurrencies in developing new means of money and payment.
2.2 Individual Payments
- We will now be looking at
- the evolution of payment
- from the perspective of usage of an individual.
- Most of us are using money
- to make and receive payments.
- However, technology has changed
- both the form of money takes,
- but also how it’s being transferred.
- In short, you can think of four phases
- that we will all discuss in more details.
- This first phase was barter.
- The second phase was commodity money.
- The third phase was coinage.
- And the fourth phase was dematerialized payments.
- The evolution of money
- as a mode of payment
- is over 10,000 years old.
- The first phase started in 9000 BC,
- up until 600 BC.
- It was the one of barter.
- People directly exchanged goods and services.
- There was no money as a standard
- or medium of exchange.
- This system, however, had limitations,
- including the capacity of carrying goods,
- and transporting it across long distances
- to make exchanges
- or standardise commerce.
- This evolved into the second phase
- of commodity money.
- With certain items being selected
- to perform transaction.
- For example, in 1100 BC,
- China used small cast replicas
- of goods, token, made out of bronze.
- However, you may be more familiar with
- example of other commodities being used,
- such as silver or gold.
- Even the word salary
- is actually related to that era.
- Back then, Roman soldiers were paid in salt
- and their salt was a salary.
- From 600 B.C.,
- coinage has been introduced in Lydia, today’s Turkey,
- but it will take another 1000 to 2000 years
- until paper money starts to be introduced,
- first in China, in the 700s,
- and then in Europe,
- with Sweden leading the way in the 17th century.
- Paper money represents an example of
- how technology, the printing press,
- allowed to store varying amounts,
- from one US dollar to 100 US dollar,
- on the same size of paper.
- In addition, European banks started to guarantee
- that the bearers of bank notes
- had to be paid in gold equivalent.
- One of the previous limitation of money,
- that it was light,
- and therefore flying away in the wind
- when you do commerce,
- became an advantage,
- because now instead of paying cargos
- with heavy bags of coins
- that were inconvenient and risky,
- you could pay with small bills
- that were light and stored a lot of value.
- The dematerialization of payment
- increased in speed and method
- from the 1950s onward,
- as technology has become more commoditized.
- Payment was increasingly digital,
- and the volume of non-cash transaction
- has been steadily rising ever since.
- Here is a timeline of how
- payment innovation has evolved,
- and with it, your behaviour.
- 1946, the first credit card is created
- with it before being popularised by
- card networks in the ’50s.
- The chequebook is introduced
- about the same period.
- In 1980s,
- the ATM network becomes
- interconnected and global
- with millions of withdrawal points available.
- In the 1990s,
- the EMV standard creation allows
- to enhance security
- and data storage on cards.
- In 2000, mobile money
- provides a payment solution in developing countries,
- or banking services in developed nation.
- The dot-com period
- and the rise of internet
- and e-Commerce companies
- has started the trend of complete digitization
- of cash transaction.
- Plastic cards have been replaced
- by e-wallets or virtual cards.
- But it kept on going.
- 2009, Bitcoin is created
- as a decentralised currency,
- stored across the internet.
- 2010, introduction of
- contactless cards and payments,
- which seven years later,
- are one of the most popular method of payment.
- 2015 onward,
- the popularisation of wearable devices,
- mobile wallets and cryptocurrencies continues.
- Payment methods have changed
- and with it all behaviours.
- From the Amazon supermarket without checkouts,
- to Venmo true-value proposition
- of not being a bill splitting app,
- but instead addressing the social stigma
- to request for money.
- Predicting the future of payment is difficult,
- and it is not anymore linked just to money,
- but to technology itself,
- that is changing the methods
- available to you.
- Indeed, cryptocurrencies
- were not even considered
- less then a decade ago.
- And even today,
- data is becoming the new oil
- and allowing a new type of barter system
- where people are giving
- their personal information,
- in returns of goods and services.
- Therefore, payment and money
- is constantly evolving,
- even more rapidly today.
- And we will point you toward
- the further reading materials
- for you to keep updated
- your knowledge on that sector.
2.3 Developing Countries and DFS: The Story of Mobile Money
- Hello, I’m Ross Buckley,
- the King and Wood Mallesons Chair
- of International Finance Law at UNSW Sydney,
- and I’m here to talk to you about
- the story of mobile money
- and digital finance in developing countries.
- I want to tell this story in terms of four questions.
- What? Where? How? and Why?
- So, let’s start with “What?”.
- What is mobile money?
- Well, it’s e-money.
- It’s an electronic credit on a mobile device
- that represents a unit of real money
- that typically sits in a trust account
- in a commercial bank somewhere.
- So, it’s an electronic representation of paper money,
- and that being electronic allows you
- to do all sorts of useful things with it,
- like save more readily,
- make remittances,
- send money back to your village,
- pay bills,
- do all sorts of things that
- otherwise would take you time
- and cost you more money.
- Where was it developed?
- Well, it came about because one day,
- telecommunications companies realised
- that their software tracked in real time airtime credits.
- They knew exactly how many minutes
- a prepaid customer still had in credit,
- and if they knew that,
- they knew how many currency credits the customer had.
- They realised this software could well adapted
- to do the same thing.
- And so, mobile money was born.
- Initially, in a in a few countries,
- including the Philippines,
- but it achieved lift off in Kenya a decade ago in 2007.
- It was a Vodafone product, M-Pesa,
- and within three or four years,
- the majority of Kenya’s GDP was flowing
- through M-Pesa every year.
- The “How” question, how does it work?
- Well, it’s based on cash-in and cash-out agents
- who are the same small shopkeepers who sell airtime.
- These are tiny stores,
- maybe three metres by three metres,
- by the side of the road
- that sell tinned meat and soft drinks,
- and cigarettes and airtime,
- and is also act as agents for the mobile money service.
- So, a customer can walk in,
- pass some cash across the counter,
- and get a credit
- that shows up immediately on their phone
- and they can walk away happy,
- knowing they’ve got
- some electronic money on their phone
- that they can do things with,
- that they couldn’t so readily do with the paper money.
- That’s one way a credit comes about,
- but the more often way is
- the government makes a transfer payment,
- a welfare payment directly to the phone,
- because paper-based payments
- have all sorts of problems for governments
- in developing countries,
- and electronic payments
- are a much more efficient method.
- Often, central banks will want
- this service offered by their banks
- because they trust the banks,
- they know the banks,
- they know how to regulate them.
- But, banks around the world
- are not typically good at providing services
- to poor customers.
- The entities that are already doing that
- are the TELCOs.
- They are very efficient at selling services
- to very poor people and generally,
- if you’re a government,
- you’ll get the innovation
- in the mobile money space
- from your telecommunications companies
- more than your banks.
- The fourth question is,
- why does it matter?
- And it matters because without electronic money,
- paying an electricity bill or a school bill
- can require a parent to take the whole day off work,
- travel for a few hours on a bus,
- stand in a queue for a few hours,
- travel a few hours home.
- This is not typically transformative
- for people who live in the capital city
- or in the big cities,
- it transforms the life of people
- who live in the countryside
- who don’t have access to bricks and mortar branches.
- It enables them to send money home to a relative,
- to save money safely,
- to pay bills in their microbusiness,
- whatever they need to do,
- to do it quickly and safely and cheaply.
- In some states in India,
- before mobile money was introduced,
- up to 45% of government welfare payments
- would go missing
- because you had a largely illiterate population
- and a paper-based system.
- The electronic auto trail of mobile money
- gets around that problem.
- In Papua New Guinea,
- teachers are regularly taking off days off school
- so they could cash their paychecks,
- before mobile money systems allowed them
- to get access to their pay without having to,
- again, get on a bus for a few hours
- to the nearest major town.
- The buzzword is financial inclusion.
- It’s about including these previously excluded people
- in the financial services
- and allowing them to do things more efficiently,
- and thereby promote economic growth
- and reduce poverty.
- What are the challenges with it?
- Well, it’s worked well in east Africa.
- Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda,
- it’s worked very well.
- In other places, the record is more patchy.
- In many countries,
- governments transfer payments
- to mobile money accounts,
- people go to the cash-in and cash-out agent,
- take the cash out, and then transact in cash.
- That fails to realise most of the goals
- of financial inclusion, you know,
- they’re not getting the efficiency benefits,
- you’re not getting the network effects,
- you’re not getting the vibrant ecosystem,
- and it also causes a real problem for agents
- because agents are mainly handing out cash,
- and unless the other part of their business
- provides them with a ready inflow of cash,
- they’re going to run out of cash often
- and they’re not going to be able
- to meet redemption requests,
- and then people get frustrated with the system.
- So, lots of people around the world
- are working to try and solve this.
- They’re working by developing
- new technological products,
- customer education programmes,
- or in the case of the programme I lead at UNSW,
- we work with central banks
- in partnership with the UN Capital Development Fund around the world,
- we work with poor country central banks,
- helping them get their regulation more adapted,
- more suitable to digital finance.
- But, there are main roadblocks
- to vibrant digital financial ecosystems
- in many countries,
- and one of the fundamental ones of these
- is a failure to adapt products to local needs
- and to understand local customer journeys,
- and I’ll discuss this with you later.
- Thank you.
2.4 Developing Countries and DFS: Regulation of Mobile Money
- Hello I’m Ross Buckley,
- the King and Wood Mallesons Chair
- of International Finance Law at UNSW Sydney.
- I’m here to talk to you about
- the regulation of mobile money
- and digital financial services in developing countries.
- The first thing we need to do
- with mobile money is keep it safe.
- We need to protect the float.
- The float being the body of actual money
- that represents the electronic credits
- on the mobile devices.
- In Common Law countries,
- this is relatively easy to do,
- using the institution of a trust.
- You have a trust deed which
- we’ve given you a version of
- in the publication that’s up on your slides.
- There’s a trust deed,
- either money is deposited
- under that deed in a commercial bank,
- and the deed provides for the role of a protector.
- The protector will typically be the Central Bank,
- although it could be somebody else.
- They will have the duty of
- inspecting the trust arrangements
- and insuring, most importantly,
- that there is a 1:1 ratio
- between issued electronic money
- and actual money sitting in the trust account,
- various other rights of the protector as well.
- And the protectee you need
- because the beneficiaries of the trust
- are the customers,
- they’re not going to understand all this,
- and they’re not going to enforce their own rights.
- So as I said, in common law countries,
- relatively easy to do.
- In Civil Law countries, not so simple,
- because usually the trust is not there.
- But you can get to the same end
- using a mix of mandates,
- contracts, fiduciary contracts,
- and sometimes direct regulation as needed.
- There’s no one size fits all solution
- for Civil Law countries,
- you need to craft a solution for each jurisdiction.
- But again on your slides,
- there’s an article that we’ve written,
- that you can easily draw down off SSRN,
- that deals with all of those technical issues.
- Once you’ve kept the float safe,
- there’s only two other, in my view,
- core pieces of regulation you need.
- One is Consumer Protection Regulation
- and the other is Money Laundering
- and Terrorism Financing Regulation.
- You need the latter because you need it.
- There’s an international regime
- that you eventually see a country on a blacklist
- if it doesn’t have adequate AML/CTF regulation.
- And the important thing to do in dealing with that,
- is to use proportional risk-based assessment.
- In most poor countries
- you are not going to be able to comply,
- you’re not going to be able to
- reach the very highest standards of
- Know-Your-Customer certification.
- You’re going to have to, you know, cut some corners
- and decisions are going to have to be made.
- But the international regime allows for that.
- The problem often is that regulators
- try to enforce standards that are higher
- than is required by the international regime
- and are not appropriate for their own countries.
- So we need a little bit of regulatory innovation
- and courage often in that space.
- Consumer Protection is
- essential for the substantive reason
- that without it,
- people won’t trust the system.
- If people are losing their money,
- they won’t keep using it.
- And mobile money and digital finance
- needs network effects.
- It needs a lot of people using it
- so that it’s beneficial for everybody.
- The easy part for consumer protection is rules.
- It’s relatively easy to craft a good set of rules.
- The difficult part is recourse mechanisms.
- People have got to have some way
- to get their problems solved.
- And any effective recourse regime, in my view,
- needs a free-to-call telephone number
- that’s manned a good number of hours a day
- by someone with authority
- to resolve customer problems.
- If people have to pay to make the call
- and wait a long time online,
- they’re going to hang up.
- If it’s a free call
- but it’s not answered for an hour,
- they’re going to hang up.
- They’re not going to get their problem solved.
- And central banks need to police this.
- Central banks actually need to
- sort of play the role of mystery shopper, I think,
- and pretend to be customers and find out
- how well these recourse mechanisms work.
- Because they’re really essential to consumer trust
- in a digital financial ecosystem.
- I also wanted to talk about the difference
- between FinTech in rich countries
- and digital finance in poor countries,
- because they come from quite different places.
- FinTechs in rich countries are typically startups.
- They’re young entrepreneurs seeking to get rich.
- Digital Financial Services in poor countries are partly,
- occasionally driven by that, but not so often.
- They’re mostly driven by government policy.
- Governments have embraced
- this idea of financial inclusion
- and they’re encouraging their banks
- and their telcos to provide it.
- So rich country regulators
- are trialling regulatory sandboxes,
- safe places in which entrepreneurs can take risks
- with reduced licencing obligations,
- and they’re trialling other measures
- to promote innovation.
- And in some poor countries,
- regulators are doing this,
- but something much more is needed
- of regulators in poor countries.
- And that’s a major mindshift,
- a major change of perspective.
- So that they actually get out of the capital city,
- they get into their own villages
- where these innovations are needed,
- and they talk to their own people and find out
- what the customers in their countries really need.
- Because this is what’s holding the development
- of Digital Financial Ecosystems up in many countries.
- It’s the offering of inappropriate products.
- These countries are small.
- The telecommunications companies
- naturally want to roll out the same products
- across multiple countries,
- but the local Central Banks’ role in part
- is to encourage the provider
- to adapt the product for the local market.
- And that’s a deeply different and innovative role
- for a central bank
- and one that they’re not accustomed to do.
- But experience teaches us if they don’t do it,
- it’s a real risk that the innovation will not thrive.
- We’ve written about the customer journey,
- we’ve written about building consumer demand
- for Digital Finance.
- You can find those references on the slides.
- So I just want to conclude by emphasising
- that for Digital Finance
- to flourish in many countries,
- a big change of mindset is required by the central bank.
- They will typically be the primary regulator,
- they’re typically very prudent,
- because their job is to preserve the safety
- and soundness of the entire system.
- But mobile money doesn’t typically
- raise systemic stability issues.
- It’s not a risk on that scale.
- It doesn’t need regulation of that weight.
- It needs light and subtle regulation,
- a maintenance of a watching brief
- principally by the central bank,
- and that requires a degree of regulatory courage.
- Thank you.
Additional Resource Insights
Please click the link to download the presentation slides for Video 2.4 Developing Countries and DFS: The Regulation of Mobile Money.
2.5 RTGS Systems
- We will now explain
- how Real Time Gross Settlement has benefited
- the development of FinTech Innovation.
- We will do so by introducing two use cases,
- one on the payment side,
- and the other one on the lending side.
- However, before we start,
- what is RTGS, or real-time gross settlement?
- In short, it allows for transaction between banks
- to happen in real time
- and settle on a one-to-one basis.
- This is to be contrasted with batch transaction
- where banks settle the net amount owed
- at a pre-determined interval
- such as the end of the day or the week.
- Practically, you may have already
- experienced this yourself.
- For example, if you are in Hong Kong
- and you wish to make a transfer
- to a friend who has an account
- in another bank as yours,
- if you initiate the payment transaction in the afternoon
- it will only arrive the following day.
- This is because
- the payments are processed in batch.
- However, if you are in the UK
- and viewing this course,
- you will know that bank-to-bank transfers
- are instant and free.
- This is because Faster Payment,
- or an RTGS equivalent,
- has been introduced in 2014.
- The necessity to move from
- a batch to a real time world
- is driven by two factors.
- Firstly, technological capacities,
- which have become more robust and scalable.
- Secondly, customer expectation of instant delivery.
- As we move to mail to e-mail,
- we remove latency and cost to communicate.
- The same was due to happen in payments.
- Because RTGS systems
- constitute a core component
- of any national payment stack,
- the reform process is slow
- and once engaged,
- takes decades to be fully implemented.
- And whilst the majority of countries
- have RTGS system in place,
- a few more large players are still coming,
- such as China and Australia.
- Now the question really becomes:
- How can RTGS support FinTech Innovation?
- And here are two use cases
- that we’ll now bring to you.
- First, peer-to-peer payment.
- The whole companies,
- such as Venmo in the US,
- that are facilitating payment transfer between individuals,
- can only fully be successful
- if real time payment actually happens.
- Think about this,
- if you were to split the bill with a friend,
- however that bill splitting
- and that request to a friend
- would take one day or more to clear,
- the gratification of being able
- to receive the funds straightaway would not happen.
- And therefore, the capacity of FinTech startups
- to process real time payment,
- either from within their account,
- or between accounts,
- becomes an important value proposition
- for their capacity to deliver
- a better user experience.
- The second example is peer-to-peer lending.
- RTGS is actually linked closely
- to the development
- of the peer-to-peer lending industry in the UK.
- You may see peer-to-peer lending as a method
- for people to borrow funds
- when they’re not credit worthy,
- and when banks do not want to lend them.
- However, research has shown
- that one of the core benefits
- of peer-to-peer lending,
- is not so much on the credit worthiness
- as well as the interest charged on the loan,
- but it’s the speed at which
- the loan is being delivered on your bank account.
- And this for example
- has been clearly seen in the UK.
- Some peer-to-peer lenders in the UK
- charge high interest on the loans they provide,
- and one of the questions was,
- why do people in the UK
- rather go on an online peer-to-peer lending platform
- and pay a higher interest rate,
- compared to what they would otherwise
- qualify on a high street bank?
- And the answer was speed and convenience.
- Once you are authorised
- to get a peer-to-peer loan in the UK,
- you would be credited on your account
- in the same second.
- As a result, the funds would be available
- for you to spend straightaway.
- And for the capacity of the peer-to-peer lender
- to make a bank-to-bank transfer instantly
- as soon as the loan has been approved,
- has only been made possible
- because of real-time gross settlement.
- In other words,
- RTGS in the context of peer-to-peer lending,
- allow for convenient and instant payment
- of the loan into the account of the borrower.
- Now if we go further,
- we can look at the evolution of
- payment mechanisms and options,
- and this will continue to keep on growing.
- For example, most recently
- the Bank of England
- will be opening the RTGS system
- to non-bank Payment Service Provider.
- This will further increase competition
- and therefore consumer
- will allow to have more innovation.
- And as FinTech start-ups
- will be able to deliver new payments methods.
- Not only this,
- but this schedule of reform
- planned for the UK
- will also include how Blockchain and API
- can be interfaced with their RTGS systems.
- In other words,
- RTGS represent a critical infrastructure layer
- supporting FinTech innovation
- even though you may not directly be aware of it
- as it operates in the background
- and serves as a payment rail.
2.6.1 The ABCDs of Alternative Finance (Part 1)
- In his 2014 letter to JP Morgan’s shareholders,
- Jamie Dimon famously issued a warning
- to its shareholders, employees
- and even traditional competitors.
- Silicon Valley is coming.
- At the bank’s investor day
- he added more colourfully,
- when I go to Silicon Valley,
- they all want to eat our lunch.
- Every single one of them is going to try.
- During the last few years,
- alternative finance is slowly transforming
- the offering of financial services
- and the providers of such services
- in two main ways.
- New business models
- and new technologies.
- It’s critical to understand
- the four key and interrelated technologies
- that have allowed alternative finance to flourish.
- These can be known as the ABCDs driving FinTech,
- namely, artificial intelligence, or AI,
- blockchain, cloud computing, and data.
- Let’s deal with each of them in reverse order.
- Banks for the longest time
- have relied upon and generated
- a tremendous amount of information.
- These include information from and about customers,
- their identity, their transactions,
- their net worth
- and even their relationships and location.
- Yet a lot of this has been gathered
- by using paper forms
- filled by customers and bank staff
- and not easily searchable
- or manipulated for analysis.
- The digitization of information
- from paper into data,
- from physical pulp to digital ones and “0”s
- means that such information
- can more easily stored,
- transmitted, searched, processed,
- analysed and displayed.
- This digitization allows for
- online capital marketplaces
- to be more easily created and operated
- where gatherers can more cost effectively
- process and analyse the data
- for those who need the capital
- and then display the relevant information
- on the new platforms
- for the potential providers of capital
- to make their own investment decisions.
- At the same time,
- digital form filling and tracking
- of the online customer activity
- allows both these online platforms
- as well as, virtual banks and e-brokerages
- to scale more quickly with less manual labour
- and space resources
- that would otherwise be required for,
- for example, traditional bank branch networks.
- Customer data includes online behaviour
- such as the time and location of logging in
- and transactions
- as well as, other online activities
- such as web browsing, e-commerce
- and social media use.
- Increasingly, offline behaviour
- is also being tracked through data
- from internet of things for IoT devices
- such as wearable smart watches,
- smart cars and smart home devices
- such as Amazon Echo.
- For example, in the world’s biggest retailer, Walmart,
- 2.5 petabytes of data every hour is processed.
- One petabyte is 10 bytes with 15 “0”s afterwards.
- The other has been called the new oil
- that is being bought and sold
- by gatherers and users
- and increasingly fueling the AI engine
- that we will discuss subsequently.
- In the past, businesses such as financial institutions
- had to build their IT systems
- using different enterprise level software
- that was developed or licenced
- at high cost over time
- and hosted on large servers on premises.
- With the advent of cloud computing,
- software resides at data centres on servers
- run by companies dedicated managing such servers
- which also provide value-added services
- such as cyber security protection.
- This means that new businesses
- such as alternative financial providers
- no longer need to dedicate high capital expenditure
- to expensive infrastructure
- and can focus on improving client experience
- and can dynamically scale their server usage
- in accordance with their rates of growth.
- Cloud computing also allowed
- new business models to blossom.
- Software as a service or SaaS businesses
- bypass the traditional vendor model
- of software development and sales
- that require marketing software licences
- at higher upfront fees
- and then again each time a new version
- or upgrade is introduced.
- Software that resides in the cloud
- can now be marketed at a lower upfront cost
- based on a subscription model.
- And software upgrades can be automatically
- made on a continuous basis
- which gives the client one less reason
- to switch vendors.
- This means that online capital marketplaces
- as well as, startup virtual banks
- like UK Starling Bank
- require less upfront cost
- to prototype new business models
- and user interfaces
- to roll out more quickly and cost effectively
- and to do the same
- when scaling to new jurisdictions.
- In addition, the cloud
- enables connected IoT devices
- to gather data and stream more services
- including financial services
- to customers through new interfaces
- like smart watches,
- voice-activated speakers
- and smart homes and smart cars.
- Cloud computing effectively allows
- for institutional level technology support
- to retail businesses
- whereby user customers can now transact
- on their office computer on the road
- via their smartphones or smart cars
- or at home in their pyjamas.
2.6.2 The ABCDs of Alternative Finance (Part 2)
- Distributed ledger technology or DLT
- continues to have an evolving impact
- on alternative finance.
- The oldest example of double-entry bookkeeping
- can be found in the publication in 1494
- of Franciscan Friar Luca Pacioli
- which allowed for reliable documentation
- of both creditor and debtor
- in a standardised manner.
- The white paper on Bitcoin
- by the mysterious Satoshi Nakamoto in 2008
- was similarly revolutionary
- in establishing a cryptocurrency that seeks to solve
- the double spending problem
- intrinsic in a currency
- based on software without the need
- of a trusted authority or central server.
- Nakamoto postulated a ledger that is distributed
- via a peer-to-peer network
- which records transactions
- by way of blocks.
- Each block is validated
- by different node computers in the network
- through solving cryptographic mathematical puzzles,
- or hashes, at which time a new block
- with a new cryptographic hash,
- timestamp, and data would be added to the chain
- which is transparent to all users.
- Data on the block is immutable
- and effectively cannot be altered
- unless all prior blocks in the chain
- are altered by consensus
- or agreement of the network majority.
- Blockchain is the underlying technology
- behind cryptocurrencies
- that have expanded dramatically beyond Bitcoin.
- In this way,
- this technology has created
- a new form of digital asset
- as well as a new alternative finance method
- to raise capital for new projects,
- with the so-called crypto exchanges
- comprising new forms of online capital marketplaces.
- In addition, blockchain technology could form
- the basis of new capital markets infrastructure.
- NASDAQ is using blockchain technologies
- to secure record keeping of ownership
- of private companies and transfers.
- In December 2017,
- Australia’s ASX announced that it would replace
- its stock exchange registry,
- settlement and clearing system
- with blockchain technology.
- An even more ambitious use of blockchain technology
- through the creation
- of distributed autonomous organisations or DAOs
- that allow for automatic execution
- upon specific conditions
- via smart contracts,
- with innovative governance mechanisms
- based on direct voting and consensus.
- If implemented to its fullest extent,
- DAOs and its efforts to disintermediate
- could impact not only the venture capital market
- but also the very concept of the joint stock company
- and even some functions of government.
- The term artificial intelligence was coined
- at the now famous Dartmouth summer research workshop in 1955.
- Two initial clarifications would be helpful.
- First, it should be noted that
- we refer to the narrow or weak AI
- that relates to algorithm performing specific tasks,
- as opposed to general or strong AI
- that reflect broader human intelligence
- and decision-making.
- Second, there are different strands within AI,
- including Natural Language Processing or NLP
- which relates to language, often written,
- and Machine Learning where
- systems learn from experience
- by being trained with data
- as opposed to being rules-based.
- There are many techniques within Machine Learning,
- including neural networks which comprise
- nodes of weighted interconnectedness
- inspired by the human brain, and deep learning,
- which refers to algorithms based on neural networks
- arranged in deeper layers.
- Computer vision for image recognition
- is a good example of machine learning.
- After a long so-called AI winter of lacklustre activity,
- AI has blossomed due to
- a confluence of events
- that made both Fortune and Forbes
- name 2017 the year of AI.
- First, instead of expensive large supercomputers
- required for the AI algorithmic processing,
- researchers started using
- relatively cheap graphical processing units or GPUs
- originally developed for video games
- with increased computational power
- when used in parallel.
- Second, data storage cost continues to fall
- while data is being gathering at alarming rates
- through online activity and connected devices,
- thereby allowing for
- more structured and unstructured data
- to be gathered, stored, and used
- to train the machines.
- Third, most major cloud companies,
- such as Amazon’s AWS, Google Cloud,
- Microsoft’s Azure, IBM Cloud
- and Alibaba’s Aliyun
- incorporate AI into their services,
- often including machine learning frameworks
- on some open source basis
- to allow their clients to experiment
- and incorporate into their operations.
- For example, AI is rapidly changing
- Alternative Finance user interfaces,
- from facial and voice recognition
- for biometric identity management
- to chatbots that can provide
- personalised recommendations.
- Algorithmic matching of needs,
- pricing, and predictive analytics are also being used.
- AI also allows some alternative finance companies
- to create new business models
- that focus on analytics of the customer data
- rather than building platforms
- to provide financial fund flow.
- For example, some Chinese companies
- which started primarily as P2P lending companies
- have pivoted to provide credit analysis and scoring
- that serve the marketplace lending
- conducted by institutional investors and lenders.
2.7 Building A New Stack
- In the 19th Century, we developed
- the current payment stack
- based upon physical money like gold,
- paper money representing gold,
- instruments like securities,
- negotiable instruments, checks,
- all cleared through a banking system
- that collected fund transfers
- and settled across the accounts of a central bank
- which was responsible for the monetary supply.
- Across the 20th Century,
- we digitised this system.
- We transformed it from a system
- which was based on physical analogue elements
- to a digital system of payments,
- of eventually, mobile payments, RTGS systems,
- and digital electronic payments
- totalling over five trillion US dollars a day.
- At the beginning of the 21st Century,
- we are applying a process of datafication,
- applying techniques of big data,
- artificial intelligence and other mechanisms
- to use the digitised data to transform
- the payment experience to provide
- a seamless mobile lifestyle experience.
- We however are now going further.
- We are looking at developing
- an entirely new payment stack
- through the use of technology.
- Technology today is no longer a barrier
- to redesigning a payment system.
- Instead, our existing institutional frameworks
- are the barrier and, looking forward,
- we can easily see an increasing use of
- real-time payments
- which could either take place
- across the banking system
- or new entrants like tech companies
- or directly eliminating the role of banks themselves,
- the idea of disintermediation,
- and we are actually seeing
- these processes in real life in the context of China
- with Alipay, with WeChat Pay,
- in the context of the UK
- and an increasing number of jurisdictions
- with faster payment systems
- allowing real-time, instantaneous payments
- between individuals and companies
- both through the banking system
- or outside of the banking system,
- and, looking forward,
- we can imagine
- how this fundamental payment infrastructure
- can be the base of a new stack based on payment
- supporting e-commerce,
- supporting lending,
- supporting investment.
- If we think of e-commerce,
- one of the fundamental killer apps to e-commerce
- is simple, digital, and in particular,
- mobile-based payment systems.
- On the basis of those mobile-based payment systems,
- one can also build digital lending frameworks
- both for consumer lending for individuals,
- as well as for small and medium-size enterprises
- using data analytics technology to collate data
- to do real-time cashflow analysis
- to determine credit worthiness
- and finally, pulling all of these pieces together,
- we can build systems of investment,
- systems which allow both individuals
- as well as the wider economy
- to better invest their funds
- in order to support the development of the economy.
- On the basis of this framework,
- we are also seeing
- an increasing number of jurisdictions
- led by the European Union
- developing what is called open banking.
- Open banking allows access to banking data
- and banking infrastructure by new entrants,
- by tech firms, by startups,
- and this poses a major challenge
- to the traditional model of banking
- and, at the same time as we look at digitising
- and datafying the system,
- we are also looking at new technologies like blockchain,
- and new forms of money and payment
- like digital currencies or cryptocurrencies.
Additional Video Resources: Cross-Border Payment
1. SWIFT Overview (2.49 Mins)
2. SWIFT for Banks (2.45 Mins)
3. The Future of Cross-Border Payments (2.27 Mins)
4. Watch Traffic for Banking: BI that gives you the edge (2.01 Mins)
2.8 Cryptocurrencies
- Hi there, time to talk about
- the very exciting topic of cryptocurrencies.
- You’re probably hearing of the cryptocurrencies
- in the news or the newspapers,
- or your friends are talking about it.
- And there’s definitely a lot of buzz around
- the broader cryptocurrency space globally.
- But first, what is a cryptocurrency?
- Well, a cryptocurrency is a digital asset
- that serves as a medium of exchange or store value
- that is generally based on a blockchain
- and you use cryptography as its security feature.
- What makes it quite interesting
- is that in many cases,
- it is not issued by any central authority
- rendering it in, let’s say,
- immune to government interference or manipulation.
- Well, what’s important to understand
- is actually cryptocurrencies are nothing new.
- People have been working on the topics
- since 1980s or ’90s.
- Many active groups were related to the military
- or more crypto-focused groups, like one of the,
- like the Cyberpunks, for example.
- But really, the big game-changer took place
- towards the end of 2008,
- where an individual, or a group of individuals,
- we don’t know yet, called Satoshi Nakamoto,
- published a white paper called
- “Bitcoin, A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System”,
- which was really the basis of Bitcoin.
- And Bitcoin was born.
- And a lot of things have happened since then,
- yeah, more today,
- more than 1,500 different cryptocurrencies in the market.
- But what was really innovative with Bitcoin is
- that it solved one of the big problems
- that we had at that point,
- which was the double-spending issue,
- the risk that a digital currency can be spent twice.
- Think about it, if I send you an email,
- there’s a copy of that email on my computer,
- and a copy on yours.
- Well, that’s practical for emails,
- that doesn’t go well
- if you’re actually sending money to somebody else.
- Or else, there’ll be an endless supply of money.
- And the beauty of Bitcoin is it was finally able
- to solve that double-spending problem.
- And that was a big game-changer.
- Over the years, as obviously Bitcoin has gathered
- increasingly more traction,
- it has its ups and downs,
- from a volatility perspective,
- or even government and public’s attention to focus on.
- But many would argue that the last year, 2017,
- was really the year that Bitcoin
- and other cryptocurrencies
- aimed to enter the mainstream and generate
- the really large amount of public awareness
- And many would say that
- we probably passed now the point of no return
- when it comes to cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin.
- And what is really exciting, people,
- is some of it’s features, for example,
- the Bitcoin is decentralised,
- has no central authority,
- it’s instantaneous, generally low-cost,
- it’s borderless,
- and you know, what’s quite interesting,
- has only a fixed supply.
- There will only be 21 million Bitcoin ever mined.
- While it has a lot of attractive features,
- it also has some challenges;
- for example, it’s still not very user-friendly to use
- for a general public.
- For example, if I have a bank account
- and I forget my pin, or I forget my password,
- I can always go back to the bank
- and try to get access to my account
- by showing them different pieces of ID.
- But if you’re trading cryptocurrencies,
- and you lose your private keys,
- well, they’re gone forever.
- There’re other reasons as well.
- For example, the electricity cost for Bitcoin
- is often heard to discuss
- that is actually not very environmentally friendly
- to actually mine Bitcoins.
- Well, a lot of people are working on the solution,
- and there’s different ways actually manage
- mining cryptocurrencies.
- Yes, this may be actually an issue for Bitcoins, per se.
- And the other more market-driven issues as well.
- For example, the volatility.
- Very difficult to pay for goods
- or argue for a value for goods in Bitcoin
- if the value is actually very volatile.
- What’s very, very important to understand
- is that each cryptocurrency out there
- has different characteristics and has different features,
- making them each one appropriate
- for certain type of transactions that you have.
- Whether it’s payment or as a store value.
- But what’s definitely clear is
- that the industry is really booming.
- As the beginning of 2018,
- there was more than 300 billion dollars
- in market cap in cryptocurrencies.
- And a lot of interesting developments
- were taking place as well.
- For example, we were seeing institutional investors
- enter the space,
- which is very interesting.
- Many of them are saying that
- this is actually the birth of a new asset class.
- We’re also seeing a lot of new crypto products.
- For example, asset-back crypto,
- where you have a crypto asset backed by
- real life assets like gold, cash,
- or securities, for example.
- And also, it’s becoming very interesting
- when we’re seeing a lot of central banks
- look at launching their own
- central-bank-backed digital currencies.
- So definitely an area to watch,
- and a lot of movement in this space.
- One thing we often say is
- whoever tells you they’re an expert in cryptocurrencies,
- you’ve got to run away.
- The space is moving so quick,
- that it’s very, very difficult to keep up.
- But, it’s definitely a very exciting area to be in.
- Hope this was a useful presentation
- and we’ll be back soon.
Industry Showcase (NEW*): Introduction to Digital Asset Market – Gatecoin
- Hi, everyone.
- I’m Brad, the Chief Operating Officer of Gatecoin.
- Gatecoin is a a Bitcoin and Ethereum token exchange
- designed for professional and retail investors.
- Today, I wanted to spend some time delving
- into a few topics around cryptocurrency exchanges.
- You might be wondering to yourself,
- why do cryptocurrency exchanges exist?
- So, for me, similar to stock exchanges,
- which issue in primary marketplaces securities
- to buy and sell,
- a crypto-marketplace is a place
- for people to buy and sell digital assets.
- Likewise, similar to a traditional exchange,
- where companies have the ability to raise new money
- through issuing securities or debt,
- a digital market exchange is a place where,
- through using instruments such as ICOs,
- companies can also raise money
- through pre-selling their revenue.
- Essentially, providing early stage companies
- and start-ups, a framework to raise money
- while avoiding regulatory compliance
- and other intermediaries, such as venture capitalists,
- banks, or stock exchanges.
- The regulatory attitudes and frameworks
- on both exchanges and ICOs
- vary wildly around the world.
- However, each exchange also has its own specific rules
- and regulations for trading and listing.
- While these standards often vary wildly
- from exchange to exchange,
- projects will need to meet specific criteria
- to foot the individual exchange
- before they actually list their tokens.
- ICOs of companies are done in a primary market,
- directly between projects and their investors,
- whereas subsequent trading in tokens
- and other digital assets, such as Bitcoin and Ethereum
- are executed in a secondary market
- directly between traders.
- The secondary market is
- often the most crucial component of the market,
- as the supply and demand in these markets
- drives the liquidity and the pricing of the tokens
- and other digital assets.
- There are different types of digital assets.
- So, from my perspective,
- there are two types of exchanges:
- a decentralised exchange and a centralised exchange.
- At Gatecoin, we’re a centralised exchange.
- That means everyone’s together.
- We have one central authority
- where your users will come on-board and trade with.
- A decentralised exchange is where users
- are actually generally working peer-to-peer,
- and there is no one central authority creating the rules
- or managing the system.
- To put it simply, while there’s a decentralised exchange
- and a centralised exchange,
- there’s also one differentiating facet.
- There’s the crypto to crypto and the fiat to crypto.
- In a crypto to crypto exchange,
- people credit their crypto onto the exchange,
- and they can trade between each other, crypto assets.
- In a fiat to crypto, people credit their fiat,
- or their real-world money such as Euros,
- Australian dollars, Hedge KD, or USD onto the exchange,
- and then they convert it
- or they buy and sell the digital assets.
- And they can also do it to crypto to crypto trading.
- So, how does a digital asset exchange differ
- from a traditional stock exchange?
- Here, we’ll have to look at it
- into three main characteristics.
- Custody, settlement, and trading-outs.
- For custody and settlement,
- a traditional stock exchange will act as the executor
- when the trade happens.
- However, custody and clearing are dependent
- on a broad network of trust partners, such as banks
- and other custodians and clearing houses,
- who will hold the assets on behalf of the traders.
- At this point, there are no regulatory requirements,
- and the fact that the industry’s still in
- it’s stage of development,
- digital exchange act more as a marketplace
- than an exchange, doing all three elements of execution,
- custodian, and clearing on each and every transaction.
- When considering trading-outs,
- traditional stock exchanges often begin
- at 9:30 in the morning
- and end at 4:00 p.m. at the end of the day.
- Digital asset exchanges trade for 24 hours,
- 7 days a week.
- Time in clearing is also a major difference,
- with the traditional exchanges often clearing
- on a T-plus-one or a T-plus-three cycle.
- Now, what that means is today plus three days,
- or today plus one day.
- Clearing, in a digital exchange,
- can nearly be instantaneous.
- There are different types of tokens.
- At the moment, there is no unified
- classification for tokens.
- However, we can still broadly classify tokens into several types:
- security, utility, real cryptocurrencies,
- which we could also call payment tokens,
- and potentially also, asset-backed.
- Simply put, securities tokens represent assets such as
- participation in real physical underlying companies,
- assets, earning streams, or an entitlement to dividends
- or interest payments.
- In terms of their economic function,
- the tokens are similar to equities, bonds or derivatives.
- The issuance of a security token is often called an SEO.
- When considering if a token is either a security
- or a utility, the key test will often be tax.
- Consider the token if it pays dividends, interest,
- or allows the claim of rights of ownership
- in the company or an underlying asset.
- If so, it’s likely to be a security
- and regulated in Hong Kong
- with a regulator such as the SFC.
- On the other hand, a utility token gives holders
- the access to services provided by the project,
- essentially prepaying
- or pre-purchasing the future project
- or service the company creates or delivers.
- Unlike securities tokens, utility tokens are not actually
- designed as investments,
- and this is why they do not currently fall under
- any regulatory restrictions yet.
- Other key questions is do the projects pay tax
- on the revenue of the funds raised on the projects
- or the projects to be delivered or services rendered?
- If so, it’s also likely to be a utility token.
- Cryptocurrencies or payment tokens.
- These are based on fundamental blockchains
- such as Bitcoin and Ethereum,
- and is often considered as a means of payment.
- Usually the tokens of these categories
- have no further functions or links
- to other developmental projects.
- Speaking broadly, the purpose of cryptocurrency
- is to be an item of inherent value.
- For instance, to cash or gold.
- They are simply designed to enable an exchange,
- be it a purchase, sales, or other financial transaction.
- They are intended to provide
- many of the same functions
- as long established currencies
- such as the USD, Euro or Yen.
- They do not have the backing of any government
- or any other other body.
- What makes a good exchange?
- There are many elements to look out for
- before establishing an account
- on a digital asset exchange.
- However, there are key elements I’d consider
- you should pay careful attention to first.
- We fundamentally believe
- there are two kinds of exchanges,
- those that have been hacked
- and those that will be hacked in the future.
- By the very nature of the industry that we’re part of,
- the people will keep trying
- to take advantage of security weaknesses.
- So don’t be surprised, be prepared.
- It’s very important to understand the security
- of the company and ask questions like,
- do you have a dedicated security team?
- How do you manage a platform?
- What are the security procedures or SOPs
- in your company to prevent you from being hacked?
- How can I remove my holdings off the exchange
- and back onto my own wallet?
- A higher liquidity in the marketplace is preferred
- since it brings about the following advantages,
- better and fairer prices for everyone.
- Market stability, quicker transactions,
- an increased accuracy for technical analysis.
- Also be aware that recent developments have shown
- that it’s possible for an exchange
- to take advantage or fake their liquidity.
- So also be cautious, and if it’s an exchange
- that’s gone from being a very low liquidity
- to one of the deepest markets in the world overnight,
- then ask yourself, does it all make sense?
- Finally, it’s clear that Bitcoin and Ethereum
- and many other cryptocurrencies are opening the doors
- to a new world of digital asset which we think
- has the potential to someday become
- a leading currency around the world.
- At the moment, even the oldest of cryptocurrencies
- are still maturing and only time will tell
- where this new asset class is heading.
- From what we can tell, there’s plenty of room
- for advancement both as an asset class
- and the market infrastructure needed to exchange it.
- Regardless of your predictions for the future,
- it’s hard to ignore that Bitcoin
- has already revolutionised the digital world.
Industry Showcase (NEW): Stablecoins (Feron Labs)
- Hi everyone, my name is Dmitri Senchenko
- and I’m the founder of Feron Labs.
- Today I am going to talk about cryptocurrencies
- with price stabilisation mechanisms,
- also known as stablecoins.
- Before we get into price stabilisation,
- let’s have a look at what makes for good money.
- The classic answer to this question
- is that money needs to satisfy three core functions,
- it needs to perform well as a medium of exchange,
- store of value and unit of account.
- So how do cryptocurrencies measure up?
- When talking about “medium of exchange”,
- we refer primarily to the ability to transact.
- Existing blockchains provide this functionality
- at a basic level, and the challenge today
- is to achieve commercial-grade speed
- and scalability without sacrificing decentralisation.
- A lot of talent and capital is being deployed
- at this problem, and significant progress
- is expected in the very near future.
- In terms of store of value, current technology by
- and large already allows cryptographically secure storage
- and retrieval of assets within a robust
- and durable distributed architecture.
- Ability to serve as a unit of account is linked directly
- to price stability, and this is arguably
- where cryptocurrencies are at their worst.
- Here, we enter the domain of monetary policy.
- All cryptocurrencies have one by definition,
- but they are quite primitive and obviously fail
- at their task.
- This is where stablecoins come in.
- They seek to achieve price stability
- through sophisticated monetary policy,
- and to implement it on blockchain protocols
- that fulfil the “medium of exchange”
- and “store of value” functions.
- This combination has the potential
- to become truly usable money,
- and to compete against conventional currencies
- in practically every facet of the economy.
- This goal is extremely ambitious,
- but there is no shortage of tech talent
- or venture capital ready to back it.
- Stablecoins are an extremely young and diverse field
- of research, but the majority of approaches
- to date can be divided into three categories.
- First, we have the fiat-collateralised models.
- You place fiat currency on deposit
- at a conventional financial institutions,
- issue a corresponding amount of stablecoins
- and institute a fixed exchange ratio
- between the two at the level of your target price.
- Stability is achieved through direct arbitrage
- between the market price and the exchange ratio.
- Such coins are, indeed, extremely stable,
- but they give up all pretence of decentralisation.
- They are completely hostage to the institution
- that holds their collateral and are little more
- than a technological extension to fiat money,
- much like a debit card.
- Next, we have the crypto-collateralised models.
- Instead of keeping fiat in a bank,
- you lock other cryptocurrencies in a smart contract.
- Now, you are dealing with volatile collateral
- that is no longer the same as the asset
- against which you’re stabilising.
- This has two major consequences.
- First, you can no longer have a fixed exchange ratio
- between your collateral and your stablecoin.
- Instead, you need to know how much your collateral
- is worth at any given time
- and to adjust the ratio accordingly.
- This is done by means of a price feed,
- which is a tool that delivers external market data
- into the blockchain.
- Secondly, you need to hold a substantial amount
- of excess collateral as protection against a decline
- in its value.
- Having to hold these risky assets
- through all market conditions carries a cost,
- which has to be levied somewhere within the system.
- Early results suggest that crypto-collateralized models
- can achieve stability under some conditions,
- but the key question is whether the cost
- of this stability can be made low enough
- for large-scale issuance and adoption.
- Finally, we have the uncollateralised models.
- Most of them build on the theory that a change in price
- can be counteracted by an appropriate change
- in money supply.
- For instance, if price declines by 10% and money supply
- is then shrunk by the same 10%,
- price should eventually revert to its original level.
- A simplified example of such a mechanism involves a pair
- of internally generated assets, a stablecoin
- and a volatile coin.
- The latter is an asset
- that confers some sort of a financial benefit,
- on its holder like interest or dividends,
- but is not price-stable.
- You then have a smart contract that receives signals
- from a price feed and offers to exchange appropriate amounts
- of stablecoins for volatile coins and vice versa,
- thereby shrinking or expanding money supply.
- While avoiding use of external assets
- can bring significant benefits, the trade-off here
- is reliance on very strong behavioural assumptions,
- leading to questions about stability
- and proneness to death spirals.
- In December of 2018,
- US regulators placed severe restrictions
- on algorithmic issuance of volatile coin-like securities,
- forcing a number of projects to rethink their mechanism.
- No stablecoin of this type has been launched to date.
- Feron Labs works on distinct approach
- within the uncollateralised category.
- We do not define stability relative to an external asset,
- or set an absolute price target.
- It is a single-coin model that consists
- of a native algorithmic central bank
- that offers users a range of riskless deposits.
- This opportunity to earn a riskless return attracts
- a significant portion of the system’s speculative liquidity.
- When price expectations decline
- and users want to sell their coins,
- they will first need to withdraw them from deposits.
- As the central bank detects increased outflows of capital,
- it sharply raised interest rates,
- offering a strong incentive to keep coins on deposit.
- Thus, liquidity is prevented from reaching exchanges
- and turning into sell orders, alleviating price pressure.
- In effect, price volatility
- is turned into the more benign interest rate volatility.
- So what is the ultimate goal of stablecoins?
- Arguably, it is creating a model that can function
- as fully self-sovereign money
- – money that is just as usable as conventional currency,
- but one that you, as the holder of the encryption key,
- truly own and control.
- It would be money that no institution
- can take away from you.
- Every transfer from your account would occur only if
- and when you give it your consent.
- In a way, it is the original Bitcoin dream,
- and Bitcoin’s early popularity
- has shown that it is a widely shared one.
Legal and Regulatory Implications of Cryptocurrencies (King & Wood Mallesons)
- Cryptocurrency is
- one of the most over-hyped terms of our generation.
- Cryptocurrency is also a bit of a misnomer.
- Very few cryptocurrencies
- operate in any way that resembles
- fiat or real central bank-backed currency.
- None are recognised in Hong Kong
- as currency or money.
- So some people like to call them virtual commodities,
- cryptographic tokens or digital assets,
- which are far more neutral,
- but we’ll stick with cryptocurrencies today.
- Let’s take a step back.
- What we typically mean
- when we talk about cryptocurrencies
- is a record of some kind of right,
- typically on a blockchain.
- That right can be transferred peer-to-peer,
- or via an exchange.
- It’s incredibly secure,
- but generally it’s not anonymous.
- It’s pseudonymous.
- So what does a cryptocurrency do?
- What is it?
- It entirely depends on
- what right travels along that blockchain
- as ownership passes from one person to another.
- In some cases, that right is really limited,
- particularly for cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin.
- In other cases, it could give you a profit,
- or even represent a share in a company,
- could be a loyalty point or help you
- make payments across the world.
- The combination of blockchain
- and smart contract technology,
- on platforms like Ethereum,
- as well as many others,
- has made the creation and trading of these rights
- incredibly efficient and lucrative
- as an early stage funding tool,
- a bit like what Kickstarter was
- for physical products.
- However, there is often a misconception
- that new technology,
- especially when it lives and breathes online,
- and particularly when it is decentralised,
- is not subject to any laws.
- It lives in the cloud, so no laws apply.
- This couldn’t be further from the truth.
- In fact, it typically means
- that much more law applies,
- and it often overlaps and sometimes even conflicts.
- At the crux is what is the right
- that I am recording on the blockchain?
- And this can have
- a number of legal and regulatory implications.
- However, the key things you need to look at
- are financial regulatory laws,
- such as restrictions on selling securities.
- In Hong Kong,
- an important part of the definition of securities
- includes collective investment schemes,
- which is a very broad concept
- and exists in many jurisdictions.
- It can capture a wide range of arrangements,
- but in essence, it generally refers
- to where you draw money in
- to generate profit for participants.
- In some countries, the securities definitions
- are so broad and flexible
- that they can adapt
- based on market behaviour and intent.
- The United States is a great example of that.
- In others, more law is emerging
- that expands the securities regimes.
- And in others such as Mainland China,
- total bans are in place for ICOs,
- but not necessarily blockchain-based shares
- and other instruments.
- Certain cryptocurrencies are regulated in other ways.
- For example, a gambling chip on a blockchain
- is still a gambling chip.
- An exchange selling cryptocurrencies that are securities
- is still a securities exchange that requires a licence.
- A blockchain that records
- and transmits personal data,
- is still regulated by privacy laws.
- In certain countries,
- cryptocurrencies are also treated like currency,
- which carries a lot of other consequences.
- But there are numerous other laws applied,
- such as contract and fraud.
- So if someone lies to you in an offer document,
- or over-promises on something
- that they cannot deliver,
- you could potentially sue them.
- And we are already seeing a number private actions,
- and in some countries even class actions in this space.
- Tax and anti-money laundering laws also apply.
- The greater issue is how these laws interact.
- Blockchains typically exist in multiple countries,
- because their records are
- duplicated in different servers
- in different parts of the world.
- So extreme care is required in creating them,
- and we’ll see a lot more interesting law
- develop to resolve laws that collide.
Industry Showcase (NEW): Behaviour Analysis and Valuation of Cryptocurrencies (Santiment)
- Hello, my name is Maksim,
- and I’m a Founder and CEO of Santiment.
- Our goal as a company is
- to give our users 360 degree overview
- of the entire crypto market
- and its biggest driving forces.
- Now, since crypto markets are so novel,
- and the technology behind it so unique,
- I believe we can no longer rely
- just on the traditional metrics and fundamental data.
- So what do we do at Santiment?
- We supply our users with terabytes of
- related data
- for the cryptocurrency from various sources.
- What are the sources?
- For instance, we gather data
- directly from the blockchains,
- like Bitcoin, Ethereum, and so on.
- Or we get social data about the project
- taken from Reddit, Twitter, telegram channels
- or even from some specific forums
- like Bitcoin Dock.
- We also gather developer activity
- data for crypto projects,
- from say, GitHub repositories.
- And then, we don’t stop here.
- We also build custom metrics from this data,
- to visualise different market behaviours.
- Today, I’ll show you a few of these metrics
- that probably no one else has shown you before.
- And first, for the quick disclaimer,
- I’m not an financial advisor,
- and nothing I share with you today
- should be taken as direct investment advice.
- It is just to give you real-life data
- to show the case.
- The crypto market has been in a long term,
- like more than one year,
- bear market, or a correction.
- Some people call it correction.
- Valuing crypto assets is a very challenging task.
- For, such as most tokens or coins,
- are supposed to have a primary purpose,
- more than just trading,
- like to have to be some utility.
- Unfortunately, as it’s still not the case,
- majority of the projects struggle in this mass adoption,
- and it is very focused on the crypto community,
- and the use of the tokens are still mostly speculative,
- and this situation can be very hard to accurately
- valuate a crypto asset.
- From market projections or valuations,
- you can see more clearly,
- and in the lifetime, what’s happening to the project.
- Just like in traditional markets,
- when humans deal with things of value,
- they become greedy or they can experience fear,
- like in crypto we call it FOMO,
- fear of missing out,
- but they rarely stay put
- and act rationally.
- In the crypto, as interactions
- get recorded on the blockchain,
- so, whenever people act,
- everything’s recorded on blockchain,
- and it’s a unique chance, the first time in history,
- then we can analyse,
- and this data is available to everyone.
- It’s just a question how you
- gather and package together.
- So let’s start with some examples,
- and the first example will be
- of how metric is so-called MVRV Ratio.
- MVRV Ratio, it’s calculated by dividing
- Total Market Cap by so-called Realised Cap.
- And the Realised Cap, it’s a very unique measurement.
- It’s total acquisition cost,
- or the total amount of money
- that all token holders paid
- for the tokens they currently hold in their wallets.
- And the ratio between current market value
- and acquisition cost is MVRV Ratio.
- So here is a MVRV Ratio for Bitcoin.
- The ratio itself is in yellow,
- and the price is in green.
- As you see, in the moment,
- the MVRV is less than one,
- actually around zero, comma, 85,
- which means there’s a current valuation,
- of the entire network,
- is less than the amount the token holders paid for it.
- Think for a moment.
- It’s kind of irrational.
- People paid more what market now values as the price,
- but this is the reality,
- and this is not the first time.
- Looking back in the history,
- you can see on the chart,
- and we saw MVRV fell below one
- at the end of 2014,
- when the Bitcoin dived below 300,
- and stayed there for actually quite long time,
- almost one year,
- and in the range of
- between 200 and 300 dollar per Bitcoin.
- As we know now,
- that time was perhaps
- one of the best accumulation periods.
- So if you believe, and we do believe,
- that crypto markets are in a cyclical mode,
- similar to traditional markets,
- here again, we need to remember
- the cycles in cryptos are much faster and tighter,
- MVRV right now, dived below one,
- somewhere back in November,
- 2018, when the Bitcoin went below,
- all the way down to three and a half thousand.
- If we believe market cycles,
- and we see the cycle appearing,
- alone, this metric can give you
- much deeper insight and understanding
- of behaviour of the crypto currency,
- token like Bitcoin.
- And they have this metric, actually,
- for other coins too.
- Now, let’s look at some other metric.
- We call it Ethereum Miners Statistics.
- It’s a completely new way
- to measure the behaviour of network participants.
- You will never find it in traditional finance.
- This chart illustrates activity
- of Miners of the Ethereum network.
- The green line is the price, again,
- is newest dollar per Ethereum token,
- and the red line is a total balance
- of all Ethereum Miners.
- It means how much Ethereum tokens
- they hold in their balances.
- Now, if you look carefully, you will see that,
- after year of stagnation in a long bear market,
- the market changed,
- and the price of Ethereum started to increasing
- back in 2017.
- Now, typically, when that happens,
- a rational person would think,
- “Oh. price is increasing, of course,
- so I’ll keep it; I will become rich,”
- but this is not how the human mind works.
- You’ve experienced one year of depression,
- and one year of suffering,
- and you’ve seen your money,
- like, decreasing in value,
- so the first direction,
- how you emotionally do,
- emotion like irrational,
- and this describes your behaviour,
- you’ll start selling, and dumping,
- like to get some money back.
- And you see it on the chart
- directly how it happens.
- The price starts increasing,
- but the Ethereum Miners holdings are decreasing,
- and it happens for some time, actually,
- for three or four months.
- Well I call it,
- and it is actually a quite known term,
- there is so-called Wall of Worry.
- Wall of Worry, where market grows in value,
- but people still don’t believe in it.
- But few months later,
- the price still keeps rising,
- and you see, the Miners were like,
- “Wow, now I guess it’s something for real,”
- and their holdings start increasing,
- from some specific point of time.
- If you’ll very carefully look at the chart,
- you’ll see that’s exactly the time when
- the price of Ethereum coin
- has some kind of lost and dropped.
- And after this, when it start increasing,
- their holdings for Ethereum Miners were increasing.
- This is the moment of recognitions.
- The whole market recognised
- there is something really big going on,
- and ever since I see the chart,
- the holding of Ethereum Miners only increasing.
- So, as you can see,
- Santiment data can be used by anyone
- who wants to understand
- how crypto markets work,
- how human natural participants
- react to market changes,
- and it’s both educational and pragmatic.
2.9A What is Blockchain? (Part 1)
- Cryptocurrencies, blockchain, ICOs.
- These are three terms
- that are in the headlines daily all over the world.
- Blockchain is the underlying technology
- which came to prominence with
- the launch of Bitcoin in 2009,
- but what is blockchain?
- Blockchain combines two long-standing
- technological developments.
- On one side, distributed ledger technology,
- and on the other, cryptography.
- If we look at Bitcoin, if we look at cryptocurrencies,
- cryptocurrencies at their base
- are blockchain systems combining
- distributed ledger systems and cryptography.
- Distributed ledger system,
- what is a distributed ledger system?
- For a system like Bitcoin,
- the distributed ledger
- means that the information in the system
- are not stored in one single place.
- Rather, they exist in multiple locations,
- multiple identical ledgers
- throughout the users of the system.
- So, if we think about this idea of ledgers,
- the traditional example is to think
- of something like a bank.
- A bank is a place where
- a certain amount of money is stored,
- it is a single place,
- it is a silo, it is a single ledger.
- At the other extreme, are distributed ledgers.
- Distributed ledgers mean that there is no single place
- where the information, the valuables,
- the data are stored,
- rather they are stored
- across a variety of identical locations.
- In between these structures of
- centralised and distributed,
- we also have network-based structures
- where perhaps you have a single centralised structure
- and a variety of spokes,
- a hub and spoke structure
- whereby the individual spokes connect to the hub.
- So, distributed ledger technology
- combined with cryptography.
- Cryptography is a technology that involves
- the secure storage,
- the encryption of information.
- It has a very long history with important points
- going back to code breaking,
- particularly in the Second World War.
- If we combine distributed ledger technology
- with cryptography, we have a system
- of secure distributed ledgers
- where entries have to be proven,
- proven through the use of a variety of structures
- which then encrypt the data into blocks.
- So, transactions 1 through 50,
- packaged in a block, encrypted together.
- The next set of transactions build on that first block,
- transactions 51 through 100
- encrypted as a second block.
- This structure provides
- a number of very important attributes
- to a blockchain-based system.
- In particular, it provides for security.
- The layers of cryptography across multiple blocks
- make it very hard, but importantly not impossible,
- to necessarily break those blocks
- making blockchain potentially a highly secure system.
- Second, it’s a permanent system.
- In other words, each of those transactions
- is recorded permanently in each of those blocks.
- That means that there is always a traceable history
- of all of the financial transactions
- going back to the very beginning.
- So, with each Bitcoin,
- you can trace back the life of that Bitcoin
- from it’s creation and into each account
- that it has been transferred to over time.
- And finally, transparency.
- Transparency means that the combination of visibility
- allows you to see what is happening in the blockchain.
- This combination of security, permanence,
- transparency, makes blockchain a potentially
- very powerful platform technology
- across a number of areas.
2.9B What is Blockchain? (Part 2)
- Now, if we look at blockchains,
- within this general structure
- we will often have a third level added.
- So, DLT plus cryptography plus smart contracts.
- What are smart contracts?
- Smart contracts are automated systems
- that on the occurrence of pre-determined actions
- something else happens.
- If I provide A, you provide B
- we pre-agree that A and B will be added together
- to create a new C,
- and this occurs on an automatic basis,
- this is a smart contract.
- There is an old joke that smart contracts
- are neither smart nor contracts,
- they are not smart because they are automated,
- they happen automatically,
- on the occurrence of something / events.
- And they are not necessarily contracts,
- but that is a more complicated legal question for later.
- Within this idea of blockchain,
- we can also add in a second important determination.
- Blockchains can either be
- permissionless, or permissioned.
- A permissionless blockchain, like bitcoin,
- means that it is open,
- anyone can participate that downloads the software.
- You download the software, you become a node,
- you’ll have a full picture of the ledger,
- that distributed ledger is distributed to your node,
- anyone can enter.
- But, we also have what are called
- permissioned blockchains.
- A permissioned blockchain,
- involves requirements or governance structures
- or restrictions on entry.
- In other words, only individuals or organisations
- or computers or devices which have been pre-approved
- can join into the network,
- can access the information
- and can potentially contribute transactions.
- Now, when we think about blockchain,
- it may or may not involve cryptocurrencies.
- A cryptocurrency will involve a blockchain,
- but a blockchain does not necessarily
- involve a cryptocurrency.
- In other words if we think of a blockchain based system
- at its base, it is a distributed ledger
- which is encrypted, maybe with an additional layer
- of smart contracts on top.
- Those individual data entries, can be anything.
- The communications between those data entries
- do not necessarily involve any sort of currency.
- One of the most interesting and powerful applications
- for this sort of thing,
- is in production processes,
- the food market where the providence of a chicken,
- or a bottle of whiskey
- can be proven by the blockchain system
- from its creation, its history, its movements
- documented throughout that system.
- So, any eventual possessor
- can document both the origin
- as well as the lifespan of that particular chicken,
- bottle of whiskey, diamond, artwork,
- whatever it may be.
- And that is the real power of blockchain.
- To build systems
- which are potentially highly secure,
- permanent and highly transparent.
- But, blockchain is not the solution
- for every problem, why?
- Because not every blockchain is created equally.
- not every blockchain is necessarily secure.
- Big blockchain systems like Ethereum or Hyperledger
- or R3’s quarter, or bitcoin,
- these are highly secure.
- But if I create a blockchain in my basement,
- probably not that secure.
- Just because it’s a blockchain, doesn’t mean it’s secure.
- Second, from the standpoint of
- permanence and transparency,
- this raises two problems.
- One, is the garbage in, garbage out problem
- in other words if you put that information in,
- it’s in there forever, and that is a big problem
- in the context of building histories,
- building information, the permanence problem.
- And finally, privacy concerns.
- If information goes into,
- a permissionless public blockchain,
- that information may be permanently
- on public display and access,
- and this can create all sorts of problems
- in that not necessarily do we want
- every piece of information permanently on view.
- So, looking at blockchain,
- and this is something that we talk about
- a great deal throughout this course,
- and in other courses.
- Blockchain is a very important technology,
- being used across all aspects
- of the financial sector and beyond.
- But it’s not the solution for every problem,
- but it is giving us an excuse to re-look,
- to reconsider many of our existing systems
- and infrastructure to build better systems.
Additional Video Resources: Blockchain
1. Meet Corda: DLT with a difference (www.corda.net) (2.1 Mins)
2. Corda Overview (Richard Gendal Brown, Chief Technology Officer of R3) (2.5 Mins)
3. Bridging the FinTech Gap – An Update on R3 and Blockchain Developments (Tim Grant, CEO of R3 Lab and Research Centre) (27.2 Mins)
Industry Showcase: The Benefits from New Payment Stacks – Applications of Ripple for Standard Chartered Bank
- Standard Chartered Bank
- believes in using new and advanced technologies
- to bring a better experience to our clients.
- Since our first collaboration with Ripple
- in December 2015,
- we have made significant progress
- in enhancing the overall security
- of trade finance invoicing through the adoption of
- distributed ledger technology.
- We, together with Axis Bank,
- launched a cross-border payments platform in 2017
- which connects corporates
- between Singapore and India.
- Ripple allows Standard Chartered
- to provide our clients real-time payment services
- with visibility, traceability and full transparency.
- With all transacting parties
- connecting to the same blockchain network,
- customers are able to process payments in real-time
- with end-to-end tracking,
- pre-validated transaction,
- and see all the fees upfront.
- It helps reduce the risk of late payment
- as well as to provide certainty
- as to when and how much of the money
- would arrive at the beneficiary.
- As blockchain records cannot be altered
- once they are created,
- the technology helps
- financial institutions’ reconciliations of payments,
- improve working capital allocations
- and reduce the amount of time
- back-office staff spent handling errors.
- Standard Chartered has been using Ripple’s solution
- in many parts of its business,
- including global trade payments,
- e-commerce payments,
- international payroll and pensions,
- and international corporate dividends.
- Whether it is a global supply chain
- doing real-time cross border transactions,
- a corporate selling goods globally over the Internet
- or an international firm paying salaries
- to its overseas employees,
- Ripple makes payment easier, faster,
- and more efficient than ever before.
Additional Resource Insights
A. References and Suggestions for Further Reading
- FinTech and Financial Services: Initial Considerations (Industry Report – IMF)
- Blockchain Beyond the Hype – A Practical Framework for Business Leaders (Industry Report – WEF)
- Bank of Russia suggests FinTech’s ethereum blockchain as single system for EAEU (News Article – Tass Russian News Agency)
- The Distributed Liability of Distributed Ledgers: Legal Risks of Blockchain (Academic Paper: Zetzsche, Buckley, Arner)
B. Additional Resource Insights for Video 2.4 Regulation of Mobile Money
- FinTech in Developing Countries: Charting New Customer Journeys (Academic Paper: Buckley, Webster, 2016)
- Building Consumer Demand for Digital Financial Services – The New Regulatory Frontier (Academic Paper: Malady, Buckley, 2014)
- Using Trusts to Protect Mobile Money Customers (Academic Paper: Greenacre, Buckley, 2015)
- Protecting Mobile Money Customer Funds in Civil Law Jurisdictions (Academic Paper: Muñoz, Solana, Buckley, Greenacre, 2015)
Module 3 Alternative Finance
Welcome to Module 3
3.1 Module 3 Introduction
- Hi, my name is Brian Tang,
- and I’m the founder of
- Asia Capital Markets Institute based in Hong Kong.
- I’ve been a corporate finance lawyer for nearly 20 years,
- having worked in New York and California
- during the dotcom period
- at Wall Street firm Sullivan & Cromwell,
- as well as, at Credit Suisse
- where I worked on some of the largest
- and first-of-its-kind transactions.
- These included the IPOs of CCB and ICBC,
- the privatisation of alibaba.com
- and the setting up Credit Suisse’s investment banking
- joint venture in China.
- And since I was in Silicon Valley,
- and now at a FinTech-focused startup,
- I think I can just lose the tie.
- Alternative finance, according to the
- Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance,
- can broadly be described as
- comprising financial channels and instruments
- that emerge outside the traditional financial system.
- In my chapter in The Fintech Book,
- which has recently been translated
- and published in China,
- I have called some of these emerging
- financial channels, online capital marketplaces.
- Alternative finance can also refer
- to the new investment classes
- being sought to be created,
- including equity and loans to SMEs,
- and more recently, crypto assets.
- In this module, we will discuss the following.
- First, a brief history of finance and its innovations.
- Second, the digitization of financial services.
- Third, the opportunities and challenges
- of distributed peer-to-peer models of finance,
- such as crowdfunding,
- marketplace lending and token sales.
- Fourth, the rise of the Chinese TechFins
- in its new models and products.
- And five, how the banks are now positioning themselves
- as technology companies.
Module 3 Learning Objectives
Module 3 addresses the digitization of finance and investment and the development of alternative finance and investment mechanisms, including P2P lending, crowdfunding and initial coin offerings (ICOs).
In Module 3, learners will:
- Understand the digital transformation of traditional securities and investment markets over the past 30 years.
- Consider the major forms of technology impacting finance today.
- Analyze the evolution of major forms of alternative finance, including P2P and marketplace lending, crowdfunding and initial coin offerings (ICOs).
- Learn about new business models, particularly the impact of technology firms entering into finance.
3.2 A Brief History of Financial Innovation
- Finance can and should be
- an enabler of commerce and investment
- in growing the real economy
- as well as to provide individuals
- with more personal security
- against life’s vicissitudes.
- Money or currency consists of
- a stored value instrument that is scarce.
- Throughout the ages,
- these have ranged from cowry shells
- to gold and minted metal coinage.
- In the west,
- money lenders have existed since the Roman Empire
- where individuals have made
- private loans to those who needed it.
- There has long been widespread
- religious and moral condemnation against usury.
- The charging of interest for loans
- with different religions taking different stances
- on the permissible extent of such interest.
- For example, the Islamic faith prohibits
- any charging of interest whereas
- the Judaic faith permits charging interest to non-Jews.
- Modern legislation focuses more on setting limits
- on the amount of permissible interest set.
- Florence sat at the centre of the Renaissance
- due in part to the extensive trade
- through the Italian city
- leading to over 100 banks being there
- by the end of the 14th Century.
- The Medici banking empire
- was one such example
- and was the banker for the Catholic Church.
- Its expansion was aided by the invention
- of double-entry bookkeeping by
- Franciscan friar, Luca Pacioli
- which allowed for reliable documentation
- for both creditor and debtor.
- The important role of ledgers
- will be revisited with the advent
- of blockchain technology in this century.
- The Tang and Song Dynasty emperors
- in the seventh century started using paper
- which their forefathers in China invented
- as bank notes or jiaozi,
- that were originally used as promissory notes
- and became a lightweight alternative
- to heavy and metallic coinage.
- To address counterfeiting,
- a variety of techniques involving different inks,
- papers and seals were used.
- Property and being able to prove ownership
- is critical as sources of collateral for finance.
- Pawn shops such as the medieval practise
- of so-called Lombard banking
- dealt in the delivery of goods and custody
- and many legal jurisdictions developed
- centralised land record registries
- that enabled more lending to take place.
- As international trade grew,
- the financing of those ocean expeditions
- of vast durations and distances
- involved substantial risk.
- With the invention of the joint stock company
- shares and bonds could be
- issued to the general public to fund projects
- and the Dutch East India Company
- listing in the Amsterdam Stock Exchange
- paved the way in the 17th Century.
- Similar venues were set up across the ocean
- at coffee shops along London’s exchange alley,
- and under a buttonwood tree on Wall Street,
- and sea captains and merchants also met
- at Lloyd’s Coffee House at London’s Tower Street.
- These soon evolved into powerful institutions,
- today’s London Stock Exchange,
- New York Stock Exchange
- and Lloyd’s of London
- with impressive architecture to reflect their influence.
- Within these buildings,
- trading runners or deer would dash to
- nearby brokerage offices
- to deliver stock quotes
- from the brokers on the exchange floor.
- With the invention of electricity,
- technologies like the telegraph
- and then the telephone soon meant
- proximity to the exchanges proved less critical.
- In 1971, Nasdaq became the first electronic exchange
- with many other securities and
- commodities exchanges following suit.
- A new electronic and digital era was dawning.
3.3 Digitization of Financial Services
- Financial investment and trading
- can best be understood as
- comprising of two groups.
- First, retail investment and trading
- of public companies is conducted
- by the general public on exchanges
- through brokers and dealers.
- Second, institutional investment and trading
- involves large financial institutions
- who buy and sell publicly listed securities
- between each other.
- In the meantime,
- the investment into private companies
- has been the remit of specialised investors,
- such as venture capital and private equity firms,
- with so called exit or liquidity events
- being an initial public offering
- into the public markets
- or trade sale of the business.
- The venture capital firms
- on Sand Hill Road in Menlo Park, California,
- were likely instrumental in investing and growing
- what become known as Silicon Valley.
- Including their successes in hardware
- being turned into software and the internet
- that gave rise to the dot com boom.
- One major development at that time
- was when online brokerage firm E*Trade
- was able to get allocations
- to some of the hot tech IPOs.
- Electronic banking also started expanding
- as major banks extended services to consumers
- who were increasingly coming online
- with the lowering costs
- and increasing ease of access.
- At the same time,
- institutional trading expanded dramatically,
- with alternative trading systems and dark pools
- allowing financial institutions to trade
- large blocks of securities at one time
- to minimise pricing impact.
- At the same time,
- proprietary trading at desks invested and develop
- automated algorithmic trading programmes,
- as well as high frequency trading programmes
- that use computational power
- to devise trading strategies
- and automate trading in ways no human could.
- The global financial crisis in 2007
- changed the landscape dramatically.
- After the bursting of the sub prime mortgage bubble,
- and the rapid devaluation of financial instruments,
- such as mortgage backed securities
- and credit default swaps,
- many major financial institutions collapsed,
- or needed to be bailed out by their governments.
- Lending then dried up by many traditional lenders,
- and many governments sought to encourage
- the emergence of new players and business models
- that provided alternative finance
- to individuals and businesses.
- At the same time,
- 2010’s flash crash
- saw the Dow Jones Index drop
- nine percent within minutes
- and was subsequently attributed
- to high frequency traders initialling,
- spoofing algorithms
- that placed thousands of orders
- with intention of cancelling them.
- The automatic shutting down
- of many automated computerised traders
- due to the extreme drop
- also led to a rapid loss of liquidity.
- In the European Union,
- challenger banks were encouraged
- and has culminated
- in open banking policies such as
- the payment services directive,
- which forces banks to produce customer data
- to make it easier for customers
- to switch financial providers.
- Some of these banks were also virtual banks,
- with no branches at all.
- In the United States,
- a stark reminder that
- it was not business as usual
- can be seen in the before and after pictures
- of UBS’s famed trading floor in Stanford, Connecticut.
- This was once the largest in the world
- with 5,000 stock, bond and currency traders.
- The global financial crisis resulted,
- amongst other things,
- in the passing of Dodd-Frank,
- which prohibited proprietary trading by banks,
- and the Jump Start Our Business Startups Act,
- or JOBS Act in 2012,
- which legitimised the concept
- of equity crowdfunding in law.
- The era of distributed peer-to-peer models
- of finance was born.
3.4 FinTech and Funds
- As we all know, FinTech is really disrupting
- many verticals of the financial services industry,
- from investment banking,
- asset management, retail banking.
- But one area that it’s also affecting as well
- is the hedge fund industry.
- For many years, the hedge fund industry
- was the most entrepreneurial,
- at the cutting edge of technology.
- And obviously, a lot of Fintech innovations
- are benefiting the broader hedge fund industry as well.
- There’s many examples.
- Think about it.
- Imagine I’m a fund manager.
- Normally I try to access data
- that is available publicly
- and I’m trying to use.
- But what if I can use some of the big data analytics
- and artificial intelligence solutions
- to try to really generate insights?
- Imagine using satellite imagery to try to look at
- what’s happening on, let’s say, on oil containers
- and how much oil there are on the ships.
- Or actually looking from satellite imagery
- how many cars are in the parking lot
- and use that to try to actually forecast
- a company’s actually earnings.
- Or imagine being able to use
- some of the latest technology to read,
- go through all the news articles
- around the world available online
- or all the tweets and Facebook messages
- and be able to come up with a sentiment analysis
- of what are people really seeing
- and thinking around the world.
- Well, what’s really interesting as well,
- that’s one example
- but there are many other examples.
- For example, today a lot of people
- want to get access to research.
- A normal hedge fund manager would actually try
- to work with an investment bank,
- will actually execute some of their traits
- via an investment bank to get access
- to some of their research analysts.
- But if you think about it,
- it’s not very efficient.
- It’s a bit like buying a CD if you like one song.
- What now we’re seeing the emergence
- of independent platforms.
- If you think about the Spotify of research
- where investment analysts can actually go there,
- put your own research.
- And if customers like them,
- they just go pay for the research and pay
- for that specific investment analyst.
- A bit like if there is a particular song or artist
- that you like on Spotify and
- you actually want to listen to their music.
- But in many cases we are seeing
- really the FinTech industry transform
- how business was currently done.
- Let me give you an example.
- Let’s say I want to launch a quant fund,
- a quantitative trading fund.
- Today I have to rent the office space,
- hire a couple of PhDs who’ll do research
- and build my team together with me in one location.
- That is a great way but doesn’t really give you access
- to the best talent in the world.
- What if you can actually crowd source
- and actually crowd fund
- and be able to get access
- to talent from all around the world?
- Some of the best PhDs or quant traders
- from around the world and try to get their models
- that you can actually use.
- Well, we are seeing some players do exactly just that.
- Well now you can launch a quant fund
- where you going to get some of the best people
- from all around the world
- to actually submit models.
- And if the model is quite successful,
- give them portions of the revenues made.
- Doesn’t matter if you are in Santiago, Chile,
- in Moscow, Russia or in Singapore, Hong Kong.
- You can have as much of a chance of
- being discovered from a talent perspective.
- But also it’s affecting,
- FinTech is affecting the way business is done.
- Today, anybody launches a hedge fund or a fund,
- will generally try to go raise money from investors.
- That service is now offered by investment banks
- who will try to match hedge fund managers
- and hedge fund investors.
- The way that process works is very inefficient.
- Often via conferences and
- personal meetings or emails,
- it’s actually not very efficient.
- We are now seeing the emergence of online platforms
- where these two branches can actually connect.
- And actually you have analytics
- and data on who can be a good fit for each other.
- So as you can see there’s a lot of,
- really lots of really exciting and interesting innovations
- taking place in the FinTech world
- that are also affecting, impacting positively,
- in certain cases negatively the hedge fund industry.
- Definitely an area to watch.
Industry Showcase: How AI is Transforming the Future of FinTech (Microsoft)
- Hi, everyone. This is Delon.
- I’m a Technical Evangelist
- from the Commercial Software Engineering team,
- from Microsoft.
- Today, I’m here to present to you
- how AI technologies
- and big data analytics could integrate
- with your FinTech technologies.
- Smarter computers, algorithms,
- and dedicated AI systems
- enable smarter decision-making,
- deeper learning.
- For example, recognise predictors
- of financial turbulence.
- And the combination of artificial intelligence
- and big data,
- allow us to understand better how people,
- how they spend the money, their health,
- as well as the lifestyle.
- For example, intelligent banking.
- It is all based on the “always on” customer,
- and predicting his or her financial needs
- at a certain point of time.
- Thus, it’s not just about the bank,
- but providing products and services
- through one channel,
- a single interface that can maximise
- your customer experience,
- and hence centricity.
- However, building those trusts from your customers
- is still one of the biggest challenges for FinTech.
- And in Microsoft, we are trying our best
- to gain and build lots and lots of trust
- from our customers.
- And here are a few examples:
- If P&C Insurance is a world-leading
- property and casualty insurance company
- that serves over 3 millions of customers
- in the Nordic region,
- if actually leveraging our Cortana Analytics Suite
- to perform Churn analytics.
- In other words, predicting whether their customers
- will cancel the policy in a 40-day window
- surrounding the renewal dates.
- Another example is that,
- actually they’re doing upsell prediction.
- Basically, finding the probability of success
- of upsell communication to a given customer.
- Last but not least,
- they are applying text analytics algorithms
- on their inbound emails from their customers.
- So, they could now better understand their customers,
- classify those emails,
- and better serve their customers.
- Another example is Novum Bank.
- Novum Bank will like to
- assess the credit-worthiness of their customers.
- Especially in the poor credit information markets.
- With Microsoft, they actually built
- an automated psychographic credit-scoring engine,
- running on Azure, for onboarding.
- In return, the acceptance rate was increased by 18%,
- and they actually rejected
- bad customers.
- Finally, I will like to share with you one more example.
- CallCredit, one of the UK’s largest
- credit reference agencies.
- They’re actually leveraging Azure machine learning
- to identify criminals who pretend people
- to access credit reports, and borrow money.
- With all these machine learning and AI tools,
- CallCredit can now proactively spot people
- who will actually fail to pay back their loans.
- Most importantly, our machine learning model
- could advise their lenders
- on how to make much more accurate decisions.
- So, these are some of the examples how we integrate
- big data analytics, AI technologies,
- with FinTech solutions.
- Hope you get some insights from this session,
- and hope you enjoyed it.
Industry Showcase (NEW): How Will AI Transform Financial Analysis? (MioTech)
- Today, we will be discovering how artificial intelligence
- will transform financial analysis.
- I am Tao,
- I am the co-founder and CTO of MioTech.
- MioTech is a startup that provides intelligence analysis
- for financial institutions.
- Artificial intelligence will dramatically
- change the way financial institutions analyse risk
- and investment opportunities.
- Firstly, thanks to the breakthrough of deep learning,
- multiple basic artificial intelligence algorithms
- have greatly improved,
- including natural language processing,
- image processing, and speech recognition, etc.
- Natural language processing
- is one of the most important topics.
- Nowadays, computers can understand the syntax
- and extract entities more accurately.
- There has also been huge progress
- in relationship extractions and sentiment analysis.
- Let’s take one sentence as an example.
- We can see that the algorithm can understand
- both the syntax and semantics.
- Google and Mountain View are defined
- as an organisation and a city.
- MioTech used our in-house model to extract topics.
- By analysing daily online narratives,
- we can extract different kind of topics,
- like product release, buyback behaviours, etc.
- Also we can analyse the impact
- of each event in real time.
- Image processing has also greatly improved.
- Problems like classification,
- feature extractions, and pattern recognition,
- are reaching to new levels.
- By using this technology,
- we can easily process the satellite image
- and know the progress
- of 5G infrastructure construction.
- MioTech has been using this technology
- to understand the operation
- of harbour and oil rig activities.
- Secondly, with more and more data accumulated,
- analysis based on a small sample
- will change to a full set analysis.
- The most obvious example
- is the development of anti-fraud.
- Currently, there are thousands of people
- in large banks who are responsible
- for checking the legality of transactions.
- Although it is one of the biggest departments in a bank,
- only a small proportion
- of the transactions can be analysed.
- However, AI can learn the way criminals commit fraud
- in a short period of time,
- with all the transactional data,
- and be able to make real-time decisions.
- Humans only need to review the results
- and make a final decision afterwards.
- In the meantime,
- the algorithm can find the new pattern much faster.
- Paypal and Alipay are already using this technology
- to prevent financial fraud.
- To commit financial fraud online
- will only get harder and harder from now on.
- Individuals and companies are
- generating a huge amount of data every day,
- so relying on humans for analysis
- will no longer be feasible
- and the ability to process the data
- will determine how well financial institutions
- can provide their services.
- Take MioTech as one example.
- We are processing over 100 gigabytes of data every day.
- And we maintain a knowledge graph
- of over one billion level entities
- and their relationships.
- Companies are using us
- to predict risk in real time.
- To give one example,
- when Huawei releases a new product,
- we can instantly know their suppliers will be affected.
- And the inventory, it will influence your portfolio.
- For a company like us,
- knowing that more employees will be engaged
- in data collection and data processing
- instead of making rule-based models.
- Although AI is being
- increasingly adopted in real-world contexts,
- there are still many challenges that we need to solve.
- Explaining AI behaviour has often been difficult
- and it is crucial for financial institutions
- and the regulatory authorities.
- Imagine if the algorithm is using a biased attribute
- to make judgement on races or sexuality.
- Humans will need to spend
- a huge amount of time to justify it and solve it.
- At the same time, the security of the AI algorithm
- is still not well resolved.
- If some crucial task is judged by AI,
- then the hacker’s invasion
- is likely to lead to a big financial disaster.
- Data sharing and data security is also a big problem.
- Data is the base for most financial applications.
- However, a large proportion of data
- is processed by international companies
- like Google and Facebook.
- How we can share the data and protect data privacy
- is a big challenge as well.
- It’s just the beginning,
- and I hope you enjoyed the video
- enough to be part of this growing trend.
- Come join us.
Industry Showcase (NEW): AI in Financial Services (Huawei)
- Hello there, my name is Bill Genovese.
- I’m with Huawei.
- I am Vice President of corporate strategy planning
- for banking and financial markets,
- and based out of Shenzhen, China.
- Prior to Huawei, I was with IBM for over a decade
- and before that, with KPMG,
- and I came into both of those companies from banking,
- so I have 25 years of industry
- global experience in this sector.
- So when we talk about artificial intelligence,
- it’s often thrown about
- and tried to be positioned into a corner,
- robotics or natural language processing,
- but it’s really a basket term of technologies
- that are being applied in financial services
- as well as other sectors
- and really, five key buckets; pattern detection,
- so looking for common patterns of reference
- in terms of behaviours, as well as, anti-patterns
- and outliers, foresights, so leveraging that information
- to train artificial intelligence
- to augment humans to make the right decision.
- Customization and personalization,
- very relevant in financial services
- for the customer experience.
- Then, we get into machine learning,
- unsupervised and supervised machine learning.
- So looking for patterns and unsupervised.
- Once those patterns
- and clusters are identified,
- that can be used for supervised machine learning.
- That will become reinforced machine learning
- in terms of recommendations
- and decision engines, and optimizations.
- And that leads to self-learning.
- It also leverages another key requirement,
- especially in financial services,
- is structured and unstructured data.
- For it to work properly
- and in an optimised fashion,
- you need a lot of data. You need big data.
- You need to leverage your investments in big data,
- okay, so that deep learning neural nets can be trained,
- overall machine learning,
- which deep learning neural nets are a subset of,
- and then, you can further develop and
- industries can further develop banks, capital markets,
- insurers, artificial intelligent applications.
- So, in terms of intelligent society
- and financial services, AI with IoT,
- AI with blockchain, AI with IoT and blockchain,
- So these are all inputs into faster digital transformation
- for the banks and the insurers.
- The convergence of those technologies
- to solve the traditional financial service functions
- and problems that need to be digitalized today
- and going forward.
- So it doesn’t exist in a vacuum, okay?
- AI, in terms of traditional financial services,
- is not being explored in isolation in a vacuum either.
- So deposits and lending, okay,
- insurance, payments, investment management,
- capital markets, market infrastructure,
- It’s being applied across the board,
- If you look the three basic things that we need
- as human beings, in terms of a consumption model:
- (1) We need to pay our bills.
- If we don’t have enough money to pay our bills,
- we borrow, and we take out credit and lending.
- And then, (2) if we have excess money
- and aspirationally, we all want and need to do this,
- we have to put money away to save.
- (3) And if we have extra money beyond that, we invest.
- AI is impacting across the board
- all three of those needs as human beings
- and making it easier for us.
- And companies that are providing that linkage,
- so they know where you’re paying your money to.
- They can offer you lending products
- when you need it on demand,
- and if they see you have extra money,
- they’re going to offer you savings accounts,
- cash accounts, or even investment products
- right from your mobile device, all AI-enabled.
- So, AI is moving the industry from silos,
- exclusivity of relationships, high switching costs
- between providers to the human,
- and it’s the value of not replacing your thinking,
- but augmenting you to free you up
- to do what you want to do in your life
- and supporting your decision process.
- So on the provider side, it allows them to cut costs,
- leaner, faster operations, tailored products
- and advice, less product overlapping,
- competing product overlap,
- providing ubiquitous presence in the consumer’s life
- that’s personalised and they can offer
- new business models, new collaborations
- outside their industry vertical,
- a bank with a retailer and new value propositions.
- So, in terms of streamlining processes,
- there’s a number of companies, deposits and lending,
- insurance payments, investment management,
- and from a back-office perspective,
- I would say this is more “digitization” than digitalization
- so taking paper and automating it
- through robotic process automation, onboarding,
- filling in applications for loans and mortgages.
- So, that’s one area where
- FinTech startups are disrupting
- and offering the traditional players
- capabilities to partner with them to do that.
- Another is, really do we want to try to maintain costs?
- but how much can we personalise for our customers?
- So, intelligent chatbots,
- Allstate from the insurance sector,
- is a good good example of this.
- So harnessing the data that they have on you
- and really applying it to your personal experience,
- so you can get through that a lot easier,
- without humans or augmenting humans,
- Expanding, I talked about expanding business models,
- So, Amazon Go is a great example.
- I’ve seen these in China.
- So these are humanless stores, or cashless stores,
- where you essentially go in,
- you pick up the grocery items you want,
- and then, you wave your palm at the device
- and you will walk out,
- and everything is billed to your bank account.
- The most important thing is insights, okay?
- Everything that I’ve kind of described up to this point
- can’t really happen until the industry harnesses
- that treasure trove of information they have on you
- to give you the personalised experience you want,
- Over time, it’s going to allow the industry
- to kind of shape new products,
- shelve some old products that are no longer traditional,
- that are not working anymore.
- But it’s going to right size or right fit the product mix
- and the solutions in the industry
- to fit the lives of the consumer,
- which opens up new revenue opportunities.
- So finally, in conclusion,
- where does this all kind of lead?
- The next step, in terms of the future,
- is more of ambient banking,
- or next generation financial services, as we’re calling it,
- with AI is part of the centre of that, where it’s cash-free,
- anytime, anyplace, anywhere,
- in your 360-degree environment around you.
- And then, I would even go so far to say that
- it will come off the device potentially at some point.
- Okay, and you’re interacting with financial services
- through your glasses, your watch, your ring,
- or projected on a wall that you have control over.
- And that’s really kind of where we see things going.
- So once again, thank you for your time.
- I’ve had a pleasure coming here.
- I hope this was useful, but keep in mind
- that AI is here to stay.
- The industry needs
- and relies upon it to make things easier
- as you consume financial services,
- now and in the future.
Industry Showcase: Ensuring Compliance From the Start: Suitability & Funds (Investment Navigator)
- Over the last few years we have seen
- and experienced a wave of regulations
- in the financial services industry
- all around the world.
- Typically, new regulations strive
- for an increase of investor protection.
- Because of this wave of regulations,
- it is increasingly difficult
- for financial service providers
- to stay compliance
- when conducting investment advice
- whether it is in person or via robo-advisory.
- Having pre- and post-trade checks in place
- is not optional for banks,
- it’s mandatory to stay in business.
- FinTech can help to establish such robust processes
- by replacing error-prone
- and inefficient manual compliance checks
- with automated solution along the investment
- and advisory value chain.
- In our case of investmentnavigator.com,
- technology enables
- the entanglement of client context,
- regulatory rules and product data
- to assess suitability on the individual instrument level.
- By acting upon suitability feedbacks,
- banks can not only significantly reduce regulatory risks
- and save time through the automation,
- but also level up the client experience.
- They get enabled to offer
- the most cost-efficient suitable investment instrument
- for the respective client context.
- A very tangible benefit also for the client.
- Behind the scenes,
- the cloud-based rule engine
- is the technological heart of Investment Navigator,
- which allows us to deliver coherent suitability feedbacks
- into every application along the investment
- and advisory value chain.
- It is therefore strategic for us
- to provide our clients the complete freedom
- to consume our Suitability Service
- via one or several channels.
- We currently maintain customised webpages,
- an API to integrate into proprietary advisory tools
- a core-banking adapter and an Excel add-in.
- To sum-up, as a B2B FinTech company,
- we believe that by pairing technology
- with subject matter intelligence,
- we simplify financial advice.
- That’s how FinTech creates a “win-win” situation
- for financial service providers, as well as, customers.
3.5 Crowdfunding – Rewards, Charity and Equity
- The concept of crowdfunding
- is not as new as many may think.
- The Statue of Liberty was famously known as
- a gift from the French people
- to commemorate the American Revolution.
- What is less known is that there was
- not enough funding for the base of the statue
- and thus was actually crowdfunded by
- Joseph Pulitzer by placing appeals
- in the New York World newspaper in 1885
- seeking contributions.
- The rest, as they say, is history.
- Crowdfunding’s modern incarnation gained popularity
- when Kickstarter launched in 2009
- as an online platform to fund
- creative projects campaigns
- in exchange for rewards.
- Although not its’ initial main target audience,
- Kickstarter became a favourite amongst
- hardware enthusiasts who wanted to
- fund minimum-batch-order production runs
- of electronics in Shenzhen
- and sought other enthusiasts to help with funding
- and receive part of the batch run as rewards.
- Gradually it became used more for pre-marketing
- and product validation of
- prototype consumer electronic, and other products,
- and even incorporated by hardware accelerators
- and venture capitalists.
- Some of the most funded Kickstarter campaigns
- were to fund smartwatch Pebble,
- the Connected Coolest Cooler,
- a Baubax, the travel jacket
- made for electronic accessories.
- Crowdfunding has been used
- to benefit charities as well.
- With sites like gofundme
- having raised three billion U.S. Dollars
- from over 25 million donors
- across two million campaigns.
- In China, Tencent’s ’99 Charity Day’ in 2017
- raised approximately 930 Million Yuan
- or 126 Million U.S. Dollars from
- over 12 million Wechat users
- for charities running 6700 programmes
- over a three-day period.
- Many other crowdfunding platforms
- have since emerged with different levels of curation.
- For example, IndieGoGo does not have
- a minimum all-or-nothing funding goal,
- and does not require a working prototype.
- More specialised platforms around sectors
- or themes have also emerged.
- Yet, before too long,
- some backers began to question
- this rewards approach.
- In late 2012 Oculus Rift’s 19 year-old founder
- raised 2.4 million U.S. Dollars
- offering it’s virtual reality
- head-mounted display as rewards.
- Yet, less than two years later,
- he sold the company to Facebook for two billion dollars.
- Were rewards backers chumps?
- If they could have received substantial upside
- by receiving equity in Oculus Rift,
- rather than V.R. Headgear?
- In 2012 Congress passed the JOBS Act
- which amongst other things legitimised
- the concept of equity crowdfunding.
- And in 2015, the SEC passed the Title IV regulations.
- Many other countries around the world followed suit
- to pass crowdfunding laws to encourage innovation,
- and to allow direct retail investment into
- early stage companies to augment current reliance
- on private placement exemptions from
- professional investors like venture capital firms,
- and high-net-worth individuals.
- The World Bank has predicted that
- crowdfunding investments will be
- a US$96 billion a year market
- in developing countries alone by 2025.
- And Goldman Sachs’ analysts have heralded
- crowdfunding as potentially the most disruptive
- of all the new models of finance.
- In essence, online capital marketplaces
- have three main facets.
- First, digital access by the general public
- to learn more about,
- and for the information to be posted by projects online.
- Second, easy to use and secure fund flow
- from the general public to support these projects.
- And third, marketplaces where there is
- sufficiency of information for decisions to be made
- about the project and its’ promoters that
- enable matchmaking of projects
- to the potential supporters.
- So unlike traditional stock markets which
- relied upon brokers and dealers as intermediaries,
- individual investors could transact directly
- which lead to many to describe this as
- disintermediation and democratisation of finance.
- Entrepreneurship and SMEs are well recognised as
- important drivers of employment and innovation.
- And television shows like Shark Tank in the U.S.
- And Dragon’s Den in the U.K. popularised
- and encouraged the notion of entrepreneurs
- seeking such early stage funding for their projects
- and the general public’s willingness and ability
- to participate in these kinds of investment decisions
- from their living room chairs.
- If securities in the form of equities
- or investment products are being offered
- existing securities
- and collective investment scheme laws and regulations
- require perspectives to be prepared for
- public offers unless they are private placements
- made to sophisticated investors.
- Crowdfunding legislation introduced specifically
- recognised such limitations of existing laws
- and are designed to allow SMEs and entrepreneurs
- to be able to more cost-effectively tap
- funding from the general public
- with specific consumer protection elements built in.
- Examples of these elements include
- limiting the size of qualified companies,
- capping investor, investment amounts,
- and requiring investor cooling-off periods.
- Minimum disclosure and lockups
- as well as licensing the marketplace portals.
- Yet, equity was just the first financial instrument
- to utilise this new distributed
- peer-to-peer model of finance.
- More was to come.
3.6 P2P and Marketplace Lending
- Crowdfunding for debt emerged
- almost in parallel with crowdfunding in equity.
- Known as peer-to-peer lending or P2P lending
- or crowdlending, the size of this market
- was perceived to be even bigger,
- as it encompasses not just unsecured business
- and SME loans but the personal finance sector.
- In the aftermath of the global financial crisis,
- many governments became very supportive
- of this form of alternative finance
- after the loss of trust in traditional banks.
- The basic concept is simple.
- In a low-interest-rate environment,
- many individual savers
- sought alternative avenues for investment
- at a time when banks had reduced their lending.
- Through an online platform,
- borrowers are listed to be matched by lenders
- who benefit from a higher return
- due to the lower overhead costs.
- It seems like a win-win situation
- for borrower and lender.
- The concept can be traced back to Kiva,
- a micro-lending platform inspired
- by microfinance founder Muhammad Yunus,
- which allowed loans to be made to individuals
- in rural communities within developing countries.
- For example, you can help a farmer in Africa
- by lending him money to buy a particular cow.
- In the United Kingdom,
- platforms such as Zopa
- and Funding Circle expanded P2P lending rapidly.
- In the United States,
- companies like Prosper
- and LendingClub grew exponentially,
- with the latter being the first
- P2P lending company to IPO in 2014.
- Credit analysis is critical in this sector
- of unsecured loans
- which do not enjoy government guarantees.
- How do you know the individuals
- or businesses will repay the loan?
- To address the risks, loans often have
- short tenors, and some platforms
- introduced secured loans and trust accounts.
- There was also a regulatory lacuna as loans
- are not on their face securities.
- This was a situation that changed
- in the United States in 2008
- when the SEC extended jurisdiction
- over such P2P-lending platforms.
- Two trends began emerging.
- First, many categories of loans emerged
- on specialised platforms,
- from consumer lending to business lending,
- real-estate lending, student loans
- and payday loans linked to wages paid.
- Second, individual lenders started getting dwarfed
- by institutional lenders and investors,
- so that instead of being called peer-to-peer lending,
- the sector became known as marketplace lending.
- In the meantime, the combination
- of a lighter regulatory touch,
- rising middle class
- and the lack of investment alternatives
- led the P2P-lending market in China to explode.
- It was primarily when CreditEase listed
- its Yirendai unit in 2015 that the West realised
- the size of loans originated
- and the number of borrowers in China dwarfed that
- of the largest US platform lenders.
- However, problems emerged in this area
- of China’s shadow banking,
- and the 2016 Blue Book of Internet Finance found
- 1,263 namely 1/3 of China’s P2P platforms problematic.
- For example, in 2017, a Chinese court concluded
- that P2P-lender Ezubo defrauded
- more than 900,000 investors of 50 billion yuan,
- or US $7.6 billion, under a Ponzi scheme,
- and two of its founders were
- sentenced to life imprisonment
- and 24 executives were jailed for three to 15 years.
- China’s regulators have since been tightening
- P2P-lending rules,
- such as requiring custodian banks to be appointed,
- imposing borrowing and interest caps, and recently
- preventing microfinance lending companies and banks
- from respectively raising and funding P2P loans.
- The new generation of P2P-lending companies
- appear to be veering away as lending platforms
- to become innovative credit analysis services
- that incorporate analysis of social media usage
- and online purchase patterns that can be used
- by traditional banks and bank syndicates.
- Similarly, P2P insurance has evolved
- and has been described as evolving from
- a distribution model to a carrier model
- and now a self-governing model.
- The evolution of P2P lending
- provides useful lessons
- for the development of the current darling of
- distributed peer-to-peer models of finance,
- namely, cryptocurrencies and token sales.
3.7 The Rise of Chinese TechFins
- In December 2016, Alibaba’s founder Jack Ma,
- coined the phrase “TechFin”,
- “FinTech takes the original financial system
- and improves its technology”,
- Ma Yun told South China Morning Post’s
- China Conference in Hong Kong.
- “TechFin is to rebuild the system with technology.”
- Another way to think about it is that
- where financial institutions
- and FinTech startups seek to improve
- or upend the existing financial system in FinTech,
- tech companies approach this issue
- from a different and more consumer and
- technology centric perspective in TechFin.
- It is instructive to compare the rise of
- American tech giants to those from China,
- to better understand their difference
- in origins and approaches.
- China’s tech giants are commonly known as
- the BATs: Baidu, Alibaba and Tencent.
- In the United States, a commonly known acronym
- is the GAFAs: Google, Apple, Facebook and Amazon.
- During the dotcom boom and web 2.0,
- today’s Silicon Valley tech giants grew
- mainly using advertising or “eyeball” models
- that relied on generating more viewers.
- Examples of these include
- search engines like Google
- and social media portals like Facebook.
- Apple was then primarily a hardware manufacturer,
- and e-commerce pioneers like
- marketplace platform eBay,
- which acquired PayPal in 2002
- to power it’s transactions,
- and online bookseller Amazon booked the majority
- of its transactions via credit cards.
- In contrast, in China
- where credit card penetration remained low,
- the tech giants incorporated transactions
- into their platforms from the very beginning.
- Hangzhou based Alibaba started as
- a business-to-business or B2B platform,
- and when it transitioned more
- to a business-to-consumer or B2C platform,
- with the introduction of online retailer Taobao,
- it extended its sister company’s payment system,
- now known as Alipay, to consumer transactions.
- Instead of Amazon’s money-back guarantee,
- Alibaba provides comfort to its retail consumers
- by keeping payments of goods in a deposit account
- that is not released until receipt
- and approval of the goods by the customer.
- Yu’eBao or “leftover treasure” was born
- when Alibaba started offering interest
- to customers who kept their funds in this account
- at rates higher than bank deposits.
- The Wall Street Journal reported that in just four years,
- Yu’eBao had accrued 370 million account holders
- and 211 billion dollars in US assets
- to be twice the size of the next largest
- money market fund JP Morgan Asset Management.
- Shenzhen-based online gaming company Tencent
- built in micropayments early because
- its freemium business model was based on
- gamers making in-game payments for
- its free-to-play games,
- to buy say, awesome virtual swords.
- When the company transitioned into mobile
- and introduced instant messaging
- through QQ for youth and then WeChat,
- they captured an amazing userbase
- of nearly one billion active users
- who learned to transact online through inventions
- like hongbao where users can give
- and receive traditional red packets for mere cents.
- WeChat now also allows users to use
- and transact via third party mini-apps,
- including financial ones,
- without even exiting the instant messaging ecosystem
- to open new apps.
- In 2015, Tencent launched WeBank,
- China’s first online only bank,
- using sophisticated credit analysis
- based on WeChat social media usage
- and online purchase patterns,
- that is also offered to service traditional lenders.
- Quick Response codes, or QR codes,
- are also rapidly changing China into a cashless society.
- Being built into WeChat and many other apps,
- China’s smartphone users can use scannable codes
- to facilitate offline-to-online,
- or O2O transactions, connect with others
- to replace the venerable business card,
- as well as to make payments.
- Financial supermarkets are also proliferating.
- For example, Alibaba’s Zhao Cai Bao
- offers fixed term deposit products
- from third-party financial institutions or individuals,
- mutual funds, and stock market information.
- These compare with distribution platforms
- traditionally accessible only to
- to institutional fund managers
- and to existing retail sales distributions
- via banks or retail fund managers.
- In the meantime, in the West,
- the GAFAs are not sitting idly by.
- Facebook’s messaging app WhatsApp
- is incorporating a lot of
- WeChat’s innovative features.
- Apple has since developed a tremendous
- and very sticky online ecosystem
- with App Store and iTunes.
- And Amazon’s Prime has paved the way
- for subscription based models,
- for content such as its competitor Netflix,
- to show that users are willing to pay
- for quality movie, television and music content.
- Most importantly, they are also investing heavily
- in the next generation
- of ABCD technologies and infrastructure, namely,
- artificial intelligence, blockchain, cloud, and data.
- How long will it be before GAFA are inspired
- by their Chinese BATs counterparts to use
- their digital nous, consumer-centric mindsets
- and broad user-base clout to directly
- participate and compete in finance?
- Tech giants have brands that are trusted
- especially amongst younger financial consumers
- at a time when banks have lost trust
- after the global financial crisis.
- Yet, traditional finance and banks are used to
- working within highly regulated environments
- that many tech companies have not yet
- fully come to grips with.
- The Silicon Valley ethos that
- “it is easier to ask for forgiveness
- than to seek permission”
- works just fine in the internet industry,
- where lines of code can be corrected
- and changed overnight on a website.
- It works less well
- in a highly regulated industry like finance.
Additional Video Resources: Chinese TechFin
1. What is Alipay? (2.30 Mins)
3.8 ICOs
- Well, let’s talk now about a very exciting topic of ICOs.
- ICOs, ICOs, ICOs, you’ve probably heard this term a lot
- in the media or from friends.
- Well, there was actually a lot of buzz in the media
- in recent months about this topic.
- Believe it or not, only in 2017,
- more than $6 billion were raised by ICOs.
- But what is an ICO?
- An ICO is short for Initial Coin Offering,
- often referred to as a token sale.
- It’s a limited period of time in which
- a company sells a predefined number of
- digital tokens to the public.
- But what is this really?
- You know to really simplify things
- a good analogy is, well if we make a comparison
- to what happens in real life?
- Let’s take a private club,
- let’s say tomorrow I want to build a private club
- and I come to you and I say,
- hey, I want to build a private club.
- Here’s where the swimming pool’s going to be,
- this is where the restaurant is going to be
- and these are where the tennis courts are going to be
- and it’s going to be the best private club in the world.
- But in order to enjoy the facilities,
- you need to be a member.
- If you want to…
- you have to be a member to be able
- to enjoy the facilities.
- Yes, you still need to pay for your breakfast,
- or when you’re at the tennis club,
- but to join the club, you need to be a member.
- And that is really if we really generalise what ICOs are.
- They are selling these memberships
- to this ecosystem that people can use.
- But you would say,
- why is somebody doing this?
- Why wouldn’t they simply issue shares
- in the company for capital?
- Well, there’s a couple differences.
- In most ICOs, the tokens that you’re issuing
- have no economic rights, no voting rights
- and they’re generally outside the scope
- or the traditional regulatory framework.
- This is different from when you issues shares
- in exchange of equity for your business
- where you often get a calmer exposure
- to your business,
- you have voting rights
- and there’s a pretty well clear and established path
- of how you can raise money in that way.
- And this is actually a very interesting way
- of actually generating value where people
- are trying to build their ecosystems
- and actually doing ICOs for doing so.
- But why do you think
- a lot of entrepreneurs are doing this?
- But one of the big advantage of an ICO
- is it doesn’t dilute you.
- When I’m issuing shares for capital
- I actually kind of giving away
- part of my business to my investors.
- The beauty of an ICO is actually you’re issuing
- these tokens that allow these purchasers
- of these tokens to access the ecosystem,
- but without really diluting your equity.
- And this has been pretty big game-changer
- because many believe this actually can enable us
- to actually democratise capital in fund raising.
- In a traditional world if you’re launching a business
- you hope you have some friends or contacts
- who have money who are happy
- to invest in your business.
- The beauty of an ICO allows individuals
- from all around the world to raise money
- if they have a good idea and a good project.
- Whether you’re in Santiago, Chile,
- Moscow, Russia,
- Johannesburg, South Africa,
- or Hong Kong, China,
- doesn’t really matter.
- The world is actually where you can go raise money.
- Obviously there’s a lot of regulatory requirements
- and restrictions, but I think you get my point.
- And what’s been really interesting
- is over the last 12 to 18 months
- since the beginning of the ICO craze,
- we have really seen the industry turn swarming off.
- Initially it was a lot of young entrepreneurs
- who had an idea, wrote a white paper,
- and were able to raise quite a bit of money.
- What we have seen since then is the industry
- becoming definitely more institutional.
- We have seen the emergence of best practises
- like in the space of KYC and the AML
- Know Your Client and Anti Money Laundering.
- We have seen the emergence of best practises
- when it comes to the government and transparency.
- For example how these ICO companies are being run.
- What is a transparency that has been given
- to people who own these tokens?
- So really there’s a lot of exciting space
- going on in this space.
- There will be definitely more
- regulatory enforcement cases moving forward.
- Tax authorities will look at it.
- And actually the regulatory space,
- this entire space may become
- more regulated as well.
- But this is definitely an area to watch
- if you’re interested in the broader startup,
- blockchain and cryptospace.
Industry Showcase (NEW) – Collaborative and Contextual Banking (WeBank)
- Hello, today I’ll be talking about
- how finance is becoming far more intuitive
- and customer-oriented, but just as importantly,
- how technology is informing new types
- of financial business models and services.
- Finance is becoming contextualised,
- brought into the business scenarios where it is needed
- and it is being provided by both traditional
- and non-traditional players collaborating together.
- My name is Tyler Aveni and I serve as
- the Head of International Partnerships for WeBank.
- WeBank is the Tencent-affiliated digital bank
- based in Shenzhen, China.
- We are the first privately-owned bank
- as well as, the first internet bank here in China as well.
- This is to say that
- since receiving our banking licence in 2014,
- we have never opened a physical bank branch
- to serve our customers.
- Instead, we leverage on an intelligent technology stack,
- digital channels, and a host of
- different business partners and their resources,
- to offer retail banking solutions.
- These are both business-to-consumer products,
- like savings accounts and credit to individuals,
- as well as, white-labeled products
- and other technological solutions
- we offer to institutions.
- Our most popular product, called Weilidai,
- is a micro-credit product which we offer exclusively
- through the texting and social media platforms
- WeChat and QQ to Chinese users.
- In the case of credit,
- we are using our technology to understand
- the behavioural and financial interactions of users
- to reduce fraud and build a more complete picture
- of someone’s credit worthiness.
- This helps improve access to financial services
- for underbanked customers
- who may not have conventional credit bureau data.
- On the funding side, we can do this
- through a loan syndication model
- wherein dozens of bank partners contribute
- the majority of funding for each micro loan
- using new methods like blockchain technology.
- And what this equates to, essentially,
- is this complex array of collaborating institutions
- in cutting-edge technology, operating behind the scenes,
- all so that we can effectively provide
- this extremely easy to understand
- and accessible product.
- And so too, around the world,
- we see that technology
- is the driving factor behind the changes
- we are seeing in banking and finance.
- It then holds that financial institutions need to learn
- from their large IT counterparts and their development.
- More than just bolstering in-house core competency
- in some of these new technologies though,
- this really also means embracing
- an ideology of collaboration,
- the same kind of collaboration we have seen
- in open-source software projects
- and how they have brought long-term benefits
- to IT industry leaders and their users alike.
- Banks, as a full-service model,
- are very sticky institutions by design.
- You, as a customer of the bank,
- face a lot of obstacles in changing providers,
- and may even lack information
- to know on what grounds
- to make that selection to begin with.
- This is quickly changing,
- and giving way to several new models of banking
- which are much more collaboration focused.
- The first model simply reduces banks
- to a risk management function
- and provides security of your money
- as a kind of public utility.
- This may be used in the case of retail businesses
- that decides to offer financial services
- and open accounts for customers.
- Behind the scenes, any funds that might be held
- would be protected and managed by a partner bank
- in exchange for a fee.
- The second, is a type of marketplace banking.
- With the advent of Open Banking frameworks
- such as what is being rolled out in the UK now,
- or the Second Payment Services Directive
- or PSD2 across Europe,
- users are gaining more explicit control
- over their digital information,
- meaning customers can more easily transfer their data
- from one institution to another.
- This data can be standardised
- and offered as functionality
- in the form of tools like APIs and SDKs.
- So in marketplace banking,
- the banks still remained a single channel for banking,
- but many other FinTechs and financial institutions
- can offer their particular financial product,
- whether it be a loan, a payment tool,
- a rewards mechanism and so on,
- through this channel or marketplace.
- This allows users to compare and then easily
- swap in-and-out comparable services,
- all linked to their bank account
- in a Lego building like manner.
- And then, third, in contextual banking,
- you have financial products
- that are still being designed,
- managed, and provided by a bank
- or another financial institution.
- However, they are being provided
- in the business scenario that they are required.
- For instance, we see this when we are offered a credit
- or loan product during an online purchase.
- In this sense, finance is seen as an enabler
- of the transactions within our lives.
- Making a trip to a bank,
- or in the digital equivalent, moving to another app,
- is not an activity that really offers the user
- some inherent benefit necessarily.
- And so, this poses a direct challenge
- to a long-held belief in banking,
- that banks’ strongest asset
- is its relationship to customers.
- Wherein marketplace banking sees
- an unbundling of the full-service bank,
- to allow FinTechs to specialise in specific products
- or financial services and plug-in to the platform,
- contextual banking sees a separation of value
- along different lines.
- Digital services, businesses that are a part
- of the shared economy, e-commerce and so on,
- these companies provide access to data,
- understanding of their customer,
- and massive distribution.
- By embedding the financial products into these
- business scenarios with some of the additional data,
- banks and supporting technology intermediaries
- can create unique products that are tailored
- to the specific situation.
- In fact, at WeBank, our mobile application,
- a combination of a savings account
- and wealth management products,
- remains the only direct channel for servicing customers.
- All of our other products, including the Weilidai,
- the micro-credit product mentioned earlier,
- are offered through partner platforms.
- And so, it is not just BigTechs and FinTechs
- that become part of the future financial landscape,
- but in fact, most businesses will
- increasingly become participatory
- in some of these business models
- because finance is a big part of our lives.
Additional Resource Insights
A. References and Suggestions for Further Reading
- IOSCO Research Report on Financial Technologies (FinTech) (Industry Report – IOSCO)
- Understanding Alternative Finance: The UK Alternative Finance Industry Report 2014 (Industry Report – Nesta)
- The ICO Gold Rush: It’s a Scam, It’s a Bubble, It’s a Super Challenge for Regulators (Academic Paper: Zetzsche, Buckley, Arner, Fohr)
- Regulation of Digital Financial Services in China: Last Mover Advantage (Academic paper: Zhou, Arner, Buckley)
B. Additional Resource Insights for Module 3.4.1: How AI is Transforming the Future of FinTech
- Microsoft Professional Program in AI – From an Introduction to AI to Mastery of Skills Needed to Build Deep Learning Models for AI Solutions
Mid-Point Message from Course Director Douglas Arner
- Hello, and welcome to the mid-point
- of Introduction to FinTech.
- We very much hope that you’ve enjoyed
- our first three modules so far.
- Looking back, in our first module,
- we looked at what is FinTech?
- And since that module came out
- the World Bank has released the 2018 Global Findex
- which highlights how over a billion people
- over the past six years
- have opened new bank accounts,
- much of this as a result of FinTech.
- In module 2, we looked at payment,
- cryptocurrencies and blockchain
- and over the past six months
- the idea of cryptocurrencies of blockchain
- has continued to dominate
- the news media about finance.
- Countries such as Venezuela
- have launched the first sovereign cryptocurrencies
- and others, including China, Russia
- and a range of others
- are considering similar proud programmes.
- In module 3, we looked at the digitization of finance
- and at alternative finance.
- In the context of digitization of finance,
- we’re seeing an increasing presence of AI, the launch of
- an increasing number of Independent funds
- which choose their own investments via AI
- and run themselves.
- In the context of alternative finance,
- the use of blockchain and crowdfunding,
- the idea behind ICOs continues to grow and grow
- but with evermore regulatory attention.
- So far, over 50 regulators around the world
- have made warnings and announcements about ICOs
- but at the same time,
- even though there are dangers
- there are huge opportunities
- for funding new ideas and early-stage companies.
- Looking into the second half of the course,
- we’re going to move into issues of regulation
- but also one of the most exciting areas
- of opportunity in FinTech
- and that is the entire RegTech ecosystem in module 4.
- In module 5, we’ll turn to
- some of the biggest challenges,
- some of the challenges very much highlighted
- by recent issues with data companies
- such as Facebook, Equifax and others.
- The question of data, monetization of data,
- cybersecurity and TechFins
- and finally, in module 6,
- we’ll look at a number of specific case studies
- using these to pull together
- the things that we’ve learned
- over the previous five modules and look forward a bit
- to see what the future of FinTech may hold.
- For those of you
- who haven’t quite finished module three yet,
- we encourage you to please continue
- going with the course.
- After all, you have plenty of time
- and can do this at your own pace
- but once you’ve started it,
- you might as well keep going because the more you do,
- the more you learn
- and the more you’re likely to understand
- this world of financial technology around us.
- And for those of you who still haven’t quite started,
- now is the best time.
Module 4 FinTech Regulation and RegTech
Welcome to Module 4
4.1 Module 4 Introduction
- In Module 4, we turn to regulation of FinTech,
- and a new development,
- what is called RegTech or regulatory technology,
- and if we look at this module,
- we’re going to begin by looking at
- why do we regulate financial markets
- before turning to the particular challenges
- of regulating FinTech.
- From there we’ll move on
- to what we think is one of the most exciting areas
- of interaction between finance technology
- and regulation, and that is RegTech.
- We’ll look at the RegTech ecosystem
- and also ideas of smart regulation
- and the outlook for future design of financial systems.
Module 4 Learning Objectives
Module 4 addresses the range of regulatory considerations and approaches in the context of FinTech. It highlights the core regulatory objectives and the relationship between the post-2008 financial regulatory reform process and FinTech. It focuses in particular on the concept of RegTech – “regulatory technology” – and the RegTech ecosystem comprising financial institutions, startups, and regulators, and introduces “Smart Regulation” as the redesigning financial infrastructure and regulatory systems on the basis of new technologies, including Big Data, cloud, AI and blockchain.
In Module 4, learners will:
- Understand major financial policy and regulatory objectives and their implications for FinTech.
- Explore RegTech and the RegTech ecosystem, in order to understand one of the key trends in financial and regulatory transformation.
- Consider how regulatory systems and financial infrastructure could be redesigned on the basis of new technologies to deliver better results both from the standpoint of efficiency as well as resilience
- Think about new regulatory approaches such as regulatory sandboxes, India Stack and Smart Regulation.
4.2A FinTech Regulation (Part 1)
- The first question is really
- why do we regulate financial markets in the first place?
- In fact,
- even why do we regulate financial markets at all?
- And as we’ve seen
- with fintech’s evolution generally,
- the 2008 global financial crisis
- was a game changer
- for financial regulation.
- Prior to the 2008 global financial crisis,
- there was a general consensus
- in favour of largely market-based approaches
- to financial market regulation.
- Many of these derived from
- the ideas of what is called
- the efficient markets hypothesis.
- The idea of the efficient markets hypothesis
- is that markets will price in
- all available information
- with prices of financial assets
- providing for efficient allocation
- of financial resources.
- The idea is that market mechanisms provided
- there is sufficient information
- available to markets
- will function to
- both price, financial assets,
- as well as, allocate financial resources
- to their most valuable uses.
- That idea was based on
- a number of assumptions.
- First, that there is
- perfect information available in markets,
- second, that there are
- no transaction costs in markets
- third, that there is
- perfect competition in markets,
- and fourth, that there were
- rational market participants.
- All of these ideas together
- would lead towards
- efficiently functioning financial markets
- which would properly
- support the functioning
- of the overall economy.
- The problem was that
- certainly even prior to 2008,
- we already knew that
- information was not perfect,
- that there are transaction costs
- in acquiring information
- or enforcing transactions in markets,
- and that competition
- is by no means perfect.
- And much of law and regulation
- prior to the global financial crisis
- focused on improving information quality,
- on enhancing competition,
- on reducing transaction costs
- to reduce what are called market failures.
- The idea is that law and regulation
- would be used
- to reduce problems in markets
- to help those markets
- function in a better way.
- 2008 global financial crisis
- fundamentally changed the way
- that we think about
- finance and its regulation.
- In particular, the 2008 global crisis
- and the hundreds of billions of dollars spent
- on bailing out large banks around the world
- highlighted a problem
- which is called systemic risk.
- Systemic risk is the risk that
- the collapse of an individual financial institution
- will cause the collapse of
- the entire financial system,
- which will in turn
- cause the collapse of the economy.
- This is exactly what we saw in 1929
- and the 1930s Great Depression.
- It’s also what we saw in 2008.
- As a result, since 2008,
- there has been a massive amount of attention
- on building new regulatory frameworks
- to prevent financial crises,
- to build confidence,
- and to make markets function properly.
- So, if we think of regulation today,
- its function continues to be
- on improving market functioning and efficiency.
- It is also about
- preventing systemic risks,
- maintaining financial stability,
- and importantly,
- as we’ve already seen,
- it is about fairness
- to market participants.
4.2B FinTech Regulation (Part 2)
- As we just discussed,
- the 2008 financial crisis was a game changer
- in the way that we look at
- regulation of financial markets.
- And for the eight or so years after 2008,
- policy makers globally,
- as well as, regulators around the world
- spent much of their time and efforts
- on developing new regulatory systems
- to prevent the sorts of crisis
- that we saw in 2008,
- but this 2008 crisis
- also triggered an explosion
- in the development of fintech.
- And that explosion
- in the development of fintech
- has been a major challenge for regulators,
- after all, one element of fintech
- is the idea of
- disrupting traditional institutions,
- traditional industries,
- traditional finance,
- but a major object of financial regulation
- after the 2008 crisis
- has been preventing disruption
- in financial markets,
- financial institutions,
- and the financial system.
- The same time,
- there has been a strong focus on regulation
- to support innovation and development
- in the financial system,
- and so regulators have been forced to
- come to terms with the explosion
- in new technologies and new participants
- in the financial sector,
- and to come to grips with
- how to regulate the opportunities
- as well as, the challenges.
- And so far what we have seen
- are four major approaches
- amongst regulators.
- The first approach has largely been
- one of doing nothing,
- in many ways,
- this idea of doing nothing
- can be seen as
- either a positive or a negative approach.
- It can be either permissive or restrictive.
- China, prior to the middle of 2015
- is usually seen as the major example
- of a country taking a permissive approach
- through deciding
- not to put in place new regulations.
- And in many ways,
- it was this decision,
- which has allowed the explosion of fintech
- in the context of China.
- But, as we’ve seen before,
- that explosion of fintech in China
- also brought with it new risks.
- The evolution from
- too small to care to too big to fail,
- that we’ve seen
- in the context of payments,
- money market,
- mutual funds,
- and other areas.
- As a result, even in the context of China,
- the decision over the past several years
- since 2015 has been increasingly to build
- a new regulatory framework
- for digital financial services.
- Other jurisdictions
- have taken an approach
- of not doing anything,
- which has largely been restrictive,
- requiring new entrants into financial services
- with new business models,
- new technologies,
- and new approaches
- to comply with existing regulatory requirements,
- which would typically develop
- for a very different type of
- established financial institution,
- banks,
- insurance companies,
- mutual funds,
- and the like.
- The end result of this is
- often a very restrictive approach.
- Coming into the past several years,
- regulators have been trying
- to balance the objectives
- of innovation and growth
- with considerations of financial stability
- and consumer protection,
- and as a result,
- they are developing an increasing number
- of experimentation-based approaches.
- Some involve regulators
- establishing contact points
- to meet with new entrants,
- to learn about technologies
- in order to be able to
- develop appropriate regulatory responses.
- Others have developed
- what are called sandboxes,
- these are areas for experimentation
- in a limited market context
- with limited regulation,
- in order for both the new company
- as well as the regulator,
- to learn how best to move forward.
- And finally,
- an increasing number of jurisdictions
- developing new regulatory frameworks,
- particularly for the sorts of things
- that we’ve seen in Modules 2 and 3.
- Things like P2P lending or
- alternative payment systems
- or forms of crowdfunding.
- But jurisdictions like China, India and others
- are also looking at
- developing entirely new regulatory approaches.
4.3 Evolution of RegTech
- The 2008 financial crisis
- was one of the key triggers
- for the massive acceleration
- in the development of FinTech worldwide.
- But in addition,
- it was the catalyst for the development of
- RegTech, or regulatory technology.
- And the ideas of RegTech relate to FinTech
- but are much more broader.
- In other words,
- RegTech is the idea of using technology
- for regulatory compliance,
- regulatory monitoring,
- but also, regulatory design.
- It is the idea of using technology
- to make financial markets
- and their regulation more effective.
- Now, if we think of RegTech in that way,
- the key aspect is that
- it is beyond FinTech.
- RegTech can apply
- in any segment of the economy,
- not just in the context of financial regulation.
- One can imagine
- the application of technology
- to environmental regulation,
- or traffic regulation,
- or airline regulation.
- Any area of the economy with regulation,
- the application of technology
- offers the potential
- to transform the effectiveness
- of that particular regulatory system.
- However, in the context of finance,
- RegTech is so far,
- the most developed.
- In particular, we see RegTech
- across traditional financial institutions,
- across new startups,
- and also across regulators, themselves.
- And the global financial crisis
- really made this a necessity.
- Since 2008,
- we have seen an absolute explosion
- in new regulations around the world.
- New regulations are released
- by a major jurisdiction
- approximately once every hour.
- The end result is that,
- every year,
- thousands of new regulations come out.
- And, for a financial institution
- doing business on a cross-boarder basis,
- this is one of the most complex influences
- on their operations
- as well as on their profitability
- because, not only is regulation a challenge,
- but it is also a cost.
- As a result,
- the global financial crisis
- and its explosion of regulation
- has driven the established financial industry
- into applying technology
- to address their compliance burdens
- and their compliance costs.
- At the same time,
- we have seen an explosion
- in new startups, new firms,
- which are offering technologies
- to help both startups
- as well as traditional financial institutions
- and even regulators
- to better address
- their regulatory and compliance burdens.
- Finally, regulators themselves
- are increasingly using technology
- for a range of purposes
- not only to do a better job
- in their regulatory functions,
- but also to increase market efficiencies
- and reduce cost in the industry.
4.4 RegTech Eco-system: Financial Institutions
- The RegTech ecosystem encompasses
- both industry and regulators.
- It encompasses
- the traditional incumbent financial institutions
- like banks,
- insurance companies,
- and investment banks.
- It also encompasses startups
- of an increasing range
- and it also encompasses regulators.
- However, most of the development
- that we’ve seen in the area
- of RegTech over the past decade
- following the global financial crisis
- has been focused
- in the traditional financial services industry,
- in particular, in the banking industry.
- And we can see this obviously simply
- from the cost of regulation.
- Not only have we had thousands of
- new regulations in the US,
- in Europe,
- in Hong Kong,
- in Singapore,
- and Australia,
- in economies all over the world
- as a result of the global financial crisis.
- But large financial institutions around the world
- have paid to date over $300 billion US dollars
- in fines for regulatory failures
- both resulting from and also in the aftermath
- of the global financial crisis.
- Compliance has become a major challenge
- from the standpoint of the industry
- both from the standpoint of
- simply keeping up with regulatory changes
- and their implications,
- but also from the standpoint of
- the very, very large fines
- that we have seen
- coming out of major regulators
- since the global financial crisis.
- And if we look today at
- traditional financial institutions,
- if we look at RegTech in banks,
- probably two areas highlight best
- the necessity of technology.
- First, are what are called
- know your customer requirements.
- Know your customer requirements
- are something that every financial institution
- everywhere in the world must comply with.
- The origin of
- know your customer requirements
- comes from a series of regulations
- that focus on preventing criminal use
- of the financial system,
- in particular,
- things such a money laundering
- or the financing of terrorism.
- Internationally, we have an organisation
- which is called the FATF.
- The FATF is the Financial Action Task Force
- on Money Laundering
- and it establishes
- internationally agreed minimum standards
- for regulation in financial systems
- with which every financial institution
- around the world must comply.
- Now, the challenge is that
- these are simply agreements.
- They then have to be implemented
- into the individual regulatory systems
- of jurisdictions of countries around the world.
- The end result is that the AML,
- Anti-Money Laundering requirements,
- the KYC, Know Your Customer requirements
- in the United States,
- or Europe,
- or Singapore,
- or Hong Kong,
- or Japan,
- Mainland China
- are all very similar but not identical.
- Now, if you are a large financial institution
- which is doing business
- across these major economies,
- part of your regulatory requirements
- are to comply with the requirements
- for KYC and AML
- in each jurisdiction in which you operate.
- And the number of regulators,
- particularly those in the United States
- have put in place some very large fines,
- multiple billions of US dollars
- against large financial institutions
- like HSBC,
- Standard Chartered,
- BNP Paribas
- for failures to
- properly have global systems
- to know their customers
- and prevent money laundering.
- As a result,
- financial institutions have had to
- implement systems
- whereby they can at a moment’s notice
- know who all of their,
- in many cases,
- tens of millions of customers all over the world are,
- and where they’ve gotten their money,
- and whether they raise any risks
- of criminal use of the financial system
- or terrorist financing.
- And the only way
- the financial institutions
- have been able to do this
- is spending large amounts of money
- on employing people
- and building technological systems
- to standardise account opening processes
- and the various reporting requirements
- that money laundering
- and KYC regulations
- around the world apply.
- Another area that we’ll see
- is what is called MiFID II.
- MiFID II is the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive
- in the European Union.
- And MiFID II requires transparency.
- It requires disclosure of
- massive amounts of information
- in particular about financial institutions,
- securities and derivatives trading activities.
- A very good example,
- Merrill Lynch in 2017 was fined
- almost 45 million British pounds
- for failing to report
- almost 75 million transactions
- over a two year period.
- Now, that is
- roughly 150,000 transactions a day
- for every business day
- over that two year period.
- And the only way that
- a financial institution
- can possibly keep track of
- that amount of trading activity is through
- building automated compliance systems
- to package and report
- the information to regulators.
- So, from the standpoint of regulators,
- the incumbent financial industry,
- particularly banks have so far been
- a major driving force.
4.5 RegTech Eco-system: Start-ups
- Predicted to be one of the fastest growing sector
- of 2018, the RegTech startup ecosystem
- has grown rapidly to match that expectation.
- Entrepreneurs are driven
- by the US$100 billion market opportunity
- that represent compliance spending.
- This has created a market of over 300 startups
- which is fueled by
- cumulative US$100 billion of investments
- by VCs since 2012.
- To better understand the RegTech startup ecosystem,
- let’s start with some context.
- With the USA setting the tempo
- of global regulatory changes
- and characterised by a fragmentation
- of supervisory bodies,
- most of compliance spending will occur there.
- However, whilst the USA represents
- a strong natural client,
- the startup creation activity
- is predominantly based in Europe.
- As for Asia, the region represents
- 1/3 of global compliance spending
- but is underserved by home-grown RegTech startups.
- The 2008 financial crisis
- has represented a strong catalyst
- for regulatory changes across the world.
- The combination of fines, over 321 billion,
- regulatory changes which have tripled
- in the last three years
- and post-crisis reform implementation
- such as Dodd-Frank or Basel III
- has forced banks to increase their operating costs
- as a response to their new regulatory obligation.
- To just give you a sense of scale,
- a financial institution like JPMorgan has added
- another 14,000 legal and compliance staff since 2012.
- It is not unusual for banks
- to have 20 to 30% of their employees
- working in compliance-related function.
- This means that a tier one universal bank
- has more compliance officers and lawyers
- than Facebook has total employees.
- However, the number of recurring fines
- occurring post crisis is challenging the effectiveness.
- However, the numbers of recurring fines
- occurring post-crisis is challenging
- the effectiveness of simply adding up
- human resources to meet compliance obligation.
- Indeed, for each one dollar spent on compliance,
- three are being spent on regulatory fine.
- It seems that the compliance industry
- has difficulty to learn from its mistake.
- This is what RegTech startups
- are trying to address.
- A decade has passed since the crisis
- and since then most regulatory changes
- have been implemented.
- Financial institution are therefore now starting
- to look at how to automate compliance obligation
- and decrease the added recurring cost
- that has built up post crisis.
- RegTech startups are answering these demands.
- RegTech companies can be classified
- in three broad categories.
- Each time I will quickly illustrate them.
- First, regulatory compliance.
- Here we are going to find companies
- that are learning about regulatory changes
- and telling banks how this is going to impact
- their business logic.
- Second, risk management.
- It’s about identifying, for example,
- conduct risk to prevent another Libor scandal.
- Third, financial crime.
- How can we understand the ultimate beneficiary
- behind a shell company to avoid money laundering
- or terrorism financing?
- Within these three categories,
- the vast majority of startups
- are found in the regulatory compliance space.
- This reflects the fact
- that this represents a low hanging fruit for success
- mainly because data is available,
- it requires limited integration
- and it has a lower risk factor
- in case of error by a RegTech company.
- Similarly to FinTech companies,
- the majority of RegTech companies
- are B2B providers selling to financial institutions.
- Whilst demand from this client base is strong,
- it appears that the sales cycle remains long.
- On average, we’re talking about 12 months.
- Certain exceptions are noted
- especially in the context of
- upcoming regulatory deadline
- such as MiFID II or GDPR
- which therefore fast track the sales cycles
- and the procurement process.
- Additionally, I would like to mention
- that RegTech startups can also be found
- in two other areas worth mentioning.
- Firstly, regulators.
- The B2G or business-to-government space is growing.
- Regulators globally are engaging RegTech startups
- via various channels from hackathons
- to accelerators to find solution
- to enhance the supervisory and regulatory function.
- Similarly to financial institution,
- regulators are driven by the cost benefit
- provided by RegTech startups
- that can reach a factor of up to 10 times.
- These savings are actually especially important
- when considering the fact that tax payers’ money
- is used to finance regulators
- and their operating costs
- making it a strong public policy case.
- However, whilst having regulators as a client
- brings a lot of legitimacy,
- the lengthy procurement process
- is extended by additional tendering rules
- relative to sourcing supplies
- from the public sector.
- Secondly, certain FinTech companies
- are directly adding regulatory compliance process
- into their product.
- For example, in the context
- of wealth management space,
- funds products are now being sold
- and marketed only to pre-qualified investors
- by leveraging on their data
- to determine suitability, location and investment profile.
- Whilst for consumers, this provides
- a level of personalization of services;
- for financial institutions,
- this embeds regulatory compliance
- into the sales process
- and that’s important
- because it allows to avoid fines relative to mis-selling.
- Previously what the financial crisis has highlighted
- was that compliant and sales function
- were operating in silos.
- This overview concludes
- the RegTech startups ecosystem of Module 4.
4.6 RegTech Start-ups: Challenges
- Welcome back.
- Let’s talk about the very exciting topic of RegTech,
- RegTech, short for regulatory technology.
- But first, what is RegTech?
- RegTech is the use of new technologies
- to solve regulatory and compliance burdens
- not only more effectively but also more efficiently,
- and this has been an area that has been
- really booming in recent months and years.
- Why is that?
- Well, since the financial crisis,
- banks and other financial institutions
- have hired thousands of compliance officers
- or risk officers to try to help them comply with
- the various regulatory requirements around the world.
- Well, the good news now is we could use
- some of the latest technology,
- from artificial intelligence to big data analytics,
- to try to tackle some of these issues
- in many ways better than humans can.
- Let me give you a good example,
- anti-money laundering.
- Today, trying to stop the proceeds
- from criminal organisations or rogue nations
- from entering the global financial ecosystem
- is a big challenge.
- And, despite all our efforts,
- of all the different AML procedures
- and prophecies that we have in place,
- the success has not always been there.
- According to a recent study,
- we’re only able to capture
- less than 1% to 2% of laundered transactions
- around the world from entering the financial ecosystem.
- Well, the good news is this is hopefully
- an area that RegTech can help.
- We can use artificial intelligence
- and actually try to actually spark
- and actually improve the process of how we filter
- and actually monitor these transactions.
- And this is happening across
- various, various, various verticals
- of the broader regulatory space,
- from KYC, know your customer,
- and onboarding to regulatory reporting.
- But although RegTech sounds very interesting,
- that has also a lot of challenges.
- For example, if you’re a RegTech startup
- and you’re trying to sell to a bank,
- the sale cycles can be very, very long.
- Think about it.
- You know you’re dealing with
- a lot of sensitive information
- and actually a lot of regulatory information,
- where the downside for a bank for getting
- it wrong is actually very big.
- So, we actually are seeing these long sale cycles
- that are common when you’re trying to sell to a bank
- actually be even longer when it comes to RegTech.
- Also, not everybody,
- when it comes to in risk or compliance functions
- are as familiar with RegTech.
- While a lot of the business functions of a bank
- got familiar with FinTech in the last couple of years,
- we’re still in the early stages when it comes to RegTech
- with people in risk, compliance, or legal functions.
- But also probably more importantly,
- if a bank wants to use this new technology
- they need to be able to integrate this
- inside of the spaghetti of their legacy systems,
- all these different systems that the bank has been
- implementing over the years and now try to find a way
- to use this new technology to come in
- and actually be able to use it.
- So, there are still a lot of challenges,
- but the good news is we finally
- have a lot of the solutions available
- to help financial institutions,
- not only be more effective, but also be more efficient
- when it comes to regulations.
4.7 RegTech Ecosystem: Regulators
- The RegTech Ecosystem,
- in addition to traditional financial institutions
- and startups,
- also extends to regulators themselves.
- Think about it for a moment.
- In the context of KYC requirements,
- one of the major elements
- of a compliance framework,
- of the regulatory framework,
- is filing of what are called
- suspicious transaction reports.
- Any time a transaction,
- in most jurisdictions,
- over 10,000 US dollars is done in cash,
- that financial institution will have to
- file a report with the regulator.
- Likewise, any time
- any unusual transaction takes place
- with any of a bank’s millions of clients,
- a suspicious transaction report must be filed.
- Now, think about this
- from the standpoint of regulators
- that are receiving
- thousands of suspicious transaction reports
- from banks every single day.
- What do they do with these?
- Is it simply pieces of paper
- that they store in a warehouse?
- And historically,
- that is very often been the case.
- If an event would happen,
- a terrorist attack
- or a criminal conspiracy of some sort,
- regulators would then
- trawl back through those records
- to see if they could identify
- any additional information.
- But a better system would be
- regulators putting those reports
- in a digital format,
- which can be immediately
- subjected to data analytics,
- which would not only be useful
- after a terrorist attack occurs,
- in the context of tracing the financial flow,
- but it could potentially be used
- to prevent attacks
- or a criminal use
- of the financial system.
- And that is the idea of RegTech.
- Regulators themselves applying technology
- to achieve better regulatory outcomes.
- After all, anti-money laundering rules
- are not about
- producing suspicious transaction reports.
- They are about
- reducing the criminal or terrorist use
- of the financial system.
- And so,
- if technology can be applied
- by both the financial institutions themselves,
- as well as regulators,
- to better achieve that objective
- that is a very important development,
- and one of the biggest trends
- that we’re seeing in the context of
- today’s financial markets.
- Now, if we look at regulators,
- it is, in fact, not new for them
- to use technology in regulation.
- One of the longer-standing uses of technology
- by regulators in the context of regulation
- occurs in the context of insider trader,
- insider dealing.
- Insider dealing takes place
- when an insider of a company
- listed on a stock exchange
- buys or sells shares of that company
- on the basis of information,
- which is not available to the public.
- Remember we saw
- with the efficient market’s hypothesis
- that the idea of market’s functioning
- is based upon availability
- and if someone is using information
- to profit in markets,
- which is not more widely available,
- one, that is not good
- for market functioning
- and market trust,
- but it’s also unfair to other participants.
- One of the most common places or times
- that insider dealing takes place
- is in the context of
- the announcement of a merger or acquisition.
- That will typically take place
- at a certain day,
- a certain time,
- and regulators will use
- the electronic trading records
- of the stock exchange,
- and will look back
- through six months of data
- to see if there were
- any unusual transactions by insiders,
- like corporate directors or their families,
- during the period in the run-up
- to that announcement.
- That could then trigger an investigation
- and potentially an enforcement action.
- That is RegTech.
- Today if we’re looking at areas of
- regulators using RegTech,
- probably the three biggest that we see are,
- first, in the context of
- applying big data analytics techniques
- to the massive amounts of regulatory filings,
- which have exploded
- since the 2008 global financial crisis.
- Like a large financial institution
- is having to make several thousand reports
- to regulators around the world every day,
- regulators likewise
- are receiving thousands of reports,
- and are increasingly using that information,
- subjecting it to data analytics,
- in order to identify potential market risks
- or market violations.
- A related idea is
- what is called macroprudential policy.
- Prior to the global financial crisis,
- regulators tended to focus on
- the safety and soundness
- of individual financial institutions.
- The idea was that if you prevented
- each individual bank from failing
- that would prevent a financial crisis.
- What the 2008 crisis showed is that
- sometimes it is the interlinkages
- between participants in a financial system
- that causes the crisis.
- It is not what one is doing,
- but the fact that
- everyone is doing the same thing,
- and when a certain trigger event happens,
- it causes problems
- in the entire financial system.
- Since the global financial crisis,
- regulators have spent
- a very significant amount of effort and resources
- on coming up with ways
- to try to prevent crises from happening
- before they take place.
- And one of those areas
- is using data analytics,
- in particular in the context of regulatory filings,
- to try to identify risks
- prior to them actually happening.
- And finally, one that we’ve seen before,
- cybersecurity.
- As the financial system
- has become increasingly digitised,
- that has also increased its risks
- of hacking and cybersecurity.
- Perhaps the best example of this in recent years
- has been the hacking of Equifax.
- Equifax is a large company in the United States,
- which provides credit rating services.
- It collects massive amounts of data,
- uses that data to provide a credit score,
- which banks and other financial institutions
- then use as the basis of lending decisions.
- In 2017, it announced that all of its data
- had been hacked
- of over 140 million people.
- And that highlights that,
- as a financial system becomes more digitised,
- the risks of cybersecurity go up.
- And many would say today that
- cybersecurity is not the biggest financial risk,
- it’s not the biggest economic risk.
- Many would, in fact, say,
- that it’s the biggest national security risk as well.
- Because, after all, in addition to
- disrupting or stealing money,
- hackers can also seek to
- bring down large financial institutions
- in an effort to cause
- the collapse of the financial system
- and the economy.
- So, like financial institutions and startups,
- regulators, too, are a major part
- of the RegTech Ecosystem.
Payments & the Regulatory Landscape in Asia Pacific (KorumLegal)
- Hello, welcome to this lecture on payment services
- and the regulatory landscape for them in Asia Pacific.
- I’m Danh Nguyen, the General Manager
- and Managing Consultant for EMEA of KorumLegal.
- Most people are familiar with
- the term “financial services”.
- Less is understood about “payments”.
- Not many people know or understand what it means.
- “Payments” has traditionally been neglected
- or underserviced as an area of the law
- and as a subset of general banking
- and financial services.
- This is out of step with how payments
- have quickly evolved to become a hotspot of
- commercial and FinTech activity in recent years.
- In addition to the more traditional players
- such as the high street banks
- and credit card companies,
- like MasterCard and Visa,
- and global remittance players like Western Union,
- MoneyGram, PayPal,
- new players are constantly emerging.
- These include Monzo, Airwallex, TransferWise,
- WorldRemit, TransferGo, Aussie Forex,
- Paybase, Azimo, the list goes on.
- The level of innovation
- in this space is dizzying
- and many hundreds of millions of dollars
- are being poured into these companies
- by astute investors.
- So, what do we mean by payment service?
- At its simplest, a payment service
- is any service provided by a financial institution
- to allow a person or a business to pay
- another person or business
- for a product or service.
- A payment service provider offers merchants
- online services for accepting electronic payments
- by a variety of payment methods
- which includes credit cards,
- bank-based payments such as
- direct debit, bank transfers,
- and real-time bank transfers
- based on online banking.
- Typically, they use a Software as a Service model
- and form a single payment gateway
- for their clients to multiple payment methods.
- Payments also cover
- money transfer and remittances,
- cross-border payments
- including consumer to consumer,
- business to business, consumer to business,
- and business to consumer,
- and credit cards, debit cards,
- stored-value cards, and so on.
- Now that you understand better
- what is a payment service,
- let’s now touch on the regulatory frameworks
- for payment services in the Asia Pacific region.
- Until about eight years ago,
- the regulatory landscape for payments in APAC
- was relatively light-touch.
- Regulations were playing catch-up
- with the new technologies
- which allowed for an abundance of
- new products and services to emerge,
- including FinTechs.
- The existing regulatory frameworks in many countries
- were simply not equipped to
- address the many challenges
- and risks posed by these new technologies,
- products and services.
- Most of these laws were enacted at a time
- when these technologies did not exist
- or weren’t contemplated.
- For example, in Singapore,
- the relevant law,
- the Money Changing and Remittance Business Act,
- dates from 1979 and remained largely intact
- with few substantive updates
- or modifications for 40 years.
- The new law to replace it,
- the Payment Services Act 2019,
- was only gazetted in February 2019.
- It’s expected to come into effect sometime
- at the end of this year or early 2020.
- In Australia, remittance services
- and remittance service providers
- were not regulated until 2011
- when the Anti-Money Laundering
- and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act, 2006
- was substantially amended to provide for this.
- Lawmakers could not have imagined
- the full potential of technology
- to fundamentally transform how payment services
- would be provided to consumers
- and businesses in the digital age.
- Few could have predicted that you could send
- and receive money via your online messaging app,
- or with a few simple clicks on your smartphone,
- you can open a bank account
- or apply for a debit card.
- But lawmakers and
- regulators entrusted to enforce them
- have been catching up.
- They’ve been busy enacting new laws,
- or amending existing ones,
- to regulate these new activities and products.
- Since 2010, we’ve seen new payments
- or funds transfer laws being enacted
- in Japan, Singapore, Malaysia,
- Thailand, Indonesia, Australia,
- New Zealand and the Philippines.
- While each national law is different,
- they all essentially share some common themes.
- They all focus on AML/CTF compliance,
- good governance,
- effective technology risk management,
- the need for robust internal controls
- and frameworks, and consumer protection.
- For example, those against risks of fraud
- and unauthorised use
- or mishandling of customer funds.
- I will now speak a little more in-depth
- about one of these new laws,
- the Payment Services Act in Singapore.
- The stated objectives of
- the Monetary Authority of Singapore,
- the Central Bank of Singapore,
- were to streamline payment services
- under a single legislation,
- enhance the scope of regulated activities
- to address current and future developments
- in payment services,
- calibrate regulations according to the risks
- the activities pose by
- adopting a modular regulatory regime.
- The Payment Services Act
- adopts an activity-based approach
- to the licensing and regulation of payment services
- and classifies them under seven key activities.
- You can see these on the screen right now.
- More than one activity can be engaged in,
- but only one licence will be
- needed to cover all activities.
- Retail payment activities will be grouped
- into three main licence classes.
- Money changing licence,
- standard payment institution licence,
- and major payment institution licence.
- The regulation of licensees
- is calibrated according to their activities
- based on the risks
- and these regulatory concerns.
- Money laundering and terrorism financing,
- consumer user protection, interoperability,
- and technology risk management.
- No doubt, the emergence of new technologies
- has created tremendous opportunities
- for new players to enter
- this exciting and dynamic market.
- The financial services sector
- was ripe for disruption.
- Consumers have greater choice
- when it comes to the types and
- availability of financial services products.
- This has also enhanced financial inclusion
- and access for everyone.
- But with new opportunities,
- there are additional legal
- and compliance obligations and risk.
- Regulatory and compliance burdens for players
- seeking to operate in this space
- can be quite onerous
- and shouldn’t be underestimated.
- Scrutiny from regulators in the region
- has increased significantly.
- Regulators expect payment service providers
- to have in place robust compliance,
- risk management and governance frameworks
- to ensure that they can meet their legal
- and regulatory obligations,
- and to protect consumer rights and interests.
- There needs to be a thoughtful approach
- to compliance and risk management
- which will help the company to establish
- disciplined management of financial crimes,
- operational risk and consumer protection.
- Regulators also expect providers to
- take active steps to enforce the compliance
- and risk management framework,
- and to monitor compliance
- against the requirements.
- Navigating through these complex and
- onerous legal and regulatory regimes
- can be daunting.
- The costs of compliance can be high.
- In some cases, this may affect
- the commercial viability of their business.
- So having in place a well-thought out strategy
- and an effective and robust compliance
- and risk management framework will help
- the payment services providers
- to take full advantage of the opportunities
- that the new technologies offer.
- It can also cushion the business
- from the downside risks
- of running a non-compliant business.
- The legal, financial and reputational risks
- for the company
- and for its senior management team
- are far too great
- to simply ignore or downplay.
- But where the company has a good understanding
- of the regulatory requirements
- and a culture of compliance is promoted
- and embraced by senior management,
- the company is positioned well for success
- in this burgeoning area.
Industry Showcase: The Application of AI in Smart Regulation (Interview with John Craig from Mindbridge)
- Well, I think regulators are looking at technologies
- and startups such as MindBridge
- to be able to introduce new technologies and new ideas
- faster into the industry.
- In particular, in our case, we’re working with
- machine learning, artificial intelligence
- with organisations such as the Bank of England.
- And using that technology,
- they’re able to better review and regulate
- say the credit unions in the United Kingdom.
- So they use machine learning, artificial intelligence
- to be able to look at the liquidity ratios,
- make sure that the banks are performing
- the way they’re supposed to,
- and analysing for things such as trend shock
- when the bank introduces a new policy,
- how are all the credit unions changing
- in relation to each other
- and being able to better understand
- the different changes in policy that
- bank makes relative to the credit unions.
- I believe that regulators feel that
- startups are a cost benefit
- because they’re able to
- accelerate the use of the technology
- within their sphere of influence.
- Well, here in Asia, the industry players
- that are leading the charge are
- groups like the Hong Kong Exchange.
- And from a regulator perspective,
- I certainly see, you know, strong movement from
- say the Hong Kong Monetary Authority
- in terms of using technology
- such as artificial intelligence and machine learning
- to better understand the regulatory market.
- I think it’s already begun.
- I think regulatory technology
- has already started to become a widely used term
- in the industry, and as such,
- I think it’s going to only grow from here.
- It’s certainly well-established in North America,
- and I think it’s quickly gaining pace here in Asia.
4.8 Regulatory Sandboxes
- We’re now going to talk about Regulatory Sandboxes,
- a safe harbour for
- supervised innovation in financial market.
- The general perception of regulators
- is that they are slow and reactive.
- The Dodd-Frank Act illustrates this.
- It was passed in 2010,
- but its full implementation
- remains a work in progress.
- In almost ten years that have passed
- since the great financial crisis,
- what has emerged strongly is FinTech.
- Whilst the regulators have been
- implementing post-crisis reform,
- entrepreneurs have been busy.
- Today with the regulatory houses in order
- regulators are being to also embrace
- forward-looking innovation.
- The best illustration of this is the speed
- at which Regulatory Sandboxes have been announced.
- So far, over 12 have been announced in the world,
- out of which six have emerged in the last four months
- and the majority of them are in Asia.
- One might argue that
- the boom in Regulatory Sandboxes
- is yet another reactionary move driven by
- the jurisdiction’s fear of missing out
- on the chance of becoming or staying
- a meaningful financial centre.
- One can also argue that the intent behind establishing
- a Sandbox matter as much, or more,
- than their narrow regulatory outcome.
- Establishing a Sandbox demonstrates
- a Regulator’s desire to move forward
- towards a more proportionate regulatory framework
- that bounces risk with innovation.
- And whilst most Regulators seems to have realised
- that Sandboxes are not child’s play
- many are yet to invest adequate resources
- into their operation,
- either from a human capital perspective
- or technical capacity.
- Similarly, as with startups,
- Regulators will have to enter into
- a reiteration cycle to improve
- the quality of and add value to their Sandboxes.
- Regulators will need to keep their visions alive
- as Sandboxes are unlikely in the first year
- to deliver much by ways of result.
- Perhaps most importantly,
- regulators must ensure
- that in the event of another crisis
- they do not fully revert from the proactive approach
- that they have towards yet another reactive one.
- In other words, the innovative spirit
- of regulators needs to be nurtured and maintained
- as it does with entrepreneurs.
- Each needs to learn from the sum of their experience.
- Similarly to startups,
- regulators should cherish
- the journey because innovation
- and its effective regulation are ever evolving processes.
- This is not to say that regulation
- always follows innovation.
- India and Europe have demonstrated how reform
- can spur innovation and the rise of FinTech.
- However, we need to ask the question
- of how a proactive
- and adaptive regulatory framework can be created.
- At the core of this vision lies the numbers of
- well explored and established principle for regulators.
- First, financial stability at the macro and micro level.
- Second, market integrity and
- third, consumer protection.
- The challenge is using technology to develop
- a better way of doing things
- from the standpoint of regulators,
- the industry and infrastructure.
- As an example, whilst all regulators agree
- on the importance of AML and KYC,
- there has been limited harmonisation
- with respect to this most common form of compliance.
- Too often, the spirit of the law
- is distorted by its implementation.
- In the context of banks, this often takes
- the form of banks and regulators blaming
- the other for each failing to take
- the responsibility in addressing
- the question of why they cannot innovate.
- Lack of innovation is blamed on
- a mutual misunderstanding as to what is possible
- and how it can practically be achieved.
- Regulatory Sandboxes should become the new form
- for discussion in which the dominant outcome
- is promoting innovation rather
- than only trying to reduce risk.
- This means that the regulator should not seek
- to prevent all risk from occurring,
- but instead evaluate whether
- an innovation enhances or decreases risk
- in comparison to what already exists.
- Let’s take some examples.
- First, it’s about accepting driverless cars
- because they are statistically less likely
- to generate an accident as opposed
- to failing to support them because
- they have caused one or two accidents.
- Second, it’s about supporting facial recognition solution
- as the instances of fraud associated with them
- is likely to be far lower than
- with traditional chip and pin mechanism.
- For this to happen, regulators
- will need data and a lot of it.
- This is to ensure the true risk association
- with a given innovation are adequately estimated.
- Foreign experiences should also be taken
- into consideration as their data are used.
- The depth and size of the data necessary
- has placed immediate pressure
- on regulator’s resources.
- With limited staff,
- regulators will hit a bottleneck
- in their review, evaluation,
- and approval of innovation.
- As a result, regulators need to start
- embracing machine learning tools
- which will allow them
- to better understand large and unstructured data sets.
- For now, the largest simulation in the world is in China.
- China doesn’t need a regulatory Sandbox
- because the whole country is one.
- In its technology firm other kids playing in it.
- When Alibaba released
- its experimental credit scoring tool,
- Sesame Credit, it was quickly apparent
- that its credit scoring algorithm
- was being gained by its users.
- Sesame Credit was underpinned by the assumption
- that the more a person spends or receives,
- the more credit worthy they are.
- However people quickly started
- to send the same amount
- of money back and forth in order
- to increase their credit score.
- The unusual patent allotted to Alibaba
- and lent to the algorithm being readjusted.
- However, not every country has the capacity
- to run control experiment on the scale of China.
- These countries will either have to rely
- on machine learning tools or accept the risk
- of regulation lagging behind innovation.
- This is why Regulatory Sandboxes represent
- a critical addition to the toolkit
- of innovation available to regulators.
Industry Showcase: Balancing Innovation and Regulation Challenges in Hong Kong (Charles Mok)
- Now even in the context of China,
- we have seen some of the developments
- get to such a stage where they’ve had to come in,
- develop regulatory frameworks to balance out risks.
- And this is something that I think
- we’re seeing around the world
- and this is the idea of piloting,
- or a test-and-learn approach, regulatory sandboxes.
- And this idea of sandboxes was something
- that I wanted to ask you particularly about,
- coming from the tech side of things, and that is,
- we have these new regulatory sandboxes in finance,
- but where does this idea come from?
- It’s a good question.
- I think some of the regulators around world
- starting doing it first
- but Hong Kong started looking at it
- a couple of years ago, and said that particularly
- because as we said in our regulatory regime,
- we have to follow rules.
- Some companies come out and say
- I’m going to raise funds in this particular way,
- I’m going to issue a cryptocurrency
- in this particular way,
- and it’s that violate the existing laws.
- We’re not going to be able to allow them to do that,
- but if that’s the case,
- how do we balance the need for innovation
- and giving some of these things a good try?
- So we’ve been advocating that we should be trying
- this particular approach. You know, for Hong Kong,
- I think we have had some experience
- in the last couple of years.
- I hope that we would provide more incentives
- for some of these companies or banks
- or other institutions to try.
- Initially, the regulators were a bit more conservative,
- they only allowed banks to try
- and then the rest of the innovators,
- the startup companies, said well, then what do I do?
- I have to partner with a bank?
- Which means that in some cases
- this is exactly the reason
- why they want to do what they want to do
- is to not to work with the banks.
- So there have been some struggles in the beginning.
- An added problem for Hong Kong would be the facts
- that we have three different regulators,
- for banks, for insurance, and for securities,
- so which means that sometimes
- these regulatory sandbox environment
- would be a little bit more complicated.
- So those are being worked on and
- I think the regulatory sandbox experience is improving,
- but I just came back from Silicon Valley,
- having visited some of the companies over there,
- including some of the startup companies
- in FinTech over there.
- I think what we need is a bit more promotion,
- because that’s also important.
- Sometimes they say
- hey, we didn’t know that Hong Kong,
- you have this particular environment
- that we could give it a try.
- But I’ve heard of other economists or countries saying
- that they have this regulatory sandbox.
- So I think now that we have something
- that might be might be good,
- we’d better give it the right promotion
- to make sure that more people
- around the world know about it,
- because after all, one of the most important things
- about FinTech that I believe, is that the nature of it
- is going to be quite global.
- And also that’s one of the advantages
- that Hong Kong has
- is being a traditional financial services centre.
- We have the expertise, we have the banking
- and the financial service expertise in Hong Kong,
- not to mention the technology expertise.
- And so we should leverage this particular advantage
- to attract more startups or people around the world
- to say hey, maybe I should give my idea a good try
- in Hong Kong.
- Yeah, I very much agree with that.
4.9 Smart Regulation
- We suggest that RegTech goes beyond
- simple use of technology
- for compliance or regulatory purposes
- and also extends to cooperative efforts
- between policymakers, regulators, startups,
- and traditional financial institutions
- to build better financial systems.
- We call this the idea of smart regulation.
- Smart regulation suggests that
- in the context of today’s technological transformation
- of the financial system,
- it is possible for the first time
- to redesign underlying infrastructure,
- the plumbing of the global financial system
- to make the financial system
- work better and effectively,
- The idea of this is first,
- a need for better information and monitoring
- that regulators need not only
- to follow what is going on
- in traditional financial institutions
- but they also need to be aware of new entrants,
- whether those are FinTech startups,
- or TechFins,
- and also evolution of technologies.
- Whether those technologies
- are things like cryptocurrencies,
- blockchain, cloud techniques
- or anything more that emerges
- in coming years.
- So the first stage is really
- an understanding of what is going on.
- Without an understanding,
- a regulator cannot do a proper job
- of balancing the objectives of
- economic growth and financial stability.
- From that basis,
- one can work together
- to design better systems.
- And really, the starting point in smart regulation
- is systems design.
- It is the idea of digitising regulation
- so that regulatory requirements
- to the greatest extent possible
- can be conducted or met by industry participants
- in a digital form.
- Digitising reporting requirements
- and other compliance requirements
- allows financial institutions to submit reporting
- and other obligations to
- regulators in a digitised form.
- That process of digitization
- immediately makes it more straightforward
- for regulators as well as the industry
- to apply processes of data analytics,
- of datafication
- in order not only to
- better achieve regulatory objectives,
- but also to reduce costs
- and increase efficiencies
- as well as discover new opportunities.
- The idea of smart regulation
- is that technology is no longer the limiting factor
- in how a financial system or its regulation works.
- But to take advantage of these new opportunities,
- we must be aware of
- what the technology can do
- as well as the existing inefficiencies
- in many of our systems,
- and that is a RegTech process
- of designing financial infrastructure.
4.10 Redesigning Financial Intrastructure: India Stack
- This idea of designing better financial infrastructure
- is core to the idea of FinTech and RegTech’s
- re-conceptualization and reconsideration,
- recreation of both domestic
- and global financial systems.
- We can see this happening
- in two big examples.
- The first is one that
- we’ve already looked at in the EU.
- The development of a series of
- new legal frameworks
- reflected in MiFID II, PSD2, and GDPR,
- which are transforming the way
- that the financial system
- in the European Union works.
- The second is in the context of India.
- And something that we’ve seen
- throughout the course so far
- is that China is probably the most advanced,
- the most exciting digital transformation
- that we’ve seen so far in the context
- of this FinTech environment,
- but the other transformation
- which is taking place now
- is in many ways just as exciting,
- and that is the digital transformation
- that is taking place in India.
- In India about eight years ago,
- a group of tech entrepreneurs
- set about designing a strategy
- to build a new system of digital infrastructure
- to transform not only the Indian financial system
- but access to finance
- by the majority of the Indian population
- and also India’s economy
- and economic growth prospects more generally.
- In some ways, this was partially a reaction
- to the success that we’ve seen
- in China’s long-term economic transformation
- since the late 1970s.
- The idea in India is a series of interlinked pieces
- called India Stack.
- The foundation of the India Stack
- is a new digital biometric ID system.
- That digital biometric ID system
- includes 10 fingerprints
- and two iris scans
- for each individual who is issued with an ID.
- And since 2010,
- over 1.2 billion people in India
- have been issued with new digital IDs.
- That is more than the iPhone sold
- in the same period from its launch in 2007.
- The digital IDs in India
- are the largest IT rollout
- in the history of the world.
- Well, that’s a good start.
- Digital identity to make it possible
- for immediate authentication
- of any individual’s identity.
- The second level has been a system built on
- an electronic payment system that is open,
- open API,
- which means that it is open
- not only to traditional banks,
- but also to new entrants.
- This payment system allows digital payments
- to be made from one ID holder
- to another very rapidly.
- It also allows the entrance of
- new forms of business,
- whether those are payment providers
- or robo-advisory services
- or P2P lending and others.
- The third level involves
- increasing the use of bank accounts.
- And India three years ago,
- only about 1/3 of its population
- would have had a bank account,
- roughly 350 million people.
- Now, as a result of a process
- whereby government salaries are paid into accounts,
- pensions and other benefits,
- agricultural supports and the like
- are all paid into individual bank accounts,
- there has been an explosion
- in the number of bank accounts in India.
- Over the past five years,
- over 300 million new bank accounts
- have been opened in India,
- more than the population of the United States,
- and to the point where now for the first time,
- over half of the population of India
- has a bank account,
- a bank account that is linked to their digital ID
- and to an electronic payment system
- that allows instantaneous payments
- across the financial system.
- The final element of this system
- brings us back to the ideas of KYC.
- An e-KYC system, an e-KYC utility
- where individuals have
- a sort of Dropbox-like account
- where they can place digitised documents
- which are the necessary filing requirements
- for KYC requirements
- across a range of financial institutions.
- As a result of this combination of factors,
- India has not only exploded the number of people
- using bank accounts
- and using the financial system,
- it has also dramatically reduced the time taken
- and the cost for opening an account
- and as an added benefit
- dramatically reduced the cost of corruption
- in a previously cash-based economy.
- In November 2016,
- the Indian government announced
- an incredible experiment
- what was called demonetization.
- The government said that
- 86% of the cash bills in circulation in the country
- were no longer valid,
- that those paper notes
- had to be turned in at a bank
- and either left in a bank account
- or exchanged for new bills
- which would be issued.
- Now, the intention of this initiative
- was to crackdown on corruption,
- to basically catch dark money
- that was operating
- outside of the formal financial system,
- but its big impact was in the context of
- driving digital transformation
- of the Indian financial system.
- And that was possible
- because of the infrastructure
- which had already been put in place
- via the India Stack strategy.
- Literally, hundreds of millions of people
- for the first time
- are now using digital forms of money
- for payments, lending and investing
- that previously would have been cash based.
- We have seen an explosion
- in the amount of money in the financial system,
- which has reduced interest rates.
- It has also increased liquidity available
- for startups seeking to raise money
- in the economy.
- And as with China’s digital transformation,
- countries around the world
- but particularly in Asia
- have been watching India’s process very closely.
- And an increasing range of countries,
- from Bangladesh to Thailand
- to Indonesia and beyond
- are seeking to develop similar strategies
- to enable them like China has done
- and like India is in the process of doing
- to leapfrog
- to a new digitally based financial system.
Additional Resource Insights
References and Suggestions for Further Reading
- FinTech, RegTech and the Reconceptualization of Financial Regulation (Academic Paper: Arner, Barberis, Buckley)
- Financial Stability Issues from FinTech (Industry Report – Financial Stability Board (FSB))
- Regulating a Revolution: From Regulatory Sandboxes to Smart Regulation (Academic Paper: Zetzsche, Buckley, Arner Barberis)
- RegTech 102: The Evolution of RegTech and the Future of Regulatory Compliance (Industry Report – CB Insights)
Module 5 Data & TechFin
Welcome to Module 5
5.1 Module 5 Introduction
- Welcome back to the HKU FinTech course.
- You are now in module 5,
- and we’ll be talking about data.
- As you may know, data is the new oil,
- and what this means is that it becomes
- an increasingly valuable commodity both for you
- as individuals, financial institutions,
- or technology companies.
- In this module, we will be covering
- each of these aspects.
- First, we’re going to be talking to you as an individual.
- How is GDPR in Europe
- covering and impacting businesses
- as well as you as an individual?
- What about digital identity?
- How a piece of password can now be condensed
- in a piece of data,
- and how that piece of data
- can better define who you are,
- and therefore customise experiences around you.
- We’ll then be also looking
- at the financial services industry.
- They have been using data since the 1970s,
- and have been able to deliver new financial products
- on the back of this.
- However, there is challenge on doing so at scale.
- Startups and the FinTech transformation
- is also one which is underlied by the use
- of technology and data accessibility
- both by technology companies
- as well as the financial institutions.
- On the technology company side,
- we’ll be talking about the challenges
- brought by TechFin companies,
- as well as the governments of AI.
- And finally, regulators.
- The increased value of data means
- that more and more people want to
- access it by legal and illegal means.
- And therefore, the regulation of data
- from a data privacy perspective,
- or the protection of data
- from a technological perspective,
- will also be addressed in this module.
Module 5 Learning Objectives
Module 5 discusses data, data regulation, data security and the emergence of TechFin. In focuses on both the opportunities as well as the risks and challenges arising from the process of digitization and datafication in finance, as well as policy and regulatory approaches and their implications for business.
In Module 5, learners will:
- Understand the role of data in financial services
- Consider various approaches to data protection and privacy
- Think about the challenges of digitization and datafication, particularly cybersecurity and technological risk
- Discuss the emergence of TechFins and the implications for financial services
5.2 History of Data Regulation
- When looking at data
- and how it has been regulated over time,
- there are different elements to it.
- First, we can approach data from a privacy perspective.
- A lot of you can relate to this
- when we look at data breaches that infect
- your personal information being released to the public.
- What has been happening with Facebook
- and how that data, for example,
- has been used in the context of political elections,
- both in the US and in Europe.
- Data privacy matters
- because it’s all about protecting your personal life,
- and that life is increasingly now online.
- The second element is about
- cross-border data management,
- and whilst digitization is a global phenomenon,
- cross-border data management
- is not necessarily something
- which is as automatic than one may think,
- and there’s some right reason to do so.
- Certain jurisdictions are, for example,
- much more stringent about data residency rules,
- where data can only be held and stored
- in a single country and not leave it.
- This is one of the big problems for FinTech companies.
- Whilst FinTech companies have global ambition,
- data regulation, especially on how
- cross-border data management is done,
- can be a real limiting factor for their ambition of growth.
- Why? Because for example, a regulator in a Country A
- may not want that the data of its consumer
- transferred to Country B where it will be processed
- and then the insight brought back to Country A.
- This can be for many different reasons,
- including national sovereignty and national security.
- Since 2007, the financial crisis has shown
- that financial services stability
- is a national sovereignty issue, and as a result,
- data residency and data protection is equally important.
- The third element is data management.
- This is how people will access and control their data.
- One of the topic that, for example,
- we’ve covered in Module 4 was GDPR,
- and here it’s about this idea that
- every single piece of data
- should be able to be traced back
- to its individual owner, if it identified him.
- And if it does, that owner should have the right
- of querying the institution who has seen that data,
- how many times the data has been used,
- and how the data is actually being used,
- and in which countries.
- This is the idea of data that could be accounted
- as a liability or an asset, from a financial perspective.
- However, from all perspective,
- data and its regulation
- should be looked from another angle.
- It should be looked from an angle
- where data equals money,
- and all the rights and obligation attributed to it
- should be similar to money.
- Data would therefore have a property right,
- a commercial right,
- and that can be transferred, exchanged, borrowed,
- or leased to someone else.
- And this matters a lot.
- It matters because it will allow digital identity
- and data sovereignty to keep on growing as an industry.
- It also matters because as the economy
- is going from a service economy to a digital economy,
- more and more individuals will be looking at ways
- of monetising their data to supplement,
- if not totally replace their income.
- So far, this topic of data regulation hasn’t emerged yet
- because the money that can be made
- from data monetisation
- has not passed the poverty line.
- However, when this will happen,
- a real question will be raised
- at the regulatory and the policy level
- on how that data regulation should be approached.
- From a trend perspective,
- we can imagine that this will mainly
- happen in countries like Asia.
- This is because, proportionally,
- the value of data from an individual in Asia
- is higher compared to their salary
- to what you would have in Europe.
- For example, someone in Vietnam
- earning 8,000 US dollar a year,
- but having their data worth 50 US dollar a year,
- has a higher value as a proportion
- of their data to their salary,
- compared to a European person
- earning 50,000 US dollars a year,
- but only having 50 US dollar worth of data.
- This is why the future of data regulation
- and data being treated as money
- is mainly going to come from places like Asia.
- However, so far, the regulatory tempo
- has clearly been set by Europe,
- which has one of the most stringent and complete
- regulatory regime around data management,
- which is followed across the world and including Asia.
5.3 Data in Financial Services
- The importance of data in the economy
- has been captured by Professor Klaus Schwab,
- executive chairman of the World Economic Forum.
- His analysis entails that the world
- is entering a fourth industrial revolution
- powered by artificial intelligence
- and being distinguished
- in its characteristic of hyper scalability,
- which we will discuss more in module 6.
- Importantly, the fourth industrial revolution
- has been built on top of the third era,
- which started in the 1970s,
- thanks to computer and automation.
- As we have seen throughout this course,
- technological progress
- and financial market development
- have a close relationship.
- Professor Schwab’s third era
- of computer and automation coincides
- with the digitization of financial services,
- which we discussed in module three.
- And in this lecture, we are instead
- projecting ourself forward,
- aiming to answer the following questions.
- How can the data created since the 1970s
- be used meaningfully in financial services?
- And what does the fourth industrial revolution look like
- for financial markets?
- The importance lies in the fact
- that as with any large economic shift,
- the relationship of money
- and power is being redistributed.
- As such, answering if financial institutions need
- to become data companies matters.
- Should their business model move
- towards a data refining instead
- of interest or fee-based income?
- In order to find answers,
- we will present three examples
- in exploring in turns, big data,
- artificial intelligence, and analytics tools.
- Let’s start with the hedge funds industry.
- They have historically been distinguishing themselves
- by their capacity of using quantitative skills
- and hiring a lot of Math scientists.
- They have increasingly been leveraging
- an external and new alternative data
- to make better investment decisions.
- For example, the use of geolocation data
- was used to estimate the footfall
- in shopping malls, and therefore predict
- the growth of sales ahead of public quarterly reports,
- allowing to make an investment decision
- before public information is out.
- In the context of the insurance industry,
- we have seen usage-based insurance changing
- the current flat-fee insurance model
- and instead moving towards
- a pay-as-you-go service
- centred around your lifestyle.
- This has been made possible by the increase
- of telematic solutions,
- such as trackers in your car,
- or your mobile phone,
- which is then analysed for better pricing.
- Here, data is being used
- to change the underwriting decision model
- whilst becoming the most cost-effective option
- for you as a customer.
- Finally, in banking,
- by using predictive analytics,
- a bank is able to monitor the spending patterns
- of a consumer, and then
- infer if a larger purchase will be made.
- The size of that purchase will then define whether
- the bank should proactively propose
- a consumer loan or mortgage.
- Likewise, a very simple example
- is taking a travel insurance as soon as
- you buy a plane ticket with your credit card.
- Now, these examples illustrate that data
- has previously been used in financial services,
- but this has not been equally done by all.
- This is mainly due to the fact
- that data today remains a by-product
- of activity as opposed to a core asset that is valued.
- To make this change across the industry,
- new C-level roles are emerging,
- such as Chief Data Officer.
- Regulators are also concerned by this,
- and you saw that in module 4
- when we were covering the topic of smart regulation
- and what it means from a human capital perspective
- for the regulators.
- Now, in order to enhance the value of data,
- whether internal or external,
- going forward, financial institution will need
- to consider the three Vs of data.
- First, volume.
- The combination of behaviour tracking
- and Internet of Things is increasing
- the amount of data points available.
- Second, velocity.
- The speed at which data is created requires
- the need for real time analytics,
- as it challenges the current storage capacity.
- Third, variety.
- The ability to handle,
- understand structured and unstructured data
- from internal or external sources.
- As this transformation process occurs,
- FinTech startups are increasingly providing
- the necessary analytical tools to process
- and analyse data held by financial institutions.
- For now, these remain narrow use cases
- and include identification of credit risk
- in loan portfolio, transaction of quarterly reports
- into investment advice,
- or performing complete audit risk review.
- Whilst these have always been performed by banks,
- today the combination of data availability
- and analytical tools make it possible
- to do these in seconds instead of hours,
- and this is done without a trade-off on accuracy levels.
- Hopefully, this will provide banks a capacity
- to restore profitability levels,
- whilst for consumer,
- create a new era of invisible finance,
- one that support your lifestyle instead
- of creating friction as you’re trying
- to achieve your goals.
Industry Showcase: Application of Data Analytics in Finance (vPhrase)
- Hello everyone, I’m Neerav Parekh.
- I’m the founder of a company called vPhrase.
- We’re from India.
- I’ll tell you about how AI
- is being used in the data analytics space
- for FinTech companies.
- So, we created a product that a lot of institutions use
- for improving their report.
- Let me give you a few examples.
- Motilal Oswal which is one of the largest brokerages,
- they use a platform for creating portfolio analysis
- for their investors,
- so we examine 500,000 portfolios every month
- and create statements for the investors.
- The whole idea is to give them
- the key insights in the portfolio, using language.
- So, AI is being used to generate language from data
- to explain all the insights to the leader.
- So, that is one example.
- Another large very large private bank in India
- is using our platform to create personalised reports
- for the branch managers,
- so the whole performance of the branch,
- all the data is taken in,
- is analysed and language is written
- to explain to the branch manager
- how exactly is this branch doing.
- So, a few bullet points we’ll tell him,
- Ok if your branch’s achieving its targets,
- which products that are doing well,
- which products that are not doing well and so on.
- Then there’s another large investment bank
- which is using our platform
- for risk analysis of stocks and mutual funds.
- So, they study the performance of mutual funds,
- they study the performance of companies
- and we use that data to create risk analysis reports
- for them on those stocks and mutual funds.
- So, as you’ll see,
- we’re using AI for data analysis
- and then creating language,
- natural language generation,
- so that people can understand the data better.
- Enterprises can make their reports
- easier to understand for their people.
- Thank you.
Industry Showcase (NEW): How Startups are Transforming the Asset Management Landscape in Hong Kong? (MioTech)
- Hi, my name’s Jason Tu
- and I am the CEO and Co-Founder of MioTech.
- We are a startup for financial institutions
- to better manage and draw insights into their data.
- Our company is two years old
- and we began this journey in Hong Kong,
- the largest financial hub here in Asia.
- Just how important is this market?
- In 2018, the Hong Kong Stock Exchange
- actually snatched the crown jewels of IPO listings,
- raising more than US$36.6 billion for 208 companies.
- Hong Kong’s Asset and Wealth Management Business
- reached more than US$3 trillion Asset
- on the management
- based on SFC’s annual survey in 2017,
- effectively making Hong Kong the No. 1 leader in Asia.
- This is just to give you a gist of how important
- financial services is to Hong Kong, and vice versa.
- Now let’s take a look at the ecosystem
- surrounding Asset Management.
- For every trade, from the back office perspective,
- it will go through custodians, exchange,
- clearing and settlement agencies,
- and possibly, fund administrators
- until accurate information is reflected
- in Asset Manager’s hands.
- From a front office perspective,
- for every investment opportunity,
- the asset manager
- needs to gather conventional data sets
- such as prices, volumes, as well as,
- unconventional data sets
- such as news, and alternative data.
- Asset Managers are at the top of the pyramid,
- they digest all these information
- in order to deliver return
- and avoid risks on their financial assets.
- So, where are the opportunities in this industry
- for a startup
- and particularly in Hong Kong?
- This goes back to Hong Kong’s unique role
- as the gateway to both China
- and broadly speaking, Asia.
- From the data and technology perspective,
- the market data
- and market intelligence industry in Hong Kong
- is still dominated by
- western market data providers,
- with a lack of coverage
- and understanding of the local markets.
- These large multi-national players
- also have decades of company history
- and very large complex corporate structure
- that don’t allow them to adopt new technologies
- as fast as startups can.
- The lack of data coverage on Asia
- and slow innovation on the technology side
- creates opportunities for disrupters to fill the gap.
- From a product and user experience perspective,
- the entire financial software industry
- is lagged behind the consumer app
- and Software-As-A-Service industry.
- From Google, Facebook to Slack, Zendesk,
- user centric design and browser based enterprise
- applications have completely changed
- both the consumer and enterprise world.
- There is a huge opportunity to create a product
- that adapts to the modern user
- as compared to having clients to adapt
- to decades-old financial software
- that was created
- before most of the younger traders were born.
- The question is how?
- There are a number of tips
- I can offer to entrepreneurs
- aiming to change the asset management industry.
- First of all,
- Hong Kong has unparalleled advantage
- in its access to the Greater China Region
- and the rest of Asia.
- However, entrepreneurs should keep in mind
- that understanding Hong Kong isn’t enough,
- but rather, you should be eager
- to learn the needs in Greater China and Asia,
- the places where Hong Kong has access to,
- that’s where your users are.
- Second of all,
- the asset management industry
- already has a very complex business structure
- compared to other industries.
- We have to be very careful
- about business model innovations,
- and not to introduce more complexity.
- Technology innovation, on the other hand,
- has much more room to improve efficiency
- and reduce complexity.
- Last but not the least,
- as I’m speaking here right now,
- talent is the single most important factor
- to innovation.
- I’m hopeful that Hong Kong will attract
- more technology talents to mix up
- with these finance professionals
- to disrupt and to make a difference together.
Industry Showcase (NEW): Digitisation of Financial Services – A DBS Approach (Parts 1) (DBS)
- Disclaimer: Views expressed are personal and do not reflect the views or thoughts of any organization the speaker may be affiliated/associated with.
- Ladies and gentlemen, just to set the scene
- and introduce myself.
- I’m Mark Li
- and I run a digital program office
- for transaction banking in DBS.
- So I’m really happy to be invited
- by the University of Hong Kong
- to talk about the digitalisation of financial services,
- So my first question to all of you is:
- Why does a traditional bank need to go digital?
- Why can’t traditional banks just stay
- within their comfort zone
- and run their business as usual?
- The reason is pretty simple.
- Just to stay competitive.
- In recent years, we have been
- experiencing gigantic changes
- brought by internet companies
- such as Tencent, Alibaba, Amazon, etc.
- They are opening up
- their own affiliated financial subsidiaries
- to engage in businesses that traditionally banks
- are doing for a really long time ago.
- We also see an increasing number of
- startup companies that are focusing on
- a single banking function and customer segment.
- Within this, you can always find
- that they may do a better job
- than banks in terms of customer experience
- and product offering.
- Cost is another reason.
- By putting up brick-and-mortar data centre in the clouds,
- banks will be able to enjoy a lower cost
- while expanding the banking business.
- I’m not here to promote any banks
- or any digital aspiration
- but there are a few things I wish I could share
- which I have been strongly inspired
- by the top management in DBS.
- Once our CEO Piyush has said,
- “DBS is not a bank anymore.
- Our competitors are not our fellow friends
- in our banking industry anymore.
- Our competitors are what I mentioned just now,
- Alibaba, Amazon and Google.
- We have to think, act and transform
- like a technology company.”
- That’s why DBS is a 27,000 startup.
- How does this bank transform themselves?
- In short, the entire backend is 85% cloud.
- Yes, it reduces cost, improve resilience and scalability.
- Across Asia, they have more than 180 APIs
- and 60 API partners.
- And their connectivity for client ranges
- from all kinds such as transacts,
- FX enquiries and ecosystems.
- And that they have a philosophy and practise
- that digitalise the entire internal process,
- increases productivity, joy space
- (which is work without any fixed space)
- that promotes collaboration across units,
- space improvement and optimization.
- This is what I believe the basics of a new digital bank.
- And GANDALF, of course, it is quite a funny thing,
- as all of you may have watched
- “The Lord of The Rings and the Hobbit”,
- GANDALF over there is very different from
- the DBS GANDALF.
- Here it means Google, Apple,
- Netflix, I’ll put the D aside,
- Amazon, LinkedIn and Facebook.
- All of them are technology bigwigs
- who have reinvented their products and ways of working
- to suit the rapid technology advancements
- and yes, this is a digital bank.
- And of course, the D over here,
- I hope it means DBS and of course, the digital bank.
- This shows a bank aspiration to become one of
- the disruptors that can change and rock the markets.
- And most importantly, it is not only a slogan.
- It means a fundamental culture change.
- A shift from projects to products and delivery.
- Developing high performing agile teams
- rather than just project management,
- automating everything, yes, everything.
- Designing for modern systems
- means simple deployment,
- organising for success and most importantly,
- adopting all of these habits of large innovation
- by providing fresh and new user experience.
- The best thing of it is they don’t work in the box
- but focuses at client deliverables,
- such as co-creating solutions alongside of clients,
- practise business agile,
- solving real-life problems,
- and that is digital.
- In consumer banking group,
- we have APIs that promotes
- instant credit card promotion from transaction banking
- from where I come from, of course,
- with corporate insurance firms communicating
- and transacting with us through APIs.
- For treasury and markets,
- we quote rates and transact real time on FX
- with clients through APIs.
- Even from a system perspective,
- we have created a blockchain community
- with suppliers and anchors
- to promote a better trade environment.
- As you can see from these three examples,
- we are fully automated from top to bottom.
- From client interface to back-end processing.
- From client’s connectivity to internal dot-and-node.
- My experience of DBS, this bank,
- the Digital Bank of Singapore, we always joke,
- you can really feel a huge change and difference
- in people’s mindsets.
- The way they work, the way things are structured.
- This 27,000 startup
- is so willing to experiment
- and practise with the customers
- and one thing I’m really amazed
- is that doing business reviews
- or even day-to-day meetings,
- we do not use PowerPoints or Excels.
- We do not create meeting decks
- but instead, we use dashboards and data
- for business decision.
- We are hugely obsessed with data.
- Data is our DNA and data is our basis
- for business decision.
- Many examples I can quote in the business environment
- how data is being utilised to justify investments,
- our lending principles,
- collaboration across business groups or data driven.
- Traditional banks like DBS
- can actually be a FinTech ourselves.
- Transform ourselves into a digital bank
- which embraces many qualities below.
- Digital management and staff culture,
- Cloud-based and API-based technology
- across all kinds of clients’ footsteps,
- open to external clients’ connectivity
- and most importantly, they’re able to accept failure
- and adopt to changes very, very quickly.
Industry Showcase (NEW): Digitisation of Financial Services – A DBS Approach (Part 2) (DBS)
- Disclaimer: Views expressed are personal and do not reflect the views or thoughts of any organization the speaker may be affiliated/associated with.
- Another critical part of digital transformation
- is to understand the legacy issues we are facing
- we not only for DBS but also as a bank as a whole
- and we have to improve with a digital mindset.
- A few legacy examples, physical cash for all of us today
- who really comes up without physical cash
- in Hong Kong and Asia?
- Let’s talk about branch needs for banks,
- whether you agree or not, there’s still a strong demand
- for physical branches in Hong Kong and in Asia
- what kind of services
- really needs to be done in branches?
- Or can we move in digital,
- even in terms of transaction and transparency?
- Why can our fellow friends in the FinTech market
- such as TNG or Tap & Go
- offer instant overseas remittance at very low costs,
- but many traditional banks cannot?
- Account and mortgage opening at least 4 to 8 weeks
- if not even able to complete the entire process
- not to mention it is hugely paper-based
- for majority of banks in Hong Kong,
- if not even the region,
- of course, one thing on emerging customers as well
- in the way they interface with the buyers,
- can they rely on bank to offer
- an omni-channel experience,
- or they need to have many devices
- with different turnaround times and agreements?
- For customer information retrieval,
- why does bank data need to be retrieved from
- internet banking but not embedded into daily apps?
- These exactly are many legacy issues
- that I can make one simple conclusion:
- We need to offer
- a brand new digital experience to our customers.
- Change management is hard
- and transformation comes with
- both by time, disruption and experience.
- And bank in a Hong kong example,
- by collaborating with HKMA, HKICL,
- fellow banking industry, SVFs and corporate customers,
- we are trying to incorporate Faster Payments
- and various SVF payments into our daily lives
- in different progress.
- The same for account opening,
- there are many elements over here,
- one is CDD (Client Due Diligence) and KYC (Know Your Customer) process
- and the other is internal setup within banks ourselves.
- For the former,
- I truly do not see how this can change much over time.
- So let’s talk about the latter,
- this can be improved
- by a fully automated and digitalised process
- that’s within the bank’s back end,
- instant data interchange of credit bureaus,
- collaborating with RegTechs,
- and of course with support from the government
- in creating a digital, retail and corporate identity record.
- The greatest difference across virtual banks
- versus traditional banks is that
- many VBs claim they can provide
- a better customer journey
- and customer experience to our customers.
- My question again is: Why can’t traditional banks do so?
- In 2025, I believe for banks to succeed,
- they cannot exist alone.
- They cannot offer lending standalone
- offers standalone internet banking platforms,
- and of course maintaining competitive for customers
- to transact or even to sell insurance,
- banks need to stay connected, like our customers’ life
- for example, in DBS’ ambition of “Live More Bank Less”,
- having invisible banking,
- or providing banking service in an ecosystem
- or together with partners in the world or in Hong Kong,
- I believe this is the key for future.
- I believe this is the new era
- where banking service can be invisible,
- in behind of daily lives or business services,
- without going to detail into the process,
- there are few ways traditional banks can actually help
- to be a FinTech ourselves
- and participate in these ecosystems build up
- by participating in partners’ platforms
- so that we can engage with the customers
- across partners’ customers journeys,
- or by creating platforms alone
- that connects third parties’ platforms together
- and of course creating an ecosystem
- of course limited by the bank’s size and strength.
- This is a dilemma over here:
- I believe banks need to be
- as inclusive into our customers daily lives if possible,
- on the other hand, I do not believe a bank
- can never and will never be able to create interfaces
- that covers all segments,
- it must be through ecosystem partnership,
- it must be through enabling with FinTech partners,
- it must be through collaboration
- with many other financial institutions
- in an automated manner
- embracing collaboration over competition.
- So thank you ladies and gentlemen,
- I hope by sharing right now
- of how a bank can actually work as a FinTech
- and also collaborate with other FinTechs
- can drive more change and momentum
- in a market for Hong Kong and for Asia
- to be more digital and more innovative.
5.4: European Big-Bang: PSD2 / GDPR / Mifid2
- We’ve seen across this course
- how technology has transformed finance,
- and in particular, we’ve seen how finance
- has transformed finance in China,
- perhaps more so than any other place in the world,
- how firms such as Ali Baba and Tencent
- and their financial subsidiaries like
- Ant Financial and WeBank
- have led a digital transformation,
- driving finance in China
- from a cash-based, bank-based system
- to one which is based largely on data and technology,
- digital forms of payment,
- digital forms of lending,
- digital forms of investment,
- all based upon techniques of automation,
- big data, and increasingly, artificial intelligence
- to build a framework
- for an entirely new 21st-century form of finance.
- We’ve also seen in the context of India
- how India has been seeking
- to build a digital infrastructure
- to support the transformation of its financial system.
- Likewise, in the European Union,
- a series of changes coming into effect in 2018
- are fundamentally transforming the relationship
- between finance and data, setting the stage
- for a new European financial system
- not based on monetization of finance,
- but rather on monetization of data.
- And these three pieces go by
- the short names of GDPR, PSD2, and MiFID II,
- three rather uninteresting strings of letters,
- but fundamentally transforming the way
- that finance and data relate in the context of the EU.
- First, GDPR.
- GDPR is the General Data Protection Regulation,
- and this has evolved out of a long process of building
- a legal framework for privacy
- and data protection in the EU.
- GDPR is fundamentally about giving individuals power
- and control over their individual personal data.
- It allows individuals to direct
- holders of their personal data
- to delete it, forget it, transfer it,
- and in any way that it is the data of the individual,
- rather than the data of the company, of the firm.
- And this is fundamentally transforming the way
- that businesses think about their relationship
- to their customer and their data.
- This in particular is a big challenge for tech firms
- like Google or Facebook or Ali Baba or Tencent.
- Another second area is what is called
- the Payment Services Directive 2.
- PSD2 sets new rules to allow open entry of a wide range
- of new entrants to the payments industry.
- But beyond allowing
- an increasing range of new entrants
- and encouraging digitization
- and transparency of payments,
- PSD2 also creates a series
- of requirements for open banking.
- In other words, for a customer,
- if a bank has your data,
- information about your financial history,
- your financial transactions, your financial accounts,
- PSD2 requires those banks,
- if you so direct, to allow
- third parties access to your data, to your accounts.
- And this fundamentally sets
- a framework for banks’ business
- being transformed as customers’ data and access
- to their accounts is no longer under the control
- of banks and other financial institutions,
- but it is open to new entrants,
- new startups, new tech firms,
- all of which are gaining access to massive
- amounts of data under the control
- of the individual consumer,
- rather than the financial institution.
- And finally, MiFID II.
- MiFID II is
- the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II.
- MiFID II is an initiative that has evolved
- out of the 2008 global financial crisis.
- It is fundamentally about creating greater transparency
- in the formal financial markets,
- markets for bonds, shares, derivatives, and the like,
- whether those are traded on exchange or off exchange.
- And amongst many other things,
- it requires the reporting of all transactions
- relating to EU financial instruments,
- like bonds or shares or derivatives, whether or not
- those transactions take place on or off exchange.
- In terms of total size, it has grown to be
- more than 1.7 million paragraphs in length,
- 7,000 printed pages of regulations,
- which have required financial institutions to spend
- literally tens of billions of dollars in
- building new systems
- to meet its reporting requirements.
- Each of these systems,
- PSD2, GDPR, and MiFID II,
- were all designed for specific reasons.
- But no one thought about what would happen
- when you combined them together.
- And this will be a big bang
- transforming over the coming decade
- the European financial services industry,
- bringing together data and finance in a way
- that has never been seen before in the context
- of the EU single financial market.
Industry Showcase: PSD2: Open Banking API for Startups (Gini)
- For decades, FinTech startups
- have been developing useful apps
- and products to supplement normal banking products,
- and also give consumers more control and insight
- into their own finances.
- However, banks have never been keen on sharing data,
- so FinTech companies have had
- to spend considerable resources
- to develop workarounds to get the data.
- One of the main ways they have done this
- is through screen scraping.
- Screen scraping is the act of developing a programme
- to crawl through a website
- and copy the information into another database.
- This is commonly found in search engines like Google,
- which send crawlers through the internet
- to develop their search engine database.
- This year the European Union
- implemented Revised Directive
- on Payment Services aka PSD2
- which included regulations to promote the development
- and use of online and mobile payments
- such as open banking.
- Other countries are following suit,
- and in Asia, both Hong Kong and Singapore,
- as well as other countries
- are exploring opening banking APIs.
- Opening banking APIs would facilitate
- the growth of FinTech companies
- and also give consumers greater choice
- and opportunities in managing their financial lives.
Industry Showcase: Methods of Data Protection: GDPR Compliance and Personal Privacy (Exate Technology)
- Hello, my name is Jonathan Naismith
- and I am the Business Manager for Exate Technology,
- a RegTech firm specialising in
- data protection and data privacy,
- enabling regulatory compliance
- with the EU General Data Protection Regulation
- as well as Cross-Border Data Transfers.
- The recent data breaches at firms
- such as Equifax, Uber and Facebook’s breach of privacy
- have led many to question the ability of firms
- to protect sensitive client data.
- Sadly, these recent breaches
- have become more of a trend than a phenomenon
- as they are increasingly common.
- So, why is this the case?
- To date, data protection has typically been done
- on an application by application level
- and each application is protected by an IT developer.
- The common problems with this
- are your IT developers are often contractors,
- and thus probably work somewhere else now
- and they view the task of protecting those applications
- as boring and time consuming.
- With new computing viruses being created daily
- and the introduction of
- quantum computing nearly upon us,
- traditional data protection has become outdated
- and needs to be addressed now.
- At Exate, we encrypt or tokenise the data
- on an attribute by attribute level at rest,
- in transit, and in memory as required under GDPR.
- This then allows an organisation
- to separate application security from data security.
- The question now becomes,
- “How does one view the data if it is always encrypted?”
- Exate ensure that data is seen strictly
- on a need to know basis for
- that specific individual, team, department or firm
- to fulfil their role.
- We achieve this by providing
- your data with a virtual visa.
- This is done by wrapping metadata or rules
- around each individual data attribute
- and allowing those attributes
- to flow throughout the organisation with those rules.
- Exate then just sit outside a firm’s applications
- and acts as an automated border control for your data.
- To explain, imagine you have flown into an airport.
- If you are a local resident,
- you go down the fast track,
- that is your public data, it doesn’t need to be protected
- it just flows throughout your organisation.
- Now your tourists,
- they have to go to the man in the booth
- who checks their passports and looks at their visa
- before deciding whether or not
- they can enter the country,
- we do the exact same thing for your data.
- So just before the data enters an application
- we look at the rules around each attribute
- and match that back to the individual
- who’s trying to access the data.
- Now one of two things can happen.
- One, the individual passed the rule check
- in which the data will decrypt, or two,
- if the individual fails even one of the rule checks,
- the data will remain encrypted
- and their access blocked.
- Exate then provides clients
- with immutable forensic proof
- of who accessed, or attempted to access what data.
- In addition, Exate are able to provide customizable
- user reports on your data,
- in short, data about your data.
- Lastly, Exate Technology has
- no access to your clients’ data,
- their decryption keys or their applications
- and requires no code changes to integrate
- with any web-based application.
- It is important to note
- the same technology can be used for
- Cross-Border Data Transfers.
- I hope this has been of interest to you
- and I would like to thank Hong Kong University
- for allowing Exate to share this with you.
5.5 Digital Identity
- This module will be around digital identity.
- The reason why digital identity matters is because
- it will be one of the most impactful technology
- in the next five years
- for you as a viewer.
- Identity can be defined
- in four different types of categories.
- Physical identity will be
- elements such as your fingerprint,
- your iris, or your DNA.
- Legal identity will be, for example, your passport,
- your Hong Kong ID, or your driving licence.
- Physical and Legal identities
- is what we call static identity.
- However, you also have something called
- dynamic identity.
- For example, your electronic identity
- is your social media.
- Facebook, Twitter, Weibo and WeChat
- are example of social media
- that are covering your identity.
- And finally, behavioral identity.
- The way you talk, the way you walk,
- the way you type a message
- is very unique to you.
- And therefore, electronic and behavioral identity
- are typically called dynamic identities.
- Now let’s bring that in context of finance.
- When you’re a financial institution,
- you will typically get to know your customer
- by the time they going to register,
- by giving their passport, or their legal identity,
- and electronically when they
- will be transacting with you.
- What you buy,
- the insurance products that you take,
- or the mortgages that you actually get from the bank.
- Apart from these touch points,
- the bank doesn’t necessarily know you.
- They don’t really have an access
- to your behavioral identity,
- they don’t really have access
- to your electronic identity.
- Therefore, the banks,
- unless you often are transacting with the bank,
- and if you have a bank account in the first place,
- will typically be unable
- to have a full picture about yourself.
- And this is why for example,
- in the West we call thin credit files.
- These are people that,
- whilst banks would often have financial interaction,
- and therefore are not always recorded
- as a customer of that bank.
- Now in that context, identity actually has few flaws.
- In the West, identity is more and more unsafe.
- Look at the recent data hack
- that has been happening for example in Equifax.
- Equifax was holding financial information,
- and now one in two Americans
- has information exposed to the public.
- However, if for example,
- in the context of developing markets,
- people don’t necessarily have passports.
- Because 1.2 billion people in developing countries
- do not have a form of formal identity,
- they cannot typically enter financial service industry,
- and therefore, we need to totally rethink
- the way we’re going to be identifying people
- to authenticate a transaction.
- So let’s take some of these examples.
- First of all, we’ll go in India.
- India has launched a programme called Aadhaar,
- which is now providing 99% of the population over 18,
- with a 12-digit number
- that is essentially a representation
- of your biometric data and your geographical data.
- With your Aadhaar number,
- not only can you withdraw cash at an ATM,
- but you will now also be able to authorise
- a large transaction,
- or even do an online learning course
- by scanning your iris to identify yourself
- as a student of that course.
- In Nigeria, digital identity is being used
- for civil servants.
- This is very important for the government
- because they have realised
- that there is a lot of identity theft coming on.
- That identity theft is then leading to people
- either receiving two times a salary,
- or receiving someone else’s salary.
- And since implementing digital identity to civil servant,
- they have now saved over 75 million US dollar.
- Finally, Europe.
- In the context of Europe,
- you have PSD2 on one side
- and GDPR on the other side,
- which are changing the way
- data of consumer is being used.
- Whilst PSD2 is more about payment competition,
- and whilst GDPR is about personal data protection,
- the combination of both
- is putting the individual
- at the centre of the financial services industry,
- and empowering them with their own data.
- Therefore, now someone would be able to give access
- to their bank account to a merchant that actually
- directly wants to transact,
- bypassing the traditional card network,
- or the merchant acquirers.
- Therefore, what we see is that
- finance is being changed,
- and digital identity alongside.
- We need to go from a model
- where we trade data for convenience,
- to a world where we trade data for compensation.
- Part of that step is going to be GDPR in Europe.
- GDPR, while not allowing individual to
- monetize their data,
- is providing individual control on their data
- by notifying an individual of a breach,
- or by allowing an individual of doing data sharing.
- Finally, the next step is going to be about reforming
- and how ownership is done.
- Once we have covered the ownership part,
- we’ll have to consolidate our data into a single wallet.
- That aggregation will allow us to bring together
- the behavioural data, the electronic data,
- the legal data, and the physical data
- into a single wallet that we will control,
- and then we can either grant access to,
- or monetize from.
- This is how digital identity will impact your life,
- and now let’s have a guest lecture
- that will share slightly more details.
5.6 Change in mindset: Regulation 1.0 to 2.0 (KYC to KYD)
- This RecTech Module has shown you
- how regulation is changing.
- This change of regulation
- can be captured by the notion of KYC to KYD.
- Know your customer to know your data.
- The reason why this is changing,
- is that from a regulator perspective,
- we’re going from a world where we’re regulating people
- to a world where we’ll be regulating processes,
- automation, and algorithm.
- And this requires a totally different mindset
- but also skillsets for a regulator
- to perform that job when that transition has happened.
- One of the first things that we’ll see
- will be about human capital.
- First, regulator from a human capital perspective
- will bring brand new stuff in to
- better perform their role as regulators.
- And in particular I have in mind data scientists.
- Just like technology companies or financial institutions
- have gone for the last few decades,
- regulators will keep on
- increasing their team of data scientists.
- The second part of that is
- that from a mindset perspective
- regulators have to accept that technological neutrality
- is not anymore a starting point.
- What’s technological neutrality has been
- a very important notion for the regulators to prevent
- them from chasing the latest changes in technology,
- today this is not sufficient anymore.
- The reason why I say that
- is because you have learned in the first module
- how financial technology cycles are shorter and shorter.
- But that’s exactly the same thing for regulators.
- Think about it.
- From your personal perspective as a consumer,
- a few years ago you would use your pin code to
- authorise a transaction.
- Last year, you might have used your fingerprint
- and tomorrow you might be using your iris.
- From a regulator perspective
- if every single time that technology are changing
- and evolving and you go to them and you say
- please can you find me an authorised technology,
- the regulators will be bombarded
- and clogged with the amount of requests coming in.
- And therefore what they said is
- I do not care about the technology,
- tell me about what you’re trying to achieve
- from a process perspective
- and I will make sure that process is complied with.
- The problem with that approach today
- is that more and more of the decision making
- is automated as well as the origination of products,
- and therefore if regulators don’t understand
- how algorithms are operating at the code level
- and the type of data that they are using,
- it will be very very difficult
- for them to perform their role
- which is about consumer protection,
- financial stability,
- and even competition.
- Regulation is therefore changing.
- We’re going to go from
- regulation 1.0 to regulation 2.0.
- And to do that transition from
- a know your customer world
- to a know your data paradigm,
- a few changes will have to happen.
- We have put together seven key points on
- how regulation is done today and
- how it will be done tomorrow.
- First point, consumer protection.
- What is important for regulators
- to ensure that the money of people
- doesn’t get lost or misappropriated?
- I think that this quote has highlighted to you
- the increasing value of data
- either from a monetization perspective
- or for a financial decision perspective.
- And therefore, data protection and data privacy will
- be equally important as monetary protection of
- your individual deposits.
- The second point is prudential regulation
- which requires firms to put control in place as well as
- capital in order to mitigate for risk.
- However, going forward,
- it’s more going to be about algorithm compliance.
- Where a regulator will have to do due diligence on
- a system and an algorithm before you’re allowed
- to go to market instead of simply asking for capital
- to be put against risk.
- The third point is financial stability.
- While financial stability is very important,
- it fails to encapsulate the notion that
- financial systems are very much dynamic networks
- of many individuals and companies
- operating at the same time
- that can impact each other.
- And therefore the capacity
- of regulating a financial network as opposed to
- promoting financial stability will be more valuable.
- And this is very much aligned with the vision
- and the quote of Andy Haldane when he talks about
- that Star Trek chair to supervise markets.
- The fourth point is about preventing bad behaviour.
- Whilst conduct risk has been a major focus point
- following the financial crisis,
- and this has been a positive development,
- firms are still able to pay their way out
- of reprehensible actions.
- Therefore, regulators would set in place a system where
- they can promote good behaviours in order to reinforce
- the quality of financial networks.
- The fifth point is about reactiveness.
- Regulators especially following the crisis,
- have been very reactive to the shock that
- the great financial crisis has brought to them.
- However, what we have seen in this course is that
- technology keeps on changing faster and faster.
- And therefore the capacity of being reactive to
- technological change will lessen in terms of value.
- Therefore, regulators need to be forward looking
- and think about how finances
- will be transformed tomorrow
- so that they can start to prepare today.
- The sixth point is about reporting.
- Push compliance is when financial institutions
- are sending reports to the regulators
- about specific questions
- that has been asked about them.
- For example, for the very first time the Bank of England
- has been asking financial institution to include
- the impact of FinTech in their business.
- What that means is that now financial institutions
- are thinking twice about how financial technology is
- going to be impacting their business
- from a risk perspective.
- Now, that simple question has therefore
- changed the behaviour of the firm that
- you are trying to supervise.
- Therefore a better way would be
- the notion of API compliance
- or the capacity of regulators to pull the information
- directly from the financial institution
- without asking them a question and
- therefore directly analyse the impact of external shocks
- such as FinTech on their businesses.
- Therefore, pull compliance will allow regulators
- to supervise firms without
- changing the behaviour of these institutions.
- The seventh point is about the barriers to entry.
- Today, financial markets are controlled
- from the supply of institution
- by the numbers of the licences issued by regulators.
- You can only call yourself a bank
- if you receive a banking licence.
- However, tomorrow the next barrier to entry will be
- about the quality of the algorithm that is held
- either by the financial institution or
- by the tech company.
- The reason why I say that is that finance
- on the back of the amount of data currently gathered
- is going to be incredibly personalised just to you.
- And therefore that level of customization and
- individualization will represent
- an experience barrier to entry which is
- driven by algorithm as opposed to
- simply the ownership of a regulatory licence.
5.7 AI and Governance
- In a previous module,
- I have briefly described artificial intelligence or AI
- as part of the ABCD technologies driving FinTech.
- As institutions increasingly explore
- and implement more AI and machine learning
- into their processes and offerings
- to customers and clients,
- there’s an increasing concern
- from policy makers, researchers and regulators
- about the responsibility and governance frameworks
- that should be in place.
- AI researchers have coined a useful acronym
- to better understand the core concerns.
- They call it AI F.A.T.
- Fairness, Accountability and Transparency.
- Machine learning involves algorithmic models
- being trained using datasets.
- However, the saying goes,
- garbage in, garbage out.
- Unconscious bias can arise,
- including egregious examples such as image data sets
- not facially recognising African Americans,
- or categorising them as gorillas.
- Malicious and mischievous actors
- can also influence machine learning.
- This was painfully demonstrated
- when Microsoft’s Tay chatbot
- devolved into racist and sexist rants
- as a result of learning from
- deliberately offensive behaviour of Twitter trolls.
- Furthermore, as ever more data sources become
- available to track both individual online behaviour
- as well as offline activities
- through connected devices
- such as wearables and smart homes,
- machine learning is being used
- to convert these behavioural data
- into individual profiles for predictive analytics.
- Yet, how fair is it if machines increasingly make
- financial access and pricing decisions
- based on individual predispositions
- rather than actions?
- Machine learning is being used for important processes
- such as credit ratings, search engines, bank loans,
- university applications, and health insurance,
- and becomes even more crucial
- when applied to RegTech
- which could lead to civil liability
- and loss of one’s liberty.
- For example, was there unconscious racial bias
- in the COMPAS algorithm for criminal sentencing
- risk assessments in the United States?
- Do Facebook’s algorithms have a confirmation bias
- that allows fake news to be targeted,
- and in turn did their postings
- impact the outcome of the Presidential elections?
- The need to combat negative bias outcomes,
- unconscious or otherwise,
- remains an important source of concern.
New Challenges of AI and Machine Learning
- Artificial intelligence is only so strong
- and so good as the data that you serve it.
- And actually when you think from
- a regulation perspective,
- it’s not so much the regulation
- of one algorithm which is going to matter.
- It’s more going to be about the quality of algorithm,
- and the natural tendency of
- algorithm to create a oligopoly.
- Data is fueling algorithm,
- and algorithm only grow by having more data.
- And therefore, technology companies
- are doing whatever it takes them to be able
- to capture all the data they can on their consumer
- to have a dominant market position.
- I think that data is the new oil as a sentence
- is reflecting what you had in the U.S. when you had oil.
- The antitrust movement in the U.S. that was trying
- to break away the big U.S. cartels around oil
- is what’s going to be happening in the data space.
- Because data is naturally driving network effects,
- and because network effects are themselves
- very naturally oligopolistic,
- the regulators will need to find a way of
- breaking away the dominance
- of large tech firms that are controlling most of the data.
- Your social data is most likely controlled by Facebook.
- Your e-commerce data is more
- likely controlled by Amazon.
- Your professional data
- is more likely controlled by LinkedIn.
- These people have all the information about you.
- And the only way to break away that stranglehold
- on your personal data is by allowing you as an individual
- to share your data to other people.
- So that you can then fuel the algorithm
- of a competitor with the data
- that you have been building
- about yourself for the last 10 years.
- This is where data regulation will go in the future.
- Data regulation will focus on individual data
- as opposed to the algorithm adjustment
- that will be required to be made
- by technology companies
- as requested by the regulators.
5.9 Data, Metadata and Differential Privacy
- I’m now going to be talking about the difference
- between data and metadata
- and how this is being expressed
- with the concept of differential privacy.
- If you think about what financial technology is,
- financial technology is about the digitization of money
- but if you introduce the notion of TechFin,
- TechFin is about the monetization of data.
- Therefore the point is going to be
- how are we are going to differentiate our data?
- Currently, the way this has been done
- is that technology companies
- have tried as much as possible not to have
- personal identifiable information about you.
- The reason why they try to avoid this
- is because as soon as they have PII data,
- they start to be subject
- to more stringent regulatory supervision
- and therefore increase costs for their business models.
- And so far this has worked.
- The reason is because personal information
- such as your age but also the content
- of a discussion is something that computer
- had a very hard time to understand and make sense of.
- Only very recently do computer have
- the sufficient computing power
- as well as the understanding of the human language
- to find out content in a conversation.
- Instead, what computers have done
- is to look at metadata.
- Metadata is contextual data
- which is around a content.
- For example, the metadata
- around my discussion with you
- would be how long it took me
- to actually record that video,
- the content and the numbers of people
- which are seeing that video, etc.
- The contextual data when it’s
- sufficiently cross referenced
- with a lot of different dataset
- which typically tech companies have
- will allow you to infer content.
- Let me take another example.
- If I am on LinkedIn and suddenly I start
- changing my behaviour, contacting more people
- and asking for meeting requests,
- this is going to flag LinkedIn
- that my behaviour is changing
- and therefore I may be looking for another job.
- And yet at no point did LinkedIn
- actually start looking into my messages
- saying I am looking for another job opportunity.
- They were able to infer that content using metadata.
- Data versus metadata is
- a very important thing
- because financial institution
- have very good at protecting your data
- but technology companies
- have been very good at monetizing your metadata.
- Therefore we need to start to see
- how we are going to create a framework
- to regulate that.
- And here you have an example of
- what technology companies such as Apple are doing.
- There’s a notion called differential privacy.
- Differential privacy is about giving
- the information to the person
- without revealing the whole information set.
- There’re many use cases that
- you can relate to.
- In the context of finance,
- typically for financial institution to on board
- a financial citizen will mean
- more stringent regulatory and compliance requirements
- because of that American citizen
- now being on boarded.
- And therefore sometimes it’s important
- for a financial institution
- to know that a customer is not an American citizen.
- Differential privacy allows for that.
- It’s about telling someone who you’re not
- without revealing the whole information.
- Therefore, as long as a financial institution knows
- I am not an American,
- I may be any other nationalities
- and that’s good enough.
- The other way of looking at it is for example,
- accessing certain website.
- Certain website will require you to confirm
- that you’re not under 18
- but they do not care whether you are 21 or 38.
- The fact that you are 21 or 38
- actually starts to be a hint
- towards personal identifiable information
- but that can be linked back to you
- and therefore differential privacy
- gets away with that notion by not sharing
- the full picture by telling who you are not.
- And as long as the rule set is strong in place
- with the financial institution,
- they’ll be able to leverage on that information.
- This is what differential privacy is bringing
- and differential privacy
- is typically being led by companies
- which are not here to make money from your data.
- Apple revenue is at 80% driven by hardware sale.
- Therefore, for them to not release
- and monetize your data is not actually a compromise.
- It’s something that makes economic sense.
- But a company like Google
- and Amazon or Facebook
- which have much more difficulty
- of actually enforcing differential privacy
- because their business is about sharing
- the whole complete set of information.
- Therefore going forward
- you will have a split.
- The companies which are not monetizing your data
- will support differential privacy
- versus the companies which are monetizing your data
- will typically look at data sovereignty
- as a governance model for their customer.
5.10 Data is the New Oil: Risk of Breach
- Welcome back to the HKU FinTech course.
- This module is going to be about data.
- Recently you may have heard about the sentence
- data is the new oil.
- These simple words have two deep impacts.
- On the first side, it means that data
- is going to be one of the most valuable commodity
- of the 21st century.
- On the second side, it also means that regulators
- are going to have to focus on how data
- is being consumed, extracted and monetized
- by individuals and companies.
- Now, data is not something new
- and data has been around for the last few decades
- and whilst two thousand represented
- rising massive tech companies
- which we still see today
- such as the GAFAs,
- Google, Amazon, Facebook and Apple,
- those tech companies have approached data
- in a total different way.
- For example, you may have heard about the expression,
- if it’s free, you’re the product.
- And that sentence really means one thing.
- Is that the personal data that you generate
- is more valuable to the company
- and this is why they’re giving you a free product.
- Tech companies have understood that
- and because data is core to their business,
- they typically have structured data,
- data that is searchable, indexable
- and that can create value more easily.
- But that’s not the case for everyone.
- Financial institution, for them
- data was a by-product of their business.
- Financial institution make money
- by putting a lender and a borrower together
- by investing your money into the stock market
- but they don’t necessarily make money by your data
- and therefore the data you provide them,
- whether it’s your passport
- or whether it’s transactional data
- is very much a by-product of their own business
- and therefore that data is so far unstructured.
- The difference between
- unstructured data and structured data
- is that structured data is searchable, indexable
- and can be more easily monetized
- for financial institution or tech companies.
- Now, data is being used in different ways in finance.
- For example, it can be used for decision making,
- new business discovery,
- enhancement of productivity
- and regulatory compliance.
- Let’s take an example for each of these.
- Startups are typically improving their product
- at a rapid rate because they use the data
- on their product and their consumer
- to keep on improving the quality of services
- they keep delivering to you.
- The second one is banks.
- Banks are using data
- to do better decision making.
- For example credit scoring.
- Credit score will impact
- whether a bank will originate a loan to you
- and if so, at what interest rate.
- Regulators and specifically securities regulators
- have been using data for a long time
- to monitor market
- and check if there’s no insider trading happening.
- For example, Alibaba has understood
- that there’s a correlation
- between people wearing skinny jeans
- and breaking phones.
- The reason is because of the lack of pockets.
- And therefore Alibaba is gradually starting
- to sell insurance product for phone coverage
- to the people buying skinny jeans
- on their e-commerce platform.
- In other words, what you have is that data
- has many opportunities
- and data will be allowing the rise of invisible banking.
- For the last 100 years,
- banks have changed the way they were operating.
- 70 years ago the notion of community bank
- where you used to know your banker
- and have customised service just for you happened
- but it was inefficient.
- And then the bank consolidation happened
- and now we have universal banks
- where you’re only one of a million of a customer
- across the globe
- but tomorrow you will have invisible banks.
- Invisible bank will create individualization
- of financial product just for you
- even though you’re part of
- a large financial conglomerate.
- On the back of those opportunities
- you also have risks.
- Those risk are very much the factor
- that data is so valuable
- and the people controlling data
- will now control markets.
- And therefore regulators have to understand
- how this is going to be changing in the future.
- The regulation of data
- might be one of the most important part
- for regulators to focus on
- as opposed to the regulation of algorithm
- because we control as individual or data,
- the firms control the algorithm
- and it might be easier to control data access
- than data output.
- Finally, market reforms.
- The rest of this course will show you
- how regulators from around the world,
- technology companies as well as financial institution
- are approaching the question of data.
- Whilst data ownership is very much looked
- for the individual perspective,
- we’ll discover that in India,
- data is regarded as a public good
- and therefore regulated as such.
- The rest of the course will show you
- all you need to know about data,
- how it’s impacting finance,
- infrastructure and regulators around the world.
Industry Showcase: Cybersecurity Industry Update (Microsoft)
- Hi, my name is Jason Lau
- and I’m the Cybersecurity Advisor at Microsoft.
- Today I would like to talk to you briefly
- and give you an update
- on cybersecurity industry as a whole
- and also some trends in the marketplace
- which certainly also impact companies in FinTech.
- Many say 2017 was the year of ransomware
- and 2018-2019 are the years of
- compliance, regulation, and privacy.
- This is surely the case with new industry regulations
- and laws coming in to effect this year
- like GDPR, Singapore Cybersecurity Law,
- PCI DSS 3.2 and many more.
- “Businesses and users are going to embrace technology
- only if they can trust it.”
- This message is from Microsoft CEO,
- emphasises the importance of trust
- whenever we deal with cybersecurity matters.
- The world is changing.
- And in the past it used to be
- it is not a matter of IF you will get hacked,
- it’s a matter of WHEN.
- Now hackers get more advanced
- and organisations are rushing to keep up to date.
- And the new phrase in industry
- is that you need to assume
- you already have been breached.
- Former FBI Director James Comey
- best summarised this as
- “there are two kinds of companies,
- the ones who have been hacked
- and those who don’t know that they have been hacked.”
- McKenzie also acknowledges this
- stating that cybersecurity is a CEO issue.
- And the loss of productivity and growth
- is over $3 trillion.
- The average cost of data breaches is $3.5 million.
- And as you can see, cyber threats
- are a material risk to your organisation.
- Here, I’ll briefly go through what we call
- the cybersecurity known attack playbook.
- On average, a hacker typically sits your network
- for over 500 days before they are detected.
- The hacker will spend a significant amount of time
- achieving their objectives,
- which includes reconnaissance,
- and involves social engineering
- to learn more about your organisation
- and users’ behaviour.
- Then they decide on a strategy
- for their initial compromise.
- Once they are in, they will protect themselves
- from any basic and typical actions companies will do,
- such as rebooting machines.
- From there, they will start to look
- for high-privileged accounts.
- And if they cannot,
- they will do their best to perform credential theft
- with the goal of elevation of privileges.
- From here, they will persist in your network
- and move laterally
- and then access sensitive data.
- As you can see, from a typical defender perspective,
- if you don’t have measures,
- security and real-time monitoring in place throughout,
- you are just playing catch up with incidence response
- at the very end of the lifecycle.
- This is really often too late.
- Thus, on top of the minds of
- chief information security officers,
- companies have identified
- their threat detection and response,
- data protection and identity
- and access management
- are key focus areas for 2017 and 2018.
- Here I’d like to talk to you
- about the evolution of security perimeters.
- In the past, we would build on our on-premise network.
- We would build it like a castle.
- And it’d be very hard for hackers to breach
- your physical infrastructure.
- Then it evolved to be more of a network infrastructure.
- And we got smarter.
- We put in things like intrusion detection systems,
- intrusion prevention systems,
- smart firewalls, honeypots, etc.
- But now this is not enough.
- And we’re moving to what’s called
- an identify driven security perimeter.
- In the past, all of your files and assets
- would be within your physical network perimeter.
- Each day, hundreds of thousands of attempts
- will be made on your network.
- And it would only take one user
- on the link to click through.
- Often it is through a phishing email
- in someone in your company,
- then they will get tricked
- into clicking that particular link.
- The link happens to be malicious
- and they could perform one of many actions.
- One action could be to download and install
- malicious payload
- to gain access to your company resources.
- As you can see in the diagram,
- in the modern workplace,
- employees access data
- from work, home, cafes, hotels, airports,
- and the attack perimeter now extends farther
- and going to users wherever they go,
- thus, giving rise to the title
- identify driven security perimeter.
- One way to help strengthen security
- is through multi-factor authentication.
- Unfortunately, all three factors
- of something you have,
- something that you know,
- something that you are,
- have all been hacked.
- The trend now is to look at multi-factor authentication
- and add additional layer of security
- called risk-based conditional access,
- where real-time monitoring
- and the users’ behaviours and location
- can help us to assign a user and session risk score,
- which then allows us to take immediate
- real-time actions to either allow access,
- deny access, or request additional levels
- of authentication before they continue.
- Microsoft has been leading the way with cybersecurity
- and trust and fighting for users’ privacy.
- Microsoft has stated that cybersecurity
- is a No. 1 priority for the company
- and investing over one billion each year
- into cybersecurity,
- including most recently,
- the purchase of an Israeli company called Hexadite,
- which focuses into the auto-detection
- and auto-remediation of security incidents.
- Thank you for your time
- and hope the short briefing on cybersecurity
- was useful for you.
- Thank you.
Additional Resource Insights
A. References and Suggestions for Further Reading
- From FinTech to TechFin: The Regulatory Challenges of Data-Driven Finance (Academic Paper: Zetzsche, Buckley, Arner, Barberis)
- The Emergence of RegTech 2.0: From Know Your Customer to Know Your Data (Academic Paper: Arner, Barberis, Buckley)
- How Tesla and Waymo are Tackling a Major Problem for Self-driving Cars: Data (Industry News – The Verge)
- The Future of Data-driven Finance and RegTech: Lessons from EU Big Bang II (Academic paper: Zetzsche, Arner, Buckley, Weber)
B. Additional Resource Insights for Module 5: Data & TechFin
- Microsoft Professional Programs in Big Data and Data Science – Learn How to Build Big Data Solutions and How to Explore Data by Using a Variety of Visualisation, Analytical and Statistical Techniques.
Module 6 The Future of Data-Driven Finance
Welcome to Module 6
6.1 Module 6 Introduction
- In the previous lessons,
- you have had a good overview
- of the history of FinTech
- and different aspects of it,
- from payments to data and identity.
- In this chapter,
- we will look at specific case studies
- that will illustrate the concepts you have learned before
- and show how FinTech
- is being implemented around the world.
- I have chosen five very different examples:
- an early stage FinTech startup in Europe,
- a late stage startup in the U.S,
- a bank in South East Asia,
- an e-commerce company in China,
- and an infrastructure system in India.
- These five examples are respectively
- Revolut, Credit Karma, DBS, Alibaba and Aadhaar.
- For each of these examples,
- you could easily spend days looking at
- their business models,
- technology, value proposition or growth story.
- I will share with you the lessons
- I find the most interesting,
- but do not hesitate to read about these companies,
- research similar models
- and further your education.
- Let’s now start
- and I hope you will enjoy the lessons.
- Thank you very much.
Module 6 Learning Objectives
Module 6 will bring together the various pieces of the course through a series of case studies. From this basis, it will seek to set the stage to consider future directions for FinTech.
In Module 6, learners will:
- Integrate know-how from previous modules in case studies of specific firms and initiatives.
- Analyse the impact of major trends in the context of traditional financial institutions, startups, TechFins, and developed and emerging markets.
- Consider future directions for FinTech and its implications for your own future.
6.2 Case Study 1: Revolut
- Welcome to this module where we’ll be discussing
- the case study of Revolut.
- Revolut is a very interesting company
- for many reasons.
- First, it is a great illustration of the process
- of unbundling and re-bundling of finance.
- Secondly, it is a great example of
- faster product development in finance.
- And last but not least,
- it is a FinTech startup
- that has real consumer adoption.
- Revolut links into many of the chapters
- that you studied previously,
- from the rise of the startups
- to mobile money,
- but also the evolution of payments
- as well as cryptocurrencies and exchanges.
- Revolut is a company
- that was created in the UK in 2015,
- and was founded by Nikolai Storonski,
- who’s a former trader at Credit Suisse,
- and Vlad Yatsenko,
- the CTO who was previously at Deutsche Bank.
- When Revolut started a few years ago,
- their value proposition was
- to offer a free debit card
- to those who were travelling,
- and didn’t want to pay the high fees
- they were charged when they were going abroad.
- In practical terms, what does it mean?
- Consumers would download an app
- to their mobile phones,
- they would create an account,
- and get onboarded through the phone.
- And a few days later,
- they would receive a debit card at home.
- This was a prepaid debit card,
- meaning that consumers would have to
- transfer money into that card,
- either from their bank account,
- or from another card.
- Once the money was deposited in the card,
- consumers could use it
- like a normal debit card,
- with the difference that
- any foreign transactions were free.
- That was their initial value proposition.
- Very quickly,
- as the number of consumers grew,
- Revolut also grew its product offering.
- In addition to the free account,
- they offered a Premium Account
- for example, that offered benefits
- like medical insurance.
- Then they offered lending,
- where consumers could apply for loans
- directly from their phones.
- And now also insurance,
- such as phone insurance
- or travel insurance,
- where the they can detect when you’re abroad
- through your phone
- and only charge for these days.
- Very recently,
- Revolut also started to offer cryptocurrencies
- where I as a consumer can
- directly buy cryptocurrencies from my app.
- Today, Revolut has passed 1 million users.
- They have raised more than $80 million,
- which is a very good number considering
- that they are quite lean,
- and do not need to spend that much money
- for customer acquisition.
- From starting in the UK,
- they are now available
- in the rest of Europe,
- and will certainly be looking at expansion
- perhaps in the US or in Asia.
- What are the takeaways
- that we can learn from a company such as Revolut?
- Revolut started on a very narrow product,
- from debit card for those who didn’t want to pay
- foreign exchange fees,
- and now they offer
- insurance, cryptocurrencies, business accounts
- for small businesses for example.
- And finally, they will also apply for a bank licence,
- in other words,
- they are also becoming a challenger bank.
- There are different types of
- innovation models in finance,
- and Revolut is a very good illustration
- of what we call the unbundling
- and re-bundling of finance.
- In other words,
- startups start on a niche product,
- the unbundling part,
- and end up offering
- a very wide range of financial products,
- the re-bundling part.
- The case study also shows
- the pace of consumer adoption in FinTech.
- If Revolut were a bank, for example,
- they would be the fastest growing bank in the UK.
- And they would also be the only bank
- to offer cryptocurrencies, for example.
- And finally,
- watch companies like Revolut very carefully,
- because of their agility
- and product development process.
- Their ability to launch new products very quickly
- is something which is quite different
- actually from traditional finance,
- but very similar to what we see from
- internet companies or tech companies.
- Now that you have learnt more about Revolut,
- why not do a small exercise?
- You could for example try to find similar examples
- of FinTech companies that are unbundling
- and re-bundling finance,
- and compare them to Revolut.
- Thanks a lot for following this module,
- and I hope you found it insightful.
- Thank you very much.
6.3 Case Study 2: Alibaba
- Welcome.
- In this session,
- we will look at the case study of Alibaba.
- Alibaba has already been
- mentioned several times in the course, for example,
- in the modules about mobile money,
- evolution of payments,
- and also alternative finance.
- I wanted to spend some time with you
- on Alibaba
- because it is a very important illustration
- of the changing landscape in finance,
- and how in certain markets,
- new entrants are quickly
- taking market share
- from traditional financial institutions.
- The financial arm of Alibaba
- started in 2004 with Alipay,
- to facilitate payments for users of Taobao.
- Alibaba’s Business-to-Consumers platform.
- If we go back in history,
- in 2002 eBay acquired PayPal
- with the objective to integrate payment
- into its auction platform,
- and facilitate transactions for its users.
- The creation of Alipay by Alibaba
- followed a very similar objective,
- and one of its first features
- were an escrow service,
- where the money was not paid to the seller
- until the goods were received.
- Alipay started as a payment mechanism for Taobao,
- but very quickly
- grew to offer more and more services,
- from payment of utilities to money transfer.
- In 2009, Alipay launched mobile payments,
- and this has become
- one of the most well-known successes of Alibaba.
- In practise,
- why is Alipay so different from other services?
- If you think of PayPal
- as a payment mechanism,
- Alipay in its first version
- was very similar to PayPal.
- If you think of Apple Pay or Samsung Pay,
- we could say that
- Alipay in 2010 was very similar
- to those mobile payment services
- where you can pay from your smart phone.
- But the biggest difference
- is that from the Alipay app,
- a consumer has access to all the services
- that a financial institution can offer,
- from payment to investment,
- from insurance to money transfer.
- In other words,
- Alibaba built a digital bank from scratch
- and put it directly in the smartphone
- of its clients.
- Today, the financial arm of Alibaba
- is Ant Financial,
- and although we think of Alibaba
- as an e-commerce company,
- Ant Financial is really
- a diversified financial services institution.
- It includes Alipay,
- which Alibaba calls a lifestyle enabler,
- and which I would call
- the ultimate bank in a phone,
- where consumers can make payments,
- buy movie tickets,
- invest money.
- And not just online,
- but also in physical shops.
- Today Alipay has 500 million clients.
- A second pillar of Ant Financial
- is Ant Fortune,
- the asset management arm
- that includes Yu’e Bao,
- which is today, the largest money market fund,
- or one of the largest money market funds in the world
- with more than $100 billion under management.
- Another activity of Ant Financial
- is Sesame Credit,
- which is a credit rating agency,
- and that takes a very large amount of data
- including social data to score individuals.
- In terms of numbers,
- Ant Financial has become
- one of the largest financial institutions in the world,
- with half a billion clients in China,
- but is also very significantly expanding
- in other countries.
- For example,
- they are an investor in Paytm,
- the largest mobile payment platform in India,
- or Ascend in Thailand
- and Kakao Pay in Korea.
- What can we learn from Alibaba?
- Alibaba is so massive
- that we could take it as an exception,
- but I think that it would be a mistake.
- There is much to learn from Alibaba
- in terms of innovation model,
- and that could be replicated
- in a lot of other situations.
- For example,
- what started as a mobile payment feature
- of an e-commerce platform has become
- a massive financial institution.
- In other words, we are seeing
- new entrants getting into finance,
- and reaching scale very quickly,
- thanks to their existing customer base,
- and a big leverage on technology.
- The example of Alibaba might be exceptional,
- but it is clearly not unique,
- and there will be more and more
- e-commerce companies and technology companies
- trying to offer financial products.
- The other takeaway
- is the rise of emerging markets in financial services.
- In some ways,
- the basic financial infrastructure in emerging markets
- is an opportunity
- for entrepreneurs and companies
- to build financial services from scratch,
- and to use the latest technologies,
- what we call leapfrogging.
- We are therefore likely to see
- very different types of FinTech development
- in the West
- and developing countries.
- Although Alibaba is exceptional in its scale,
- there are more tech companies
- getting into finance.
- Have a look,
- and you will see that there are more and more
- in a lot of different countries in the world.
- Thank you very much for following,
- and I hope you won’t forget
- that new entrants are coming into finance.
- Thank you.
6.4 Case Study 3: Aadhaar
- Hello and welcome to this module
- where we will be discussing about Aadhaar.
- Aadhaar is a very interesting illustration
- of the role of infrastructure
- in the development of FinTech.
- In other case studies,
- we talked about private companies
- such as Alibaba or Revolut
- but this one is really about infrastructure
- at the national level.
- Aadhaar was already mentioned in the previous chapters,
- in particular in the section about Digital Identity.
- Aadhaar was launched in India in 2009,
- with the objective to assign a unique ID number
- to all residents of India,
- and link it to biometric and demographic data.
- The reasons behind Aadhaar
- was both about inclusion
- because the birth registry system
- wasn’t robust enough and efficiency
- especially for the administration
- to handle requests from the public.
- Since the unique ID system
- could not start from an original document,
- such as a birth certificate, for example,
- biometrics were used to assess
- the identity of the person.
- It is done by taking the scans of the 10 fingerprints,
- as well as an iris scan
- and comparing it to the whole database,
- to make sure that you as a person for example
- is not included twice.
- Aadhaar is now a huge database of individuals,
- which includes demographic data
- as well as biometric data.
- In 2012, the Aadhaar system
- added a verification feature,
- that allowed organisations
- such as banks for example
- to enter an Aadhaar number
- and verify if the person was a resident.
- And this is where the identity infrastructure
- links into finance,
- because in the onboarding process of new clients,
- the step of Know Your Customer,
- what we call KYC,
- normally takes time and money.
- In 2013, Aadhaar offered the eKYC,
- Electronic Know Your Customer Service
- that allowed residents to instantaneously
- send their proof of identity and address
- to their providers, like a bank
- and making the KYC process much simpler.
- The Aadhaar initiative was quite incredible
- in terms of numbers.
- Three years after launch,
- 200 million people were enrolled in the system.
- Less than a decade after launch,
- pretty much the whole adult population,
- 1.2 billion people in India
- is registered on Aadhaar.
- In terms of application in finance,
- 400 million people have now
- linked their bank accounts to Aadhaar.
- Paytm, the largest mobile payments company in India
- with almost 300 million clients,
- can scale very quickly
- thanks to Aadhaar and eKYC.
- And we’ll see in the case study of Digibank,
- how Digibank uses Aadhaar in the case
- of a digital bank for scalability
- What can we learn from
- a case study such as Aadhaar?
- Aadhaar is an example which is really different
- from the other case studies,
- such as Revolut or Credit Karma.
- However, initiatives like Aadhaar
- are critical in the development of FinTech,
- because they can greatly accelerate
- the development of new financial services.
- The first lesson from Aadhaar
- is certainly the scale.
- It is quite incredible to see
- more than a billion people
- acquiring a digital identity in less than 10 years.
- The roll out of this initiative was very efficient,
- and also the role of technology in that process
- cannot be underestimated.
- And that’s why I don’t really see any reasons
- why similar identity infrastructure
- cannot be implemented in other countries.
- In terms of impact on finance,
- it was of course big in the context of India,
- where many people
- didn’t have any identification at all.
- But more generally,
- Aadhaar was the first example of eKYC at scale,
- which helped to decrease the time and cost
- to onboard clients.
- Aadhaar might not be perfect as a KYC system,
- but it is a very novel way of doing KYC.
- In the traditional finance system,
- each company does its own checks,
- whereas Aadhaar is a centralised checking system.
- As finance continues on
- becoming more and more digitized,
- these discussions about how to do eKYC
- will certainly continue.
- And last but not least
- is of course the social impact
- of infrastructure like Aadhaar.
- Similarly to Alibaba
- that helped millions access finance,
- Aadhaar helped many to acquire an identity.
- And in itself, it is an amazing feat.
- If you were thinking of being an entrepreneur,
- the presence, or absence, of infrastructure like Aadhaar
- can greatly impact your business model,
- so I’d certainly recommend spending some time
- looking more into these topics.
- Thank you very much for following,
- and I hope you enjoyed this part.
6.5 Case Study 4: Credit Karma
- Hello and welcome to this module
- about Credit Karma.
- The reason why I chose Credit Karma
- is because it is a very interesting example
- of a business model linked to
- the monetization of data in finance.
- In other words,
- this is a financial company
- that makes money from data
- in the same way
- as Facebook or Google for example,
- but really in the field of finance.
- You have heard about
- the changing role of data in finance
- in previous modules,
- and Credit Karma will help you understand
- how it works in practise.
- Credit Karma is a US company
- that was created in 2007
- by Kenneth Lin, Nichole Mustard and Ryan Graciano.
- They started with the vision
- that credit and financial data should be free.
- What does it mean in practise?
- In the US, any lending decision
- is linked to the credit score of the consumers.
- For example, if I wanted to borrow for a house
- or for a car,
- my bank would first check my credit score.
- Until Credit Karma started,
- consumers could access their credit score,
- but they had to pay for it.
- Credit Karma’s model
- was to offer credit scores
- to their users but for free.
- In exchange of this free service,
- Credit Karma sends targeted advertising.
- For example, Credit Karma,
- having the information about its users,
- could suggest a credit card with a lower rate,
- and Credit Karma would be paid a fee
- if the users take that credit card.
- As they grew,
- they started to offer more and more products.
- They started to offer free credit scores,
- but then credit monitoring,
- recommendations for credit card,
- free tax filings,
- recommendation for loans,
- and identity monitoring for example.
- In other words,
- as they got an increasing amount
- of data about their users,
- they could offer
- more and more free financial advice,
- and make money
- when there’s a transaction at the end.
- As a company, the growth of Credit Karma
- has been quite amazing
- during the last few years.
- Today they have 75 million users,
- including a third of all millennials
- and a third of all Americans
- with a credit profile.
- In 2016, they made more than $500 million in revenue
- and they were rumoured to be profitable.
- They have also raised around $400 million
- and at their last round of financing,
- they were valued at $3.5 billion.
- In terms of international expansion,
- they have now also expanded into Canada.
- So, what can we learn from Credit Karma?
- We hear a lot about the role of data in finance,
- but what does it really mean?
- Credit Karma is an interesting example,
- because from a conceptual standpoint,
- it is very similar to
- what Google for example would do
- if they wanted to monetize data in finance:
- offer a product for free,
- and in exchange push targeted advertising.
- And so perhaps it’s not a coincidence
- that Google is actually
- an investor in Credit Karma.
- Credit Karma is also an interesting illustration
- of scalability in finance.
- Normally in finance
- it used to take quite a long time
- for financial companies to grow,
- but here we have an example of a company
- which managed to get 25% of the US adult population
- to use its products in less than 10 years.
- Again, that’s a blueprint that we normally see
- in tech companies rather than in finance.
- The importance of data in finance
- I think cannot be underestimated,
- and I suspect that most business models in finance
- will rely very heavily on data in the next decade.
- We are in a transition phase at the moment,
- where new models are emerging,
- and at the same time
- old models are trying to adapt.
- If you have the time,
- try to find companies
- that are successful in using data in finance.
- Thank you very much for following this module
- and I hope that you won’t forget
- that data will be big in finance.
6.6 Case Study 5: Digibank
- Welcome back.
- In this module,
- we will be talking about Digibank,
- the digital bank of DBS.
- Digibank is an interesting case study
- for many reasons.
- First, when we talk about FinTech,
- we tend to think of startups
- like Revolut or Credit Karma,
- or e-Commerce companies like Alibaba,
- but traditional banks and insurers
- are also very active in FinTech.
- Secondly, DBS, the Singapore bank,
- is considered as
- one of the most innovative banks,
- and it’s therefore good to understand
- how they are implementing innovation
- here in this stage
- by launching a separate digital bank.
- As you learn about Digibank,
- link it back to some of the modules
- that you have already watched,
- for example, Mobile Money,
- Opportunities in Emerging Markets
- as well as, Payments.
- So Digibank was launched
- by DBS in India in April 2016.
- The value proposition of Digibank was to be
- a paperless, signature-less and branchless bank.
- Digibank was launched as a mobile only bank,
- and with the objective of
- offering a different user experience
- by using Artificial Intelligence
- and Natural Language Processing, for example.
- So instead of calling a call centre,
- customers could have access to
- an AI virtual assistant
- to help them find transactions
- or do their budgeting, for example.
- DBS even acquired Kassisto,
- a US company specialised in AI for banking,
- to drive all these capabilities for the platform.
- One of the big focus of Digibank
- was the mobile experience,
- and they actively sought the customers’ feedback
- in their product development process
- to make the User Interface intuitive.
- In practise, customers for example,
- could open a Digibank account
- with no need for a paper or signature.
- They just need their Aadhaar card
- and their fingerprints,
- and in 90 seconds,
- can open a Digibank e-wallet.
- This leverage is very heavily on
- the Aadhaar digital ID infrastructure,
- which we have discussed in another module.
- Digibank offers
- a very standard suite of financial products,
- for example, consumers can open an e-wallet,
- a savings account,
- use a debit card to pay merchants
- and withdraw money.
- From the Digibank app,
- they can also make mobile payments,
- or invest in mutual funds.
- When was the results?
- 15 months after its launch in India,
- Digibank started also in Indonesia,
- with a very similar product offering.
- Digibank used the same strategy for onboarding,
- and leveraged on e-KTP,
- the Indonesian biometric ID system.
- What can we learn
- from a company such as Digibank?
- We tend to think of Challenger Banks
- as new bank startups
- competing with incumbent banks.
- Digibank is in practise a Challenger Bank,
- but launched by a very large bank.
- There are different types of innovation models
- for large organisations,
- and one of them is to launch projects
- that are totally independent
- both in terms of technology and management.
- Digibank is a very good example of such models,
- and has been quite successful,
- for example,
- today they have more than 1.5 million plans,
- and so it’s likely to be replicated by others.
- The case study also shows
- the importance of leveraging
- on existing infrastructure for FinTech projects,
- and in this case on the Aadhaar ID system,
- is a big driver
- for the user experience of Digibank.
- And finally,
- Digibank is an interesting example
- of strategic decisions in large organisations.
- Many projects in large organisations fail,
- not because of technology
- or product issues,
- but because of internal politics
- typically when new projects
- cannibalise existing products,
- and there is a resistance
- from internal departments.
- From a strategic standpoint,
- Digibank was launched in India,
- where DBS didn’t have a significant presence,
- and therefore
- there were no issues of cannibalization.
- Now that you have learnt about Digibank,
- have a look at similar models
- of Challenger Banks around the world,
- and see if some of them
- have a strategy which is similar to Digibank.
- Thanks for following this module,
- and I hope you liked it.
6.7 Conclusion to Case Studies
- Let me now conclude on what we learnt
- from the case studies of
- Aadhaar, Alibaba, Credit Karma,
- Digibank and Revolut.
- First, I think we learned
- that FinTech has a much broader definition
- than FinTech startups,
- and it includes of course startups,
- but also large organisations,
- from bank to technology companies.
- Secondly, it is truly global today,
- and our case studies brought us
- from the US to Europe and Asia
- but with very different development models
- in each region.
- For example, we looked at
- unbundling and re-bundling with Revolut,
- we discussed about data monetization
- with Credit Karma.
- Alibaba is about
- building a diversified financial institution from scratch,
- while Aadhaar is about
- creating an infrastructure for a billion people.
- And Digibank shows that
- we shouldn’t forget the role of traditional banks.
- Overall, we see fascinating examples of
- innovation around the world,
- new business model being created,
- and very fast growth
- from those who understand finance and technology.
- Whether you are a student
- who will enter the workforce,
- an experienced professional
- who wants to learn new skills,
- or an entrepreneur
- who wants to build the next Alibaba,
- the opportunities in FinTech are limitless.
- I would therefore like to congratulate you
- for having taken this first step,
- and encourage you to continue your journey.
- It was a real pleasure to be with you.
- Thank you very much
- for following these cases studies,
- and I wish you good luck.
6.8 FinTech Big Trends – Looking Forward
- Hope the last couple sessions have been quite exciting
- and learning about some of the big trends going on
- in the broader FinTech space.
- But actually, what is coming ahead?
- What are some of the big trends
- that we must be watching?
- Like I always say,
- whoever tells they’re a FinTech expert,
- you have to run away.
- It’s actually very difficult now to predict
- what’s going to happen in the broader FinTech space.
- But there are some big trends
- that we can actually look at and analyse.
- For example, one big trend is the rise of TechFin.
- As you know, startups have been really changing a lot
- of the financial landscape
- of some of the big, big, big game changers
- actually could come from the large technology firms.
- Think about it.
- WeChat, the messaging app produced by Tencent
- has more than one billion users globally.
- WeChat Pay, which is the payment tool
- in there has more than 800 million users
- over and across 25 different countries.
- So the reach of these platforms
- is actually quite incredible.
- And some of these technology platforms
- may really change financial services as we know it.
- A second big trend is the rise of voice
- as a user interface.
- Over the last couple of years,
- every financial institution
- was focused on delivering, being mobile first
- and delivering financial services to your smartphone.
- But what we are seeing right now
- is the rise of voice as a user interface,
- especially with new tools
- like Google Home or Amazon’s Echo.
- They are basically voice-enabled intelligent systems.
- And actually it’s going to be very interesting
- to see over the next coming months and years
- how financial institutions are going to start delivering
- financial services using voice as a medium.
- A third big trend we are seeing
- is how data is being used
- and how our perception of data is changing as well.
- Many are calling data the new oil or the new gold.
- And actually there’s a number of initiatives
- of how individuals can actually monetize their data
- and also have better control over it.
- Today when you’re using tools like Facebook or Google,
- actually, the services are free
- because they’re actually giving away a lot of your data.
- And there’s a number of people now exploring how,
- can actually individuals start monetizing where I can,
- for example, let an organisation access my data,
- but obviously, being compensated for that access.
- A big trend, the fourth one,
- is actually artificial intelligence and the rise of AI.
- As we discussed in this course,
- AI is actually here to stay
- and it’s really changing many facets
- of the financial services ecosystem.
- But it’s actually more than that.
- It’s also changing the nature of the forces,
- of the workforce, and how we live our lives.
- And it’s going to be very interesting over coming years
- to see some of the legal questions that will arise.
- For example, if, right now, I’m supervising 10 individuals,
- but I can replace those 10 individuals with 10 Chatbots,
- what if there’s a mistake that’s being committed?
- What if one of the Chatbots does something wrong?
- Who’s responsible?
- It might be me, as a supervisor.
- Is it the Chatbot manufacturer?
- Is it the user?
- Or is it the organisation that employs the Chatbots?
- So there’s many many actual issues, legal issues,
- that will come up that have not been addressed yet,
- and that will be quite challenging.
- And maybe a fifth and big trend,
- is really the rise of cryptocurrencies.
- We discussed in this course how ICOs, cryptocurrencies
- and crypto-assets have become part of, will become
- even more part of our everyday lives moving forward.
- And it’s going to be interesting,
- not only the impact these new innovations
- will have on the financial services ecosystem.
- But potentially, how it can actually enable us to solve
- some of the longstanding problems
- we’ve had for many years.
- For example, financial inclusion,
- where we can actually try
- to finally bring more people around the world
- inside the financial services ecosystem
- and being able to bank the unbanked.
- Thank you very much,
- and it was a real honour sharing with you my passion
- and actually our interest when it comes to FinTech,
- and we look forward to seeing you again,
- either in person or virtually somewhere in the world.
Industry Showcase: the Next Big Opportunities in FinTech (Hon Charles Mok)
- I think coming on that, the tech side,
- there are a couple of aspects
- that I was wondering about.
- If we look at FinTech, we see a number of
- major technological trends emerging;
- Distributed ledger technology in Blockchain,
- Cloud, Big Data, and Artificial Intelligence,
- Internet of Things, and others.
- In the context of these emerging technologies,
- where do you see the next big opportunities?
- Well, FinTech is actually a very wide term, you know,
- sometimes we talk to the local public here,
- they naturally or intuitively associate it with payment,
- which obviously is too narrow,
- and that’s one of the reasons why a lot of people say,
- Oh our FinTech is very behind China.
- I think they were probably
- only thinking about payment part,
- but in reality, if you also look at some of the other areas
- that you mentioned: Blockchain, Distributor Ledger
- is I believe obviously going to be a big, big opportunity.
- Now, (1) even though a lot of people today
- are focusing their attention
- on your ICOs, Initial Coin Offerings,
- or cryptocurrencies and so on,
- now that obviously because of the fluctuation
- in that market, and the high potential
- for short-term, huge monetary gains,
- obviously, a lot of people are very much attracted to it
- purely because of that speculative reason.
- But even if we put that aside,
- the future of cryptocurrency, how it is going to affect
- not just currency, but in fact ways of doing things
- in many different markets.
- I mean, we have seen people who are using
- this particular ideas to actually
- not just fund particular projects, but to also create
- new ways of incentives for different markets.
- And at the same time,
- Blockchain, I think would have
- a lot of different applications in areas even outside
- of financial services.
- I do believe that Blockchain is going to be,
- some people say that is going to be Web 3,
- the third revolution of the web or internet revolution.
- Now, I think there might be some truth to that,
- but the important thing is to figure out
- which are the areas
- that we could really put into application.
- And I think the other issue that we have to deal with
- is also developing the standards,
- standards between different countries,
- different economies, for a particular application to work.
- For example, a lot of people are saying
- that Blockchain technologies can be applied
- for land registration or many
- of these other public utility services and so on.
- But the thing is,
- how do we develop not just the technology,
- but possibly even internationally recognised standard
- for doing that sort of things?
- And these are the interesting developments
- that we might see in the coming years,
- and not to mention that obviously I think we also see
- a lot of new development in other areas,
- as you mentioned, AI, crowd funding and so on.
- It’s just moving very quickly
- and I think all these areas are important
- in their own right, but as the core part
- of the technology, I do believe that Blockchain
- will be the one to watch.
Industry Showcase: The FinTech Landscape in China – What’s Next? (Charles Mok)
- First question, I think you know if we look at China,
- China, we have seen this
- incredible technological transformation taking place
- in the context of finance.
- What do you think is next for China?
- Wow, that is a very interesting question,
- and difficult question.
- It’s difficult to predict at any time
- but I think in the past 10 or 20 years
- in particular with the internet,
- with the advant of the internet in China,
- leading to a number of areas
- of our tremendous growth and transformation
- digital transformation,
- basically, what we have seen
- is that in many industry there’s a total transformation
- of how to how things are being done,
- you know, from e-commerce to financial services,
- to particularly, especially in payment and so on.
- Now, we have to understand that for China,
- in some ways it’s easier for them to do that
- because in many of these regards
- they are relatively behind or starting from scratch,
- where for example,
- if we talk about financial services,
- their banking services and so on,
- basically, in the past were quite poor,
- especially for the rural areas, wildly underserved,
- which means that they have less baggage
- and they could leapfrog everybody
- in a relatively short period of time particularly because
- their internet mobile penetration is so high.
- So these are all the unique factors
- that we’ve seen in China.
- That’s why in many ways we always say that
- hey, China seems to be ahead of
- many of the other economies, not just Hong Kong,
- but actually in many of the developed economies
- in some particular areas.
- To me, I think the most important and interesting thing
- to observe in China’s next phase of development
- would be in regulatory issues.
- How they regulate these industries,
- particularly the financial services, FinTech industry
- after it’s been developed.
- You know, for us, with the baggage
- of being a financial services centre,
- we have to be very careful.
- Our regulators are very careful,
- so they are not likely to jump
- to allowing a brand new service with unproven record,
- or small companies to undertake some new stuff,
- whereas in China,
- they are often willing to try that
- even though after a while there are problems.
- There had been problems that
- arise in many different areas,
- most recently in P2P lending.
- Now, that wouldn’t happen here,
- because we would definitely be looking at it
- and say we have to regulate it
- well before we let these companies get into the market.
- Now, as China’s FinTech industry
- is becoming more developed,
- how are the regulators going to respond?
- And as their consumers become
- a bit more sophisticated,
- they may not be willing to live
- with the kind of wild west type of regulatory regime
- in the future.
- So I think that might be very interesting to see
- how China may be doing in that department.
- Yeah, and I think that that is a very interesting analysis,
- and I think you’ve brought up a couple of things
- and that is in developed markets,
- we don’t have the same sort of
- opportunity for leapfrogging.
- The second, is this idea of
- different regulatory approaches.
- China has been often highlighted as an example of
- a country which has largely left things alone to develop,
- and that has been important in the expose.
- Until they learned about it.
- Exactly.
- Until they learn as they go,
- whereas, for better for worse,
- in many of these other
- so-called global financial centres,
- we wouldn’t have the luxury of doing that.
Research and Development (R&D) and Interactions with Industries Part 1 (Charles Mok)
- From the standpoint of universities,
- we perhaps haven’t been doing
- as much as we should be
- on research and interactions with industry.
- And so, from the standpoint of FinTech,
- what sorts of opportunities
- do you see for universities
- collaborating with industry, in particular,
- to help build a broader ecosystem of FinTech
- where it’s not only basis for financial development,
- but also for other digital transformations?
- I think what you said summarised some of the
- biggest challenges we face in Hong Kong.
- As we, sort of, in the last 30 or so or more years
- transformed from a manufacturing economy
- to a service economy, particularly,
- especially including financial services,
- I think that particular transformation
- up to today obviously makes Hong Kong
- a financial services centre,
- one of the top ones in Hong Kong,
- but at the same time, it also led to our industry
- overly focus on some of the shorter term gains.
- A lot of people still think that there’s only two ways
- of making money in Hong Kong –
- financial services and property.
- In that kind of environment, sometimes,
- it was (it had been) quite difficult for the industry,
- for us to attract, to incentivize the industries to,
- let’s say, invest more in longer term endeavours –
- R & D (Research and Development) and so on.
- Not to mention,
- even some of the traditional manufacturing players
- in Hong Kong had long moved north of our border
- into the mainland,
- and I think in even the recent decades,
- they are even moving away from the mainland
- in search of cheaper labour.
- Now, that is obviously not the kind of things
- that you should focus on if you are really valuing
- the importance of your own intellectual property,
- of R & D (research and development) and so on.
- But, having said that, actually universities in Hong Kong
- have long been recognised, in terms of technologies,
- science and technologies, from biomedicine to
- electronics and many different areas.
- They’re doing quite good research,
- but you’re absolutely right that
- we haven’t been able to bridge from that research result
- and how to successfully commercialise it.
- Our government, after the handover, just over 20 years,
- they have started
- quite a number of government-supported schemes
- and funding schemes to try to improve
- that particular focus on applied research
- or commercializations of these research results,
- but I think so far the result has not been as
- good as we wanted it to be.
- Still, because of the industry’s lack of participation.
- Our new administration, well,
- one-year-old administration,
- they have recognised this problem, and they have
- established a number of incentives for the industries,
- including what they call super tax cut.
- You know, using tax incentives to try to
- attract more companies to get into this space.
- A lot of support from the central government
- to try to tell us all that, you know,
- our research is actually quite good,
- and they are going to be investing more and more
- into our basic research in Hong Kong to try to
- also provide the right incentives to the industry
- to try to hopefully bridge that gap.
- And the hard target that the government set last year
- was that they want to increase the percentage of
- our R & D in our GDP, which had been under one percent,
- 0.75 or so.
- They were targeting to double it within the next
- four to five years.
- Now, that’s probably achievable
- because of the facts that
- the government has been pumping
- a lot of money into it,
- but one thing that we really must change
- is that it cannot be done by just the government.
- If you look at those other countries that we’re looking at
- that says they invest four to five, or even more,
- percent of their GDPs into R & D.
- Typically in those countries or cities,
- you’re talking about 80, 90% of that investment
- to be coming from the private sector,
- supposed to, for Hong Kong,
- coming from the public sector.
- So, we still have quite a way to go, I think,
- to change the situation.
- But, I think what we need is some really, really
- successful cases of good technologies
- from Hong Kong
- being adopted, making good money,
- and successfully commercialised, either locally
- or even by other big companies internationally
- or within China.
- I think that we need some of these good examples
- and then, hopefully, other investors
- will continue to come along.
- We’ve just started it, I think, belatedly.
- We should have done it a long time ago,
- but I think the environment is changing.
- It’s a lot more positive than a couple years ago,
- but, of course, the international competition
- has also become much bigger.
- You know, every country is trying to do this.
- So, we have to see, and
- there’s still a lot of these issues that needs to be solved.
- How do we create the market?
- Where do we get the talent, and so on?
- In addition to just pumping in money,
- which the government has been doing.
- So, I think that next couple of years our government,
- especially in terms of manpower development
- and creation of the local and international markets,
- they have to do a lot more,
- and hopefully that will change the situation.
- I agree with that analysis,
- and I think looking forward,
- where are you seeing some of the most exciting
- technological developments at the moment?
- Well, a lot of people are looking at AI, right?
- Artificial intelligence.
- And obviously it can be applied in many different areas.
- And when you talk about AI, actually
- 30 years ago when I was at university,
- I studied artificial intelligence as well, right?
- So, how different was the theories at that time
- compared to today?
- A bit, maybe not too much, they’re still talking about
- neural networks and so on,
- but the biggest difference is that today
- we have the computing power, and we have the data.
- So that brings us to data analytics, data science,
- which, I believe, where we need a lot and a lot of
- new talent and people
- who needs to develop skills in those areas.
- Now, I think these are probably the fundamentals,
- and then you go into the different application areas.
- AI is going to be everywhere
- because of the availability of data and technology.
- A lot of people, a lot of companies or investors
- around the world are looking at ways to transform
- a number of areas where traditionally
- we have been doing things in this particular way,
- but let’s say, with these technologies,
- we can completely change the way of doing things.
- And we’re not just talking about digital transformation
- of a particular company and changing some software
- and processes and so on.
- One good example is automated driving.
- You know, think about automated driving.
- It’s not just about applying all these data
- analytics and AI into driving –
- it’s actually going to transform
- the whole ways of people doing things.
- If we’re not going to drive cars anymore, then
- how much of our productivity can be freed up?
- But on the other hand, how do you deal with the
- inevitable accidents and so on, so
- a lot of new developments we saw in other countries
- in insurance that is actually related to that area,
- both in terms of business, regulatory,
- as well as, technology,
- which I think because of the facts
- that we are still a bit behind in Hong Kong
- in adopting automated driving,
- our local insurance industry hasn’t really done much.
- So, I think a lot of these are very interesting,
- interlocking, interrelated industries,
- and applications, and so on, that will be coming along
- very quickly, and imagine that
- this talked about automated driving
- is just one small example of, and we’re thinking about,
- we could be talking about many of the same kind
- of the same magnitude of change in different
- particular areas of our living that will be
- totally changed in the next decades to come.
- You know, this is one from the standpoint of universities
- that I think is particularly important
- because it highlights, AI is going to be
- and is increasingly being used in basically
- every profession, every business, every sector.
- And it’s not necessarily about students knowing
- how to build systems,
- but knowing how to use technology
- in order to better perform.
- The second is from the standpoint of research
- and need for universities to focus on research
- that is not just about theoretically developing AI,
- but about applying AI.
Research and Development (R&D) and Interactions with Industries Part 2 (Charles Mok)
- From the standpoint of bigger picture,
- also it’s about thinking about
- the sorts of transformations
- that it’s going to have on our lives, on our professions,
- on the ways that we do things.
- This is one where I think that
- there is much greater scope
- for thinking about potential implications
- in terms of the legal profession, the medical profession,
- every profession and how we can use technology
- to achieve better outcomes.
- This idea of how can we use technology better
- for regulatory purposes, the idea of RegTech.
- We see it in autonomous vehicles,
- it’s a necessity in financial services,
- where are other areas can we actually think
- about using technology
- to better achieve social objectives?
- Well there are many.
- The whole idea is very simple, in a way.
- Data being available,
- we can learn from this data, but today,
- because, number one, machines can do all these
- number crunching much faster
- and better than human beings,
- and we have the ability to collect and store
- all this data.
- Then all of a sudden, we can use this data to
- not just prove or even predict many of the new trends
- of things that we didn’t know before.
- There are many of these areas of applications
- that would be actually very straightforward –
- healthcare is a good example.
- There are already quite a lot of evidence research
- showing that actually, particularly for,
- let’s say, radiology, and many of the different areas of,
- in the traditional sense,
- you have very good doctors and professors,
- medical professors, looking at a lot of data
- or images and try to decide what the
- diagnosis is going to be
- and actually the computer can totally outperform them
- already in many documented, evidenced research.
- So the thing is, in the future,
- how do we work that into the traditional, the existing
- regime, or the existing ways of doing things
- in those industries,
- including this data healthcare industry.
- How do we allow those decisions to be made?
- Will the professionals in those industries,
- let’s say in this particular case, the doctors,
- be very resistant and defensive
- because they think, “Oh I’m going to lose my job.”
- Or actually, they might figure out a way
- to coexist with the technology –
- use the technology for better serving the customers
- or the patients, right?
- So these are all very interesting future development,
- but actually, I still see that in the current setting,
- at this stage, we’re still struggling with
- a lot of the regulatory issues, that may be hindering
- some of these developments.
- Actually it could apply in some cases
- in financial services as well.
- How do we collect this data and analyse them
- in a let’s say anonymous way,
- that will satisfy public concerns
- about privacy and security,
- as well as regulatory requirements
- on privacy and security and so on.
- How do we balance that?
- Sometimes, some of these regulations
- are not entirely clear
- or drafted for the purpose of accommodating
- the use of machine learning or artificial intelligence.
- Some organisations might tend to be
- overly conservative,
- but how do we balance that?
- I don’t believe, on the other hand,
- that we should just do it without any regulation,
- or do it totally unregulated and lead to potential risk.
- But the big question is,
- I think we’re still figuring out how to balance.
- All I can say is that I hope that there will be more
- open-minded consideration
- and discussion of these areas.
- And try to move some of these regulatory
- and industry adoption initiatives faster,
- but at the same time,
- putting out these concerns and issues out to the public,
- to get to public understanding and support.
- That process is, of course, important,
- but I think it’s also only just being developed.
- I think it’s going to be very important.
Additional Resource Insights
References and Suggestions for Further Reading
- Amazon, Berkshire Hathaway, and JPMorgan Chase to Partner on US Employee Health Care (Industry News – CNBC)
- GSMA’s Case Study on Aadhaar: A Digital Identity Programme that is Inclusive by Design (Industry News -GSMA)
- Beyond FinTech: A Pragmatic Assessment of Disruptive Potential In Financial Services (Industry Report – World Economic Forum)
- Fintech for Financial Inclusion: A Framework for Digital Financial Transformation (2018 Report to the Alliance for Financial Inclusion (AFI))
End-of-course Message from Course Director Douglas Arner
- Just over a year ago,
- we started the process of creating this online course,
- An introduction to FinTech,
- and it has been an incredible year.
- I’d like to thank all of the instructors,
- all of our production staff,
- and in particular all of you who’ve joined us
- for the first six weeks of the course.
- The response has been truly incredible.
- Over 20,000 people from every country
- in the world, except Togo.
- So if anyone knows someone
- who is interested in FinTech in Togo,
- please ask them to look into the course
- Over the past year,
- we have done production on every aspect of FinTech.
- I think when we look forward,
- we can say that over the next year,
- a number of issues are going to dominate.
- This process of digitization and datafication
- has meant that today cybersecurity and tech risk
- are amongst the biggest not only financial risks,
- but also national security risks.
- Likewise, we are seeing the evolution of large TechFins.
- The entry of firms from the technology sector
- transforming the world of finance.
- Likewise as a result of this,
- we are seeing increasing issues about data security,
- data protection and certainly as we see the rollout,
- the impact of GDPR, of MiFID II, of PSD2 in Europe
- and also related initiatives elsewhere,
- these are said to further set the stage
- for more FinTech transformation.
- Now looking forward,
- we’ve reached the end of this
- first 6-week instructor-run course.
- And I know that many of you all along the way
- have been wondering why can’t I do it all once?
- I know that a lot of you like to see
- how quickly you can get through these courses.
- And I’d like to say that starting from 15th of July
- the course will be open.
- You will be able to do it as quickly as you want.
- And this is also important for those of you
- who are enrolled in the current course.
- The course ends but you’re rolled over
- from the 14th of July to the 15th of July,
- so that you actually have until the middle of May,
- the 14th of May 2019 to actually get through the course.
- And so, those of you
- who thought you were running out of time,
- you’re not out of time yet,
- you have until next May.
- And for those of you who finished
- and for those of you who are still progressing,
- over the next year, we’re going to be doing
- monthly updates on current issues.
- Likewise we are going to be rolling out
- periodic new industry insights
- from startups, tech companies, financial institutions,
- policymakers, regulators around the world.
- So we’ve very much enjoyed having you with us
- for the past six weeks,
- but we are very much looking forward to
- seeing you with us again over the coming year.
Looking Back, Looking Forward
Looking Back, Looking Forward
“Looking Back, Looking Forward” is a monthly segment launched in Jan 2020.
Each month, Professor Douglas Arner will discuss issues across the FinTech world – big and small themes, research topics and other topics of interest. Stay tuned for more.
Looking Back, Looking Forward Episode 1 (Jan 2020)
- Looking Back, Looking Forward.
- January 1st, 2020 marks the start of a new year
- and a new decade,
- both for us, but also for FinTech and RegTech
- and the launch of a new segment
- in our online course which we’re going to call
- “Looking Back, Looking Forward”.
- And in that segment each month,
- we’ll be looking at issues across the FinTech world.
- Big themes, small themes, research topics,
- whatever that month comes to us that is of interest.
- And if I look at the past decade,
- if I look at the 2010s, what were the themes
- that characterised finance?
- First, it was the global financial crisis of 2008.
- In many ways, the 2010s were an in-between decade.
- In between the 2000s and the global financial crisis
- and this decade, the 2020s
- and much of what happened in finance
- was characterised by the regulatory reforms coming
- after the global financial crisis.
- reactions and impacts of the global financial crisis.
- That’s one of the big themes of the 2010s for finance.
- The other big theme
- of the 2010s for finance was technology.
- The impact of a range of new technologies.
- Digitization, datafication, blockchain,
- AI and a range of others
- which over the past decade
- has transformed finance around the world.
- And it was really the combination of these two,
- the global financial crisis,
- particularly as it impacted regulation
- and technology that underlied the advent
- of FinTech and RegTech.
- Now, if we look forward,
- if we look froward to the 2020s,
- what are the big themes that we see lying ahead?
- Well, the first is sustainability.
- The fact that as the world develops,
- there’s going to be ever more focus on equality,
- on climate change, on biodiversity,
- on development and how can we build a world
- that is better and sustainable for not only all of us
- but future generations as well?
- The second theme that we see very much
- in the context of finance is technology once again.
- Technology continues to move at a very rapid phase
- and in particular when we combine technology
- with sustainability, this is where we get
- some of the most exciting possibilities
- for finance going forward
- and particularly for FinTech.
- It’s about new risks,
- it’s about deploying new resources
- through financial inclusion
- and it’s about building
- better financial systems through technology.
- Risks and opportunities from both sustainability
- as well as technology and also
- we think that the 2020s are going to be
- heavily characterised by challenges,
- conflicts between globalisation, fragmentation,
- traditional powers, rising powers
- and this will have a big impact particularly
- in the context of data flows and competition.
- The end result is that we expect the 2020s
- to be if anything, an even more transformational decade
- for finance and financial technology than the 2010s
- and we look very much forward to
- going through it with you.
Looking Back, Looking Forward Episode 2 (Feb 2020)
- Artificial intelligence is likely to be one
- of the major issues of the 2020s.
- Certainly when we think about some
- of the big themes that are being written
- around the world, the potential opportunities
- of AI and transforming almost everything generate
- huge amounts of excitement
- but at the same time, lots of considerations
- about the potential risks of AI,
- from simple automation and job losses,
- to replacement or even superseding of human beings
- by independent higher intelligences
- and an increasing amount of attention,
- not surprisingly is being focused around the world
- on how do we manage AI?
- How do we govern AI so that we secure the benefits
- but we minimise the chances of the risks
- and we use AI going forward to build a better world.
- But where relatively less attention has been placed is
- in the context of AI in finance,
- I think when we look at AI today,
- artificial intelligence has been through
- a number of periods over the past 50, 60 years
- where it has received attention,
- but today a unique confluence of factors
- mean that we are seeing more rapid development
- than we have ever seen before,
- and these are really the result of a twin process
- of digitization and datafication.
- What the world economic forum Klaus Schwab
- calls the fourth industrial revolution
- characterised by the digitization of everything.
- AI rests on data and in particular, digitised data,
- and today the world is creating more data every day
- than it ever has before,
- and this is a trend that looks set to continue,
- but as this data are digitised there is a need for storage
- and storage has become ever more available
- and ever cheaper.
- Combine these with computing power.
- We’re all familiar with Moore’s Law
- and the increasing availability of computing power,
- but combined with digital data storage
- and algorithmic theory,
- these together lay the groundwork
- for transformational development in AI.
- AI in finance is actually one of the world’s leaders.
- The finance industry is one of the largest spenders
- on artificial intelligence.
- Why?
- Because in finance, there’s a constant arms race,
- particularly amongst financial traders and investors
- who are looking for an edge in global markets
- to the extent that today,
- the vast majority of trading in global securities markets
- takes place not between human beings,
- but between computers,
- computers that interact increasingly in a context of
- more and more advanced algorithmic systems
- including those using an increasing variety of AI tools.
- So, AI in finance is developing very rapidly,
- particularly, in the context of global markets
- and global trading.
- Why?
- Well, the financial incentives, the financial resources,
- the human resources are all there
- to support its development,
- but this brings with it many, many challenges.
- How is the AI going to be monitored?
- What sorts of decisions is it going to make?
- Is it going to be discriminative?
- Is it going to be a black box
- that results in decisions, systems approaches
- that cause new systemic risks that no one can explain,
- no one can understand.
- When we look at finance, not only is it
- one of the most digitised industries,
- the most globalised industries,
- but it is also one of the most regulated industries,
- and a real trend that we’ve had
- since the 2008 global financial crisis,
- as well as the related Libor and forex scandals,
- or more recently scandals in finance in Australia,
- has been to push for more and more cultural change,
- ethical behaviour in the financial sector.
- How do we replace the greed is good
- of the 1980s and the 2000s
- with a much more ethical approach to finance,
- and one aspect of that is
- a regulatory tool focusing on personal responsibility,
- and what we’re seeing is an increasing trend
- of regulation to personal responsibility
- of individual managers, individual directors
- for areas within their supervision and control
- in regulated financial institutions.
- The reality is that AI falls into these
- in the same way as other activities,
- in the same way as a third-party contractor,
- in the same way as an employee, a computer system,
- a third-party, whether independent or not,
- should fall under the responsibility
- of a single human, a manager in charge,
- a supervisory responsibility system,
- and we describe this as human in the loop
- in the context of AI in the financial sector,
- and from the standpoint of the financial sector,
- this means that finance is in a good position,
- relatively speaking so long as those humans realise
- that they are responsible for the computer systems
- in their areas of responsibility.
- This drives systems of due diligence.
- It also drives systems of explainability,
- and we think that not only does this have huge potential
- in the context of AI in finance,
- but similar sorts of systems could very well be used
- in the context of AI in any regulated industry.
Unit
Looking Back, Looking Forward (FEB 2020)
Academic Paper
Artificial Intelligence in Finance: Putting the Human in the Loop
Written by Dirk A. Zetzsche (University of Luxembourg), Douglas Arner (University of Hong Kong),
Ross Buckley (University of New South Wales), and Brian W. Tang (University of Hong Kong)
This paper puts forth a regulatory roadmap for understanding and addressing the increasing role of AI in finance, focusing on human responsibility and suggesting that an effective path forward involves regulatory approaches in “putting the human in the loop” in enhancing governance and addressing “blackbox” issues.
The new paper can be found here on SSRN:
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3531711